Add a `animateLaunchAtPos()` method to the AppIcon class to animate the
launch of an app at a given position. This allows for a visual
indication of whether dropping an app icon using DnD was successful at
the position the drop happened in a later commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
Return the results of calls to acceptDrop that we forwarded to the
Workspace object.
This fixes a bug where app icons that were dragged and released above a
window clone would get animated back to their original position
(indicating that nothing happened) even though they opened correctly.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
We allow opening new windows as a fallback in case the app doesn't give
us explicit information about it, but we don't want to allow opening new
windows if we're unable to ask for this information (we can only use the
APIs to get this information while the app is RUNNING).
So always return FALSE in case the app is STARTING, always return TRUE
in case the app is STOPPED (starting an app always opens a new window)
and go through the usual checks in case the app is RUNNING (and
eventually fall back to FALSE).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
`AppIcon.shellWorkspaceLaunch()` can easily be replaced by checking for
`AppIcon.app` and calling `AppIcon.app.open_new_window()` directly.
For compatibility and to prevent breaking extensions implementing the
function, keep supporting the `shellWorkspaceLaunch` API in AppIcon
while logging a deprecation warning. Also keep supporting the API on
drag sources (without deprecating it) to allow extensions to define
custom actions on their drag sources.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
The use of box-shadow on a StWidget that has a background-gradient was
not been rendered correctly, the shadow borders was calculated inside
the st_theme_node_prerender_shadow function and in the case that we've a
prerendered_texture the max_borders was not calculated and are 0.
This patch creates a new static function to compute shadow maximum
borders copying the code from st_theme_node_prerender_shadow, and call
this new method in the case that we've a prerendered_texture.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1186
If the search entry does not have any text typed in and a button press
happens outside of the search entry, we set key focus to NULL to make
the search entry appear unfocused.
This is quite intrusive and can easily cause unwanted focus changes, so
change the captured-event handler to only call `reset()` if the search
entry actually is focused.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/683
Instead of returning and waiting until the old timeout is finished,
start a new idle hide timeout for the overlay when the pointer enters a
window clone. This makes sure the timeout for hiding the overlay after
the pointer left the clone mostly stays the same (except when leaving
the clone via the title or the close button).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/683
As arrow functions have an implicit return value, an assignment of
this.foo = bar could have been intended as a this.foo === bar
comparison. To catch those errors, we will disallow these kinds
of assignments unless they are marked explicitly by an extra pair
of parentheses.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/731
Calling await in a loop means the asynchronous operations are
run sequentially instead of in-parallel. Usually that's not
what's wanted, so eslint has a rule to warn about this.
However here we use async/await to handle control back to the
mainloop between steps, so running operations sequentially is
actually intended.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/731
The intention of the code is clearly to operate on a copy, but that's
not how the Object constructor works. While it doesn't matter in
practice that we modify the passed-in object parameter, it's still
a good idea to fix the code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/731
They didn't just allow for the style patterns they were added to,
but allowed for some messed up indentation to slip through. Now
that we adapted the code to not use the old style, it's time to
drop the exceptions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
The legacy indent rule currently ignores arrow functions in parameters
to allow callbacks to not align with the other arguments:
this._someFunctionWithFairlyLongishName(arg1, arg2, arg3,
() => {
this._someOtherFunctionWithLongName(arg1);
});
But as ignoring entire nodes means we can end up with arbitrary
indentation, we should drop the exception. While this would make
the above "illegal" under the legacy config, it conforms with the
non-legacy style, so everything should be fine ...
... except that eslint starts to complain about some function args
that should be fine under the legacy config. Maybe it's thrown off
by the function-arg-in-arrow-function-in-function-arg structure, but
rather than figuring it out, let's just move those to the new style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
Some more places where the indentation doesn't comply with either
the old or new style. They slipped through because the legacy eslint
configuration accounts for some patterns by plainly ignoring certain
nodes. We'll address that later, first fix up the indentation errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
The indicator for the active workspace is currently two pixels
smaller because it doesn't account for the border used for
inactive workspaces.
Fix that to make sure all indicators have the same size.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1243
When there is a transition, it's likely that we are animating some part
of the desktop, and in such situations we don't want to unredirect
fullscreen windows.
This fixes unwanted unredirection when e.g. hiding a modal dialog by
re-enabling the unredirection after the animation has finished, instead
of when it starts.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/721
Updating the window list in the Looking Glass is a costly
operation: it destroys a whole lot of actors, and recreates
them. This triggers CSS changes, repaints, and allocations.
It is specially bad when paired with Wayland's big number
of window creations and deletions when showing Builder's
and Epiphany's popup window.
Only update the window list in the Looking Glass when it is
visible.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/556https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/719
We aren't quite ready to enforce non-legacy style for now, mostly due
to the xgettext bug that prevents us from using template strings in
some places, and vast amounts of legacy indentation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
Now that we fixed all pre-existing errors that are common between
regular and legacy configuration, we can stop filtering the result
by the lines modified by the merge request.
This will allow us to catch errors in merge requests that slipped
through until now, for example when leaving a newly-unused import
behind.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
Since ES5, it is possible to create objects with no prototype at all:
let foo = Object.create(null);
Those object won't have any builtin properties like hasOwnProperty(),
which is why eslint added a corresponding rule to its default rule set.
While this isn't an issue that affects our code, there's no harm in fol-
lowing the recommendation and call the method through Object.prototype.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
We currently use no less than three different ways of indenting
object literals:
let obj1 = {
foo: 42,
bar: 23,
};
let obj2 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23 };
let obj3 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23
};
The first is the one we want to use everywhere eventually, while the
second is the most commonly used "legacy" style.
It is the third one that is most problematic, as it throws off eslint
fairly badly: It violates both the rule to have consistent line breaks
in braces as well as the indentation style of both regular and legacy
configurations.
Fortunately the third style was mostly used for tween parameters, so
is quite rare after the Tweener purge. Get rid of the remaining ones
to cut down on pre-existing eslint errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
