We have a quite accurate view of the X stack, so there's no good reason to ask
the X server to do restacking that has no effect. (Restackings that have no
effect on either X windows or Wayland windows were generally optimized out in
the synchronization code, but in other cases like moving an X window that is
only beneath Wayland windows to the top of the stack we would make such
requests.)
Removing such requests:
- Is a small efficiency win in itself
- Allows us to immediately go ahead and apply Wayland changes to the verified stack
- Prevents queued Wayland changes piling up waiting for an X event that will never
be received, since the X server will not send confirmation of no-op restacks.
Since such operations may still have an effect on the relative stacking of X
and Wayland windows, we need to continue applying them to the local stack.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Now that all actual stack shuffle is handled inside stack-tracker.c, we can make
meta_stack_tracker_record_[raise_above/lower_below] internal to that file and
remove the unused meta_stack_tracker_record_lower().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
stack.c:sync_stack_to_xserver had both code for assembling the desired stack, and
code for enforcing the desired stack on the actual stack of X and Wayland windows;
the latter part is properly the domain of stack-tracker.c; moving the code to
apply the stack there both simplifies it and keeps stack.c more manageable.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
There was still code in stack.c to handle skipping override-redirect windows,
but since quite a while ago, meta_stack_add() is not called for OR windows
since they are outside our stacking control. Add an assertion and remove
unnecessary code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
stack.c kept it's own record of the last stacking it requested, so that
restacking could be done with minimal moves, but we already have a better
view of the stacking order with the stack tracker, so use that instead.
This allows eliminating the special case for the first restack.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Since MetaStackTracker is the code that knows about the current X stacking order
and the relationship between X windows and Wayland windows, it's cleaner to
encapsulate stack manipulation in MetaStackTracker rather than have the calling
code make the X calls and only call into MetaStackTracker to inform it about
the changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
The step where we requery the stacking order from the server than combine
it in an arbitrary fashion with Wayland windows can be eliminated by observing
that we are the final authority for Wayland window stacking - so if we
apply each X event that we receive from the X server to our stack in a
way that leaves the X windows ordered in the same way as on the server,
and apply events that we have stored locally in a way that doesn't affect
the ordering of X windows, than we have a fully correct ordering of windows.
Ordering this in the order of first applying the X event and then applying the
local portion also means that as long as we had an up-to-date view of the X
stack the composite operation will be identical to what was requested.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Putting X windows and pointers to MetaWindows into a union had a number of
problems:
- It caused awkward initialization and conditionalization
- There was no way to refer to Wayland windows (represented by
MetaWindow *) in the past, which is necessary for the MetaStackTracker
algorithms
- We never even cleaned up old MetaStackWindow so there could be
records in MetaStackWindow pointing to freed MetaWindow.
Replace MetaStackWindow with a 64-bit "stack ID" which is:
- The XID for X Windows
- a "window stamp" for Wayland windows - window stamps are assigned
for all MetaWindow and are unique across the life of the process.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736559
Add a basic framework for tests of Mutter handling of client behavior;
mutter-test-runner is a Mutter-based compositor that forks off instances
of mutter-test-client and sends commands to them based on scripts.
The scripts also include assertions.
mutter-test-runner always runs in nested-Wayland mode since the separate
copy of Xwayland is helpful in giving a reliably clean X server to
test against.
Initially the commands and assertions are designed to test the stacking
behavior of Mutter, but the framework should be extensible to test other
parts of client behavior like focus.
The tests are installed according to:
https://wiki.gnome.org/Initiatives/GnomeGoals/InstalledTests
if --enable-installed-tests is passed to configure. You can run them
uninstalled with:
cd src && make run-tests
(Not in 'make check' to avoid breaking 'make distcheck' if Mutter can't be
run nested.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
For reasons related to interaction between the GTK+ CSS code and the
frame sync protocol, the dummy GtkWindow that MetaUI creates to track
theme properties has to be mapped and have MetaWindow associated with it.
Add a private function so that the test framework can filter this out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
Add a private hook for the test framework to get XSyncAlarmEvent events -
this will be used to implement XSyncCounter based synchronization
so that the test framework can deterministically wait until Mutter
has seen actions performed by an X11 client.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
Add private functions for the test framework to use to find out the
wayland and x11 display names, so they can set up the environment for
children.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
mutter-test was a script that was used to run various test on the
Metacity source tree (build with different options, etc.) This likely
hasn't been run once since the Metacity/Mutter branch point; remove
it to avoid confusion with the new test framework in src/tests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736505
We'll need this in the wayland frontend to send a modifiers event to
clients.
Note that on X11 this isn't needed because key events include the
group index encoded in modifier state. If we ever want to make the
wayland frontend work with the X11 backend we'll handle it then.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736433
According to the documentation, the method returns "whether the X window
that the actor was displaying has been destroyed" - that is very much
true when we delay the actual actor destruction for a destroy animation,
so update the method accordingly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735927
When a window is destroyed, the corresponding actor may still be
kept around for the destroy effect. But as the actor is removed
from the compositor's stack list immediately, the compositor will
always stack it above "valid" window actors - this is not what we
want, so only update the compositor's list when the actor is
actually destroyed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735927
Setting the scaling factor immediately after calling clutter_init()
avoids creating the stage at one size, then later resizing it to
a different size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736279
In the case of a nested Wayland compositor inside an X session,
Clutter is managing the toplevel window size, so don't call
XResizeWindow on it - this will confuse Clutter and get the size
and the hints out of sync on the toplevel window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=736279
It's possible for a released pointer to have repick / set_focus on it as
part of sync_input_focus. When the pointer is actually re-init'd, it
will memset 0, which can cause corruption as our destroy listener has
already been added.
Released devices should be idempotent, so just make sure method calls on
them don't have any effect.
We can enter weird states where get_default_window is called during
window unmanagement, before the window has been fully removed from
the stack. Make sure these windows are *never* returned from
get_default_window, as focusing them can cause an assertion fail,
or worse.
If we add device 2, then add device 254, then remove device 254, then
the max device ID will be 253. Scan through all the devices again on
removal to calculate a new max device ID.
Rather than have the DBus code control this, move this into
MetaBackend. This also lets us destroy idle monitors when appropriate,
rather than leaking them forever.
