I don't want to remove them altogether, but they need to be ported to a
more reliable system, otherwise they end up failing at random depending
on the whims of the compositor and the windowing system.
The timeline base test unit is pretty slow, and under heavy load it will
tend to fail because of skipped frames. We should put it under
conditional testing and only run it if `-m slow` is passed to the test
harness.
When setting an explicit transform with clutter_actor_set_transform()
and a non (0,0) pivot-point, clutter_actor_apply_transform() will fail
to roll back the pivot-point translation done before multiplying the
transformation matrix due to the "out:" label being slightly misplaced
in clutter_actor_real_apply_transform().
This works properly:
clutter_actor_set_pivot_point (actor, 0.5, 0.5);
clutter_actor_set_rotation_angle (actor, CLUTTER_Z_AXIS, 30);
This results in the actor being moved to the pivot-point position:
clutter_actor_set_pivot_point (actor, 0.5, 0.5);
clutter_matrix_init_identity(&matrix);
cogl_matrix_rotate (&matrix, 30, 0, 0, 1.0);
clutter_actor_set_transform (actor, &matrix);
This also add a conformance test checking that even when using a
pivot-point, no matter how a rotation is set the resulting
transformation matrix will be the same.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690214
The CSS3 Transitions specification from the W3C defines the possibility
of using a parametrized step() timing function, with the following
prototype:
steps(n_steps, [ start | end ])
where @n_steps represents the number of steps used to divide an interval
between 0 and 1; the 'start' and 'end' tokens describe whether the value
change should happen at the start of the transition, or at the end.
For instance, the "steps(3, start)" timing function has the following
profile:
1 | x
| |
| x---|
| ' |
| x---' |
| ' |
0 |---' |
Whereas the "steps(3, end)" timing function has the following profile:
1 | x---|
| ' |
| x---' |
| ' |
x---' |
| |
0 | |
Since ClutterTimeline uses an enumeration for controlling the progress
mode, we need additional API to define the parameters of the steps()
progress; for this reason, we need a CLUTTER_STEPS enumeration value,
and a method for setting the number of steps and the value transition
policy.
The CSS3 Transitions spec helpfully also defines a step-start and a
step-end shorthands, which expand to step(1, start) and step(1, end)
respectively; we can provide a CLUTTER_STEP_START and CLUTTER_STEP_END
enumeration values for those.
For now, it just generates a simple horizontal slide (by writing
to /dev/uinput) and checks that the stage gets the events at the
expected coordinates.
The test won't run if it doesn't have read/write permissions to
/dev/uinput.
It also adds OS_LINUX to config.h.
The property uses an array with the following CSS style syntax
[ top, right, bottom, left ] or
[ top, left/right, bottom ] or
[ top/bottom, left/right ] or
[ top/right/bottom/left ]
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676367
It's a bit late in the game for changing the emission of the paint
signal with actors that use paint nodes - mostly because we have both
implicit paint nodes (background color, content) and explicit paint
nodes (the paint_node virtual).
When we branch for 1.12 we can revert this change.
This has been converted to a Cogl-based test in the cogl source tree
so there is no need to maintain it here anymore.
Reviewed-by: Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
A lot of the conformance tests that were just testing Cogl
functionality have been ported to be standalone Cogl tests in the Cogl
source tree. This patch removes those from Clutter so we don't have to
maintain them in two places.
Reviewed-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com>
ClutterActor should be emitting signals defined on the ClutterContainer
interface, as well as ensuring that manipulating the scene graph is
still possible from within them.
The new unit checks that we're emitting signals, by implementing
something similar to the Bin class available in toolkits like gtk, st,
and mx — i.e. a container that can only hold one child at any given
point.
Iterating over children and ancestors of an actor is a relatively common
operation. Currently, you only have one option: start a for() loop, get
the first child of the actor, and advance to the next sibling for the
list of children; or start a for() loop and advance to the parent of the
actor.
These operations can be easily done through the ClutterActor API, but
they all require going through the public API, and performing multiple
type checks on the arguments.
Along with the DOM API, it would be nice to have an ancillary, utility
API that uses an iterator structure to hold the state, and can be
advanced in a loop.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=668669
The correct sequence of actions should be remove(old) → insert(new), not
insert(new) → remove(old). We can implement a simple delegate insertion
functions to insert the new child between the previous and next siblings
of the old child.
While we're at it, let's also add a unit test for replace_child().
Verify that insertion and removal maintain a stable graph, with pointers
to the various children. This should help out tracking regressions in
the scene graph API.
This adds a simple conformance test which sets up a few shader effects
using both the old style with clutter_shader_effect_set_source and the
new style by overriding get_static_shader_source. The effects are then
verified to confirm that they drew the right pixel colour.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660512
Reviewed-by: Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com>
Setting :use-markup and :text is currently not idempotent, and it
depends on the ordering, e.g.:
g_object_set (actor, "use-markup", TRUE, "text", value, NULL);
does not yield the same results as:
g_object_set (actor, "text", value, "use-markup", TRUE, NULL);
This is particularly jarring when using ClutterText from ClutterScript,
but in general GObject properties should not rely on the order when used
from g_object_set().
The fix is to store the contents of the ClutterText as a separate string
from the displayed text, and use the contents, instead of the displayed
text, when toggling the :use-markup property.
Let's also add a unit test for good measure, to try and catch
regressions.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651940
Currently, only clutter_model_iter_set_valist() is in charge of emitting
the ClutterModel::row-changed signal. Both the set() and the
set_valist() functions can be called with multiple columns, so we
coalesce the signal emission at the end of the set_valist(), to have a
single ::row-changed emission per change.
The clutter_model_iter_set_value() function is just a thin wrapper
around the set_value() virtual function, but since it's called
internally we cannot add the signal emission there as well, as we'd
break the signal coalescing.
For this reason, we need some code refactoring inside the various set()
variants of ClutterModelIter:
- we only use the internal va_arg variant for both the set() and
set_valist() public functions, to avoid multiple type checks;
- the internal set_valist() calls an internal set_value() method
which calls the virtual function from the iterator vtable;
- a new internal emit_row_changed() method is needed to retrieve
the ClutterModel from the iterator, and emit the signal;
Now, all three variants of the value setter will call an internal
ClutterModelIter::set_value() wrapper, and emit the ::row-changed
signal.
To check that the intended behaviour has been implemented, and it's not
going to be broken, the test suite has grown a new unit which populates
a model and changes a random row.
This adds a conformance test for redirecting offscreen. It verifies
that the redirected actor has the right paint opacity, that it gets
redrawn only when the image cache needs to be invalidated and that it
ends up with the right appearance.
This adds a conformance test which creates a lot of textures with
increasing size and destroys them again a number of times in order to
cause a few atlas migrations. The last time the textures are created
they are all read back and the data is verified to confirm that the
atlas migration successfully preserved the data.
This adds a conformance test which paints using a pipeline that has
two layers containing textures. Each layer has a different user
matrix. When the two layers are combined with the right matrices then
all of the colors end up white. The test then verifies this by reading
back the pixels.
This creates a material which users a layer to override the color of
the rectangle. A simple vertex shader is then created which just
emulates the fixed function pipeline. No fragment shader is
added. This demonstrates a bug where the layer state is getting
ignored when a vertex shader is in use.
http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2221
Re-order the units into a sensible list, with basic tests at the
beginning, and per-class tests at the end - with Cogl last.
Also, start renaming the unit functions from test_<foo> to <foo>,
so that the executable wrappers and the reports have sensible names.
The TODO() macro for adding new tests to the test suite has always meant
to be implemented like the TODO block in Test::More, i.e. a test that is
assumed to fail, and which warns if it unexpectedly succeeds.
Since GTest lacks the expressivity of Test::More, the implementation
just verifies that the tests marked as TODO actually fail, and will fail
if they happen to succeed - at which point the developer will have to
change the macro to SIMPLE or SKIP.
Instead of trying to run ./test-conformance with the -l option to
generate a list of available tests it now runs sed on the
test-conform-main.c file instead. Running the generated executable is
a pain for cross-compiling so it would be nice to avoid it unless it's
absolutely necessary. Although you could tell people who are cross
compiling to just disable the conformance tests, this seems a shame
because they could still be useful along with the wrappers for example
if the cross compile is built to a shared network folder where the
tests can be run on the actual device.
The sed script is a little more ugly than it could be because it tries
to avoid using the GNU extensions '\+' and '\|'.
The script ends up placing restrictions on the format of the C file
because the tests must all be listed on one line each. There is now a
comment to explain this. Hopefully the trade off is worth it.
http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2363
