2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
/* -*- mode: C; c-file-style: "gnu"; indent-tabs-mode: nil; -*- */
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
|
|
* SECTION:meta-surface-actor
|
|
|
|
* @title: MetaSurfaceActor
|
|
|
|
* @short_description: An actor representing a surface in the scene graph
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* A surface can be either a shaped texture, or a group of shaped texture,
|
|
|
|
* used to draw the content of a window.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include <config.h>
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#include "meta-surface-actor.h"
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
#include <clutter/clutter.h>
|
|
|
|
#include <meta/meta-shaped-texture.h>
|
2013-11-21 16:25:20 -05:00
|
|
|
#include "meta-cullable.h"
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
#include "meta-shaped-texture-private.h"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
struct _MetaSurfaceActorPrivate
|
|
|
|
{
|
2013-11-19 11:22:49 -05:00
|
|
|
MetaShapedTexture *texture;
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_t *input_region;
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* Freeze/thaw accounting */
|
|
|
|
guint needs_damage_all : 1;
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
guint frozen : 1;
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-21 16:25:20 -05:00
|
|
|
static void cullable_iface_init (MetaCullableInterface *iface);
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
G_DEFINE_ABSTRACT_TYPE_WITH_CODE (MetaSurfaceActor, meta_surface_actor, CLUTTER_TYPE_ACTOR,
|
|
|
|
G_IMPLEMENT_INTERFACE (META_TYPE_CULLABLE, cullable_iface_init));
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
enum {
|
|
|
|
REPAINT_SCHEDULED,
|
2014-07-31 05:05:34 -04:00
|
|
|
SIZE_CHANGED,
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LAST_SIGNAL,
|
|
|
|
};
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static guint signals[LAST_SIGNAL];
|
2013-12-06 11:57:40 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_pick (ClutterActor *actor,
|
|
|
|
const ClutterColor *color)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActor *self = META_SURFACE_ACTOR (actor);
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (!clutter_actor_should_pick_paint (actor))
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If there is no region then use the regular pick */
|
|
|
|
if (priv->input_region == NULL)
|
|
|
|
CLUTTER_ACTOR_CLASS (meta_surface_actor_parent_class)->pick (actor, color);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
int n_rects;
|
|
|
|
float *rectangles;
|
|
|
|
int i;
|
|
|
|
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
|
|
|
|
CoglContext *ctx;
|
|
|
|
CoglFramebuffer *fb;
|
|
|
|
CoglColor cogl_color;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
n_rects = cairo_region_num_rectangles (priv->input_region);
|
|
|
|
rectangles = g_alloca (sizeof (float) * 4 * n_rects);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
for (i = 0; i < n_rects; i++)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
cairo_rectangle_int_t rect;
|
|
|
|
int pos = i * 4;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_get_rectangle (priv->input_region, i, &rect);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
rectangles[pos + 0] = rect.x;
|
|
|
|
rectangles[pos + 1] = rect.y;
|
|
|
|
rectangles[pos + 2] = rect.x + rect.width;
|
|
|
|
rectangles[pos + 3] = rect.y + rect.height;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ctx = clutter_backend_get_cogl_context (clutter_get_default_backend ());
|
|
|
|
fb = cogl_get_draw_framebuffer ();
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cogl_color_init_from_4ub (&cogl_color, color->red, color->green, color->blue, color->alpha);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
pipeline = cogl_pipeline_new (ctx);
|
|
|
|
cogl_pipeline_set_color (pipeline, &cogl_color);
|
|
|
|
cogl_framebuffer_draw_rectangles (fb, pipeline, rectangles, n_rects);
|
|
|
|
cogl_object_unref (pipeline);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_dispose (GObject *object)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActor *self = META_SURFACE_ACTOR (object);
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
g_clear_pointer (&priv->input_region, cairo_region_destroy);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
G_OBJECT_CLASS (meta_surface_actor_parent_class)->dispose (object);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_class_init (MetaSurfaceActorClass *klass)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
GObjectClass *object_class = G_OBJECT_CLASS (klass);
|
|
|
|
ClutterActorClass *actor_class = CLUTTER_ACTOR_CLASS (klass);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
object_class->dispose = meta_surface_actor_dispose;
|
|
|
|
actor_class->pick = meta_surface_actor_pick;
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
signals[REPAINT_SCHEDULED] = g_signal_new ("repaint-scheduled",
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FROM_CLASS (object_class),
|
|
|
|
G_SIGNAL_RUN_LAST,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_NONE, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-31 05:05:34 -04:00
|
|
|
signals[SIZE_CHANGED] = g_signal_new ("size-changed",
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_FROM_CLASS (object_class),
|
|
|
|
G_SIGNAL_RUN_LAST,
|
|
|
|
0,
|
|
|
|
NULL, NULL, NULL,
|
|
|
|
G_TYPE_NONE, 0);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
g_type_class_add_private (klass, sizeof (MetaSurfaceActorPrivate));
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-11-21 16:25:20 -05:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_cull_out (MetaCullable *cullable,
|
2013-12-06 20:28:39 -05:00
|
|
|
cairo_region_t *unobscured_region,
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_t *clip_region)
|
2013-11-21 16:25:20 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
meta_cullable_cull_out_children (cullable, unobscured_region, clip_region);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_reset_culling (MetaCullable *cullable)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
meta_cullable_reset_culling_children (cullable);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
cullable_iface_init (MetaCullableInterface *iface)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
iface->cull_out = meta_surface_actor_cull_out;
|
|
|
|
iface->reset_culling = meta_surface_actor_reset_culling;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2014-07-31 05:05:34 -04:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
texture_size_changed (MetaShapedTexture *texture,
|
|
|
|
gpointer user_data)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActor *actor = META_SURFACE_ACTOR (user_data);
|
|
|
|
g_signal_emit (actor, signals[SIZE_CHANGED], 0);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
static void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_init (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
priv = self->priv = G_TYPE_INSTANCE_GET_PRIVATE (self,
|
|
|
|
META_TYPE_SURFACE_ACTOR,
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate);
|
|
|
|
|
2013-12-06 14:19:32 -05:00
|
|
|
priv->texture = META_SHAPED_TEXTURE (meta_shaped_texture_new ());
|
2014-07-31 05:05:34 -04:00
|
|
|
g_signal_connect_object (priv->texture, "size-changed",
|
|
|
|
G_CALLBACK (texture_size_changed), self, 0);
|
2013-12-06 14:19:32 -05:00
|
|
|
clutter_actor_add_child (CLUTTER_ACTOR (self), CLUTTER_ACTOR (priv->texture));
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
cairo_surface_t *
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_get_image (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
cairo_rectangle_int_t *clip)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return meta_shaped_texture_get_image (self->priv->texture, clip);
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MetaShapedTexture *
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_get_texture (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return self->priv->texture;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_update_area (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
int x, int y, int width, int height)
|
2013-12-06 11:57:40 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
if (meta_shaped_texture_update_area (priv->texture, x, y, width, height))
|
|
|
|
g_signal_emit (self, signals[REPAINT_SCHEDULED], 0);
|
2013-12-06 11:57:40 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_is_obscured (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
return meta_shaped_texture_is_obscured (priv->texture);
|
2013-12-06 11:57:40 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_set_input_region (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_t *region)
|
2013-12-06 11:57:40 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
if (priv->input_region)
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_destroy (priv->input_region);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (region)
|
|
|
|
priv->input_region = cairo_region_reference (region);
|
|
|
|
else
|
|
|
|
priv->input_region = NULL;
|
2014-02-05 14:06:32 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_set_opaque_region (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
cairo_region_t *region)
|
2014-02-05 14:06:32 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
meta_shaped_texture_set_opaque_region (priv->texture, region);
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
static gboolean
|
|
|
|
is_frozen (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
2013-10-13 07:47:53 -04:00
|
|
|
{
|
2013-12-06 12:00:13 -05:00
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
return priv->frozen;
|
2013-11-21 17:45:05 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_process_damage (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
int x, int y, int width, int height)
|
2013-12-09 16:01:07 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-01-22 09:16:56 -05:00
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if (is_frozen (self))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
/* The window is frozen due to an effect in progress: we ignore damage
|
|
|
|
* here on the off chance that this will stop the corresponding
|
|
|
|
* texture_from_pixmap from being update.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* needs_damage_all tracks that some unknown damage happened while the
|
|
|
|
* window was frozen so that when the window becomes unfrozen we can
|
|
|
|
* issue a full window update to cover any lost damage.
|
|
|
|
*
|
|
|
|
* It should be noted that this is an unreliable mechanism since it's
|
|
|
|
* quite likely that drivers will aim to provide a zero-copy
|
|
|
|
* implementation of the texture_from_pixmap extension and in those cases
|
|
|
|
* any drawing done to the window is always immediately reflected in the
|
|
|
|
* texture regardless of damage event handling.
|
|
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
priv->needs_damage_all = TRUE;
|
|
|
|
return;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->process_damage (self, x, y, width, height);
|
2013-12-09 16:01:07 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_pre_paint (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
2013-12-09 16:01:07 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->pre_paint (self);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_is_argb32 (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
2014-03-25 17:02:50 -04:00
|
|
|
MetaShapedTexture *stex = meta_surface_actor_get_texture (self);
|
|
|
|
CoglTexture *texture = meta_shaped_texture_get_texture (stex);
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
/* If we don't have a texture, like during initialization, assume
|
|
|
|
* that we're ARGB32. */
|
|
|
|
if (!texture)
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
switch (cogl_texture_get_components (texture))
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
case COGL_TEXTURE_COMPONENTS_A:
|
|
|
|
case COGL_TEXTURE_COMPONENTS_RGBA:
|
|
|
|
return TRUE;
|
|
|
|
case COGL_TEXTURE_COMPONENTS_RG:
|
|
|
|
case COGL_TEXTURE_COMPONENTS_RGB:
|
|
|
|
case COGL_TEXTURE_COMPONENTS_DEPTH:
|
|
|
|
return FALSE;
|
|
|
|
default:
|
|
|
|
g_assert_not_reached ();
|
|
|
|
}
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_is_visible (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->is_visible (self);
|
2013-12-09 16:01:07 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
void
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_set_frozen (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
gboolean frozen)
|
2013-12-09 16:01:07 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-01-22 09:16:56 -05:00
|
|
|
MetaSurfaceActorPrivate *priv = self->priv;
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
priv->frozen = frozen;
|
2013-12-06 14:19:32 -05:00
|
|
|
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
if (!frozen && priv->needs_damage_all)
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
2014-02-24 16:00:12 -05:00
|
|
|
/* Since we ignore damage events while a window is frozen for certain effects
|
|
|
|
* we may need to issue an update_area() covering the whole pixmap if we
|
|
|
|
* don't know what real damage has happened. */
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_process_damage (self, 0, 0,
|
|
|
|
clutter_actor_get_width (CLUTTER_ACTOR (priv->texture)),
|
|
|
|
clutter_actor_get_height (CLUTTER_ACTOR (priv->texture)));
|
|
|
|
priv->needs_damage_all = FALSE;
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_should_unredirect (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
2013-12-06 14:19:32 -05:00
|
|
|
{
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
return META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->should_unredirect (self);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
void
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_set_unredirected (MetaSurfaceActor *self,
|
|
|
|
gboolean unredirected)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->set_unredirected (self, unredirected);
|
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-18 21:27:20 -05:00
|
|
|
|
window-actor: Split into two subclasses of MetaSurfaceActor
The rendering logic before was somewhat complex. We had three independent
cases to take into account when doing rendering:
* X11 compositor. In this case, we're a traditional X11 compositor,
not a Wayland compositor. We use XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get
the backing pixmap for the window, and deal with the COMPOSITE
extension messiness.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is FALSE.
* Wayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor managing
Wayland surfaces. The rendering for this is fairly straightforward,
as Cogl handles most of the complexity with EGL and SHM buffers...
Wayland clients give us the input and opaque regions through
wl_surface.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_WAYLAND.
* XWayland clients. In this case, we're a Wayland compositor, like
above, and XWayland hands us Wayland surfaces. XWayland handles
the COMPOSITE extension messiness for us, and hands us a buffer
like any other Wayland client. We have to fetch the input and
opaque regions from the X11 window ourselves.
In this case, meta_is_wayland_compositor() is TRUE and
priv->window->client_type == META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11.
We now split the rendering logic into two subclasses, which are:
* MetaSurfaceActorX11, which handles the X11 compositor case, in that
it uses XCompositeNameWindowPixmap to get the backing pixmap, and
deal with all the COMPOSITE extension messiness.
* MetaSurfaceActorWayland, which handles the Wayland compositor case
for both native Wayland clients and XWayland clients. XWayland handles
COMPOSITE for us, and handles pushing a surface over through the
xf86-video-wayland DDX.
Frame sync is still in MetaWindowActor, as it needs to work for both the
X11 compositor and XWayland client cases. When Wayland's video display
protocol lands, this will need to be significantly overhauled, as it would
have to work for any wl_surface, including subsurfaces, so we would need
surface-level discretion.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720631
2014-02-01 17:21:11 -05:00
|
|
|
gboolean
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_is_unredirected (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->is_unredirected (self);
|
2013-12-06 14:19:32 -05:00
|
|
|
}
|
2014-02-26 20:21:51 -05:00
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
MetaWindow *
|
|
|
|
meta_surface_actor_get_window (MetaSurfaceActor *self)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
return META_SURFACE_ACTOR_GET_CLASS (self)->get_window (self);
|
|
|
|
}
|