By the looks of it, commit 95e9fa10ef was taping over an Intel DRI bug
that would make it return post-swizzling pixel data on glReadPixels().
There's been reports over time of that commit resulting in wrong colors
on other drivers, and lately Mesa >17.3 started showing the same symptoms
on Intel.
But texture swizzling works by changing parameters before fragment shaders
and reading pixels from an already drawn FBO/texture doesn't involve those.
This should thus use pixel_format_to_gl_with_target(), which will result in
correctly requesting the same pixel format than the underlying texture,
while still considering it BGRA for the upper layers in the swizzling case.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/72Closes: #72
The GL_BGRA definition is not available for GLES2 contexts, which use
the EXT_texture_format_BGRA8888 instead, causing a build failure when
trying to use it in those contexts.
Fortunately, this hack is only relevant for GL, so let's guard it to
prevent the failure in GLES2, where that extension is used instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=786568
Fixes cogl_texture_get_data() resorting to the wrong conversions when
extracting the texture data. This notably resulted in RGB/RGBA buffers
copied as-is into BGRA buffers, for instance for the fullscreen animation,
or single-window screenshots of such buffers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779234
We already do have a texture with an internal format in these paths,
so we should check the required format according to it.
This fixes CoglAtlasTexture (and CoglPangoRenderer indirectly), as
it forces a RGBA format on its texture, but pixel_format_to_gl()
anyway assumed swizzling is performed on the texture, while it is
not the case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779234
This is used by the GL driver in order to determine whether swizzling
actually applies given the bitmap and target texture internal format.
If both agree that they store BGRA, then swizzling may apply.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779234
If the GL implementation/hw supports the GL_*_texture_swizzle extension,
pretend that BGRA textures shall contain RGBA data, and let the flipping
happen when the texture will be used in the rendering pipeline.
This avoids rather expensive format conversions when forcing BGRA buffers
into RGBA textures, which happens rather often with WL_SHM_FORMAT_ARGB8888
buffers (like gtk+ uses) in little-endian machines.
In intel/mesa/wayland, the performance improvement is rather noticeable,
CPU% as seen by top decreases from 45-50% to 25-30% when running
gtk+/tests/scrolling-performance with a cairo renderer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779234
We need a GLES2 extension macro in cogl-texture-2d-gl.c, but we can't
include GLES2/gl2ext.h because it will conflict with things in
GL/glext.h. We can't rely on cogl including anything for us since it'd
only include GLES2/gl2ext.h if OpenGL support was explicitly disabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774891
EGLDevice requires a define from GLES2, even when GL is used instead.
As type definitions may conflict between the two, we shouldn't include
both at the same time. Instead, provide the missing define explicitly
when not using GLES2.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=774891
Add API to enable the caller to have a custom method for allocating an
external texture. This will enable the possibility for mutter to
generate a texture from for example an EGLStream without having to add
support for that in Cogl.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773629
In cogl use cogl-config.h and in clutter use clutter-build-config.h. We
can't use clutter-config.h in clutter because its already used and
installed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768976
When using a context with robustness, glGetError() may return
GL_CONTEXT_LOST at any time and this error doesn't get cleared until
the application calls glGetGraphicsResetStatus() . This means that our
error checking can't call glGetError() in a loop without checking for
that return value and returning in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739178
