Restoring the position in our move_resize_internal implementation
is too late. We need to do it at ack-time, before we hand off the
new position to the constraints code.
With our surface_mapped strategy, implement_showing might not
change whether the window has been shown or not, and thus we
might end up clearing pending_compositor_effect before the window
is mapped.
Only clear pending_compositor_effect when the effect has actually
been used.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
Make sure to only use it for when we send out a configure notify. We
should use the passed in rectangle for other scenarios, like a
client-initiated resize.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
Remove extend_by_frame and unextend_by_frame. Use a dumb hack in
window.c to translate into window geometry in back. We'll soon track
all rectangles in MetaWindow in terms of the window geometry.
Talking it over with Owen, we weren't sure why this was here.
At one point, we were creating a foreign stage window, so potentially
Clutter didn't select for its own events, but now we're using a standard
stage window, so this seems weird.
Why we did it on the COW, nobody knows. Maybe copy/paste bugginess?
Grab operations are now always taken on the backend connection, and
this breaks GTK+'s event handling.
Instead of taking a grab op, just do the handling ourselves. The
GTK+ connection will get an implicit grab, which means pointer /
keyboard events won't be sent to the rest of mutter, which is good.
When we click on a window with a passive grab, then the event_x
and event_y will be relative to that window, instead of relative to
the stage, which means that picking will be wrong.
Forcibly using root_x / root_y breaks nested mode. Nested mode is
a testing mode that should be replaced by a DRI3-enabled Xephyr,
though. It's getting too hairy to support properly.
Now that we grab devices on the X11 connection, we can run into
cross-connection issues. Since GTK+ frames are on the UI connection,
they'll get the passive grab when we click on them. Forcibly ungrab
on GTK+'s connection before attempting to take a grab on the backend
connection ourselves.
