Before this, creating a separate instance of `Location.Indicator` failed
because it tries to create export the same DBus path.
This is useful for extensions adding panels on multiple monitors. But
it also seems like a cleaner design to separate the indicator widget
from the logically separate role as a Geoclue agent.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1919>
We build controls layout using the whole monitor vertical space as
available, however extensions or external apps in X11 may reduce the
workarea size horizontally and the shell should always take care of it.
Given that we're already assuming that the allocation is monitor-based
and that we're adjusting it to the workarea, we can just make it more
explicit by using a workarea box that is used as the allocation area.
As per this, we also apply the same logic of applied to the vertical
dimension to the horizontal one.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
To compute the available height for the layout we're currently using the
panel position, while this works for the current and default setup, the
shell may be configured to use a different workarea, so we should rely on
it to compute the available space, instead of a specific widget.
So get the current monitor index for the current view and use its coordinates
instead.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
The background group is currently allocated taking care of the workarea
x, y offset but not of its width/height and this may lead to building a
wrongly sized workspace view when the workarea size is not matching the
monitor size (like when there are struts set).
So, take care of the difference between the workarea and monitor
absolute end coordinates to allocate the background scaled content box.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1892>
We currently disable all network items on both the lock- and login
screen. While it makes sense to be very restrictive on the lock screen,
there are some (fringe) use cases for being more permissive on the
login screen (like remote home directories only accessible via VPN).
There's precedence with the power-off/restart actions to be less
restrictive on the login screen, and since we started respecting
the `network-control` polkit action, it's possible to restore the
old behavior if desired.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
NetworkManager installs a `network-control` polkit action that can
be used to disallow network configuration, except that we happily
ignore it. Add it to the conditions that turn a network section
insensitive.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
Setting up a connection for an Enterprise WPA(2) encrypted wireless
network requires Settings. That's not available when windows are
disabled via the session mode, so filter out affected entries.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
The item launches the corresponding Settings panel when activated, which
doesn't work when windows are disabled by the session mode. Rather than
failing silently, turn the item insensitive.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1874>
This job does:
1. Download the coverity bundle and untar it in a cached location
2. Build GNOME Shell using clang and the coverity tool
3. Compress the coverity report
4. Upload for analysis
In a similar setup to that of Mutter.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1913>
It was on one hand using multi-line piping (`|`) and trying to
compensate with \ to escape multiple lines, this lead to:
No match for argument: \
Also, the quoting around pkgconfig() arguments would lead to
double quoting at the shell level, thus:
No match for argument: 'pkgconfig(gio-2.0)'
Fix both by using multi-line-turns-single-line piping (`>`)
and dropping the unnecessary quotes.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1913>
Unaccelerated deltas make sure the gesture works the same regardless of how
fast the fingers move; this is what we were already doing for scrolling.
Remove the swipe multiplier as the deltas already match scrolling other than
the 1/10 multiplier Clutter applies to scrolling specifically.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1763>
Since commit 3fb02843, we no longer skip allocation for
results that don't fit the width, and give them a 0x0
allocation instead.
That has the unintended side effect of those children now
being available to keynav. There are cases where we want
0-sized actors to be part of the focus chain (e.g. FocusTrap),
but this isn't one of them, so explicitly exclude 0-sized
children from keynav.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4470
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1916>
This ports over gnome-shell and the theme test case to MetaContext,
instead of the various functions that were available before.
The test case is changed to use the special test context, used to
construct contexts for testing. It's part of a shared libary separate
from the main libmutter one.
This enables building mutter tests during CI, as the test framework is
needed by some of gnome-shell's tests.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1840>
Destroying the source from an action callback will result in the
notification being destroyed twice:
- source.destroy() destroys all its notifications
- a notification destroys itself after an action
was activated
This results in unwanted log spam when attempting to dispose the
notification for a second time.
There is actually no good reason for destroying the source explicitly,
as sources already self-destruct with their last notification.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4457
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1908>
Currently we only mark the banner as removed if it is destroyed
while in SHOWN or SHOWING state, but not if we're already HIDING
(for example in response to `NotificationBanner::done-displaying`).
If this happens, we'll try to destroy the notification again at
the end of the transition, which leads to (harmless but annoying)
log spam since Notifications were turned into GObjects (that are
disposed when destroyed).
Address this by always marking destroyed banners as removed, while
still only triggering a state update while shown (or in the process
of being shown).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4457
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1908>
This bumps both the mutter image to the F34 one, as well as the one used
for review.
This also bumps ci-templates hashes, so that we can use
FDO_DISTRIBUTION_PACKAGES without installing weak dependencies.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1906>
`mallinfo` has been deprecated in favor of `mallinfo2`:
```
The fields of the mallinfo structure that is returned by the
older mallinfo() function are typed as int. However, because
some internal bookkeeping values may be of type long, the
reported values may wrap around zero and thus be inaccurate.
```
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1786>
It's not visible because it's covered by the actual wallpaper, so
not rendering it eliminates most of the render time for
`workspace-background`, without changing its appearance.
When animating the overview by tapping Super, this reduces the
shell's overall render time by about 15%.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1904>
Until now, the absence of a `background-color` would cause `box-shadow`s
to be invisible. That was a bug because `box-shadow` is meant to be either
the color specified in `box-shadow`, or if none was specified then the
foreground `color`.
There is nothing in the spec that says the `box-shadow` rendering should
depend on `background-color`, so separate them. This ensures `box-shadow`
is rendered even when `background-color` is absent or transparent.
https://www.w3.org/TR/css-backgrounds-3/#box-shadow
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1904>
From [the spec](https://www.w3.org/TR/css-backgrounds-3/#shadow-blur):
> the resulting shadow must approximate (with each pixel being within 5%
> of its expected value) the image that would be generated by applying to
> the shadow a Gaussian blur with a standard deviation [sigma] equal to
> half the blur radius
This does not change the value of `sigma`, it only corrects the value of
`sampling_radius` used to size the shadow texture. Since the texture is
no longer being slightly oversized it won't get scaled down when rendered
according to the dimensions provided by `st_shadow_get_box` in
`_st_paint_shadow_with_opacity`.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4409
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1897>
Having an inaccurate paint volume didn't matter until ae338af1e8, but
after that having too small a paint volume resulted in apparent clipping.
Not because `clip_to_allocation` is set, but because the offscreen
framebuffer is sized to fit the paint volume only.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1897>
