isa/mutter
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/brl/mutter.git synced 2024-12-25 04:22:05 +00:00
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
1f0826543e
mutter/cogl/cogl-pipeline-opengl.c

1310 lines
43 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
/*
* Cogl
*
* An object oriented GL/GLES Abstraction/Utility Layer
*
* Copyright (C) 2008,2009,2010 Intel Corporation.
*
* This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
* modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either
* version 2 of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
*
* This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
* but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* Lesser General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public
* License along with this library. If not, see
* <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
*
*
*
* Authors:
* Robert Bragg <robert@linux.intel.com>
*/
#ifdef HAVE_CONFIG_H
#include "config.h"
#endif
#include "cogl.h"
cogl: don't include cogl-debug.h in cogl.h or install cogl-debug.h is an internal header so it shouldn't have been included by cogl.h and the header shouldn't be installed either.
2010-07-25 20:36:41 +00:00
#include "cogl-debug.h"
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
#include "cogl-pipeline-opengl-private.h"
#include "cogl-pipeline-private.h"
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
#include "cogl-context.h"
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#include "cogl-texture-private.h"
build: Start moving to a non-recursive layout *** WARNING: THIS COMMIT CHANGES THE BUILD *** Do not recurse into the backend directories to build private, internal libraries. We only recurse from clutter/ into the cogl sub-directory; from there, we don't recurse any further. All the backend-specific code in Cogl and Clutter is compiled conditionally depending on the macros defined by the configure script. We still recurse from the top-level directory into doc, clutter and tests, because gtk-doc and tests do not deal nicely with non-recursive layouts. This change makes Clutter compile slightly faster, and cleans up the build system, especially when dealing with introspection data. Ideally, we also want to make Cogl part of the top-level build, so that we can finally drop the sed trick to change the shared library from the GIR before compiling it. Currently disabled: ‣ OSX backend ‣ Fruity backend Currently enabled but untested: ‣ EGL backend ‣ Windows backend
2010-09-13 10:30:30 +00:00
cogl-vertex-attribute: Use glVertexAttribPointer on GLES2 When the GLES2 wrapper is removed we can't use the fixed function API such as glColorPointer to set the builtin attributes. Instead the GLSL progend now maintains a cache of attribute locations that are queried with glGetAttribLocation. The code that previously maintained a cache of the enabled texture coord arrays has been modified to also cache the enabled vertex attributes under GLES2. The vertex attribute API is now the only place that is using this cache so it has been moved into cogl-vertex-attribute.c
2010-12-03 17:46:16 +00:00
/* This is needed to set the color attribute on GLES2 */
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GLES2
#include "cogl-pipeline-progend-glsl-private.h"
#endif
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#include <glib.h>
#include <string.h>
/*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* GL/GLES compatability defines for pipeline thingies:
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*/
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GL
#define glActiveTexture ctx->drv.pf_glActiveTexture
#define glClientActiveTexture ctx->drv.pf_glClientActiveTexture
#define glBlendFuncSeparate ctx->drv.pf_glBlendFuncSeparate
#define glBlendEquation ctx->drv.pf_glBlendEquation
#define glBlendColor ctx->drv.pf_glBlendColor
#define glBlendEquationSeparate ctx->drv.pf_glBlendEquationSeparate
#define glProgramString ctx->drv.pf_glProgramString
#define glBindProgram ctx->drv.pf_glBindProgram
#define glDeletePrograms ctx->drv.pf_glDeletePrograms
#define glGenPrograms ctx->drv.pf_glGenPrograms
#define glProgramLocalParameter4fv ctx->drv.pf_glProgramLocalParameter4fv
#define glUseProgram ctx->drv.pf_glUseProgram
#endif
/* These aren't defined in the GLES headers */
#ifndef GL_POINT_SPRITE
#define GL_POINT_SPRITE 0x8861
#endif
#ifndef GL_COORD_REPLACE
#define GL_COORD_REPLACE 0x8862
#endif
#ifndef GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER
#define GL_CLAMP_TO_BORDER 0x812d
#endif
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
static void
texture_unit_init (CoglTextureUnit *unit, int index_)
{
unit->index = index_;
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
unit->enabled_gl_target = 0;
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
unit->gl_texture = 0;
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
unit->gl_target = 0;
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
unit->is_foreign = FALSE;
unit->dirty_gl_texture = FALSE;
unit->matrix_stack = _cogl_matrix_stack_new ();
unit->layer = NULL;
unit->layer_changes_since_flush = 0;
unit->texture_storage_changed = FALSE;
}
static void
texture_unit_free (CoglTextureUnit *unit)
{
if (unit->layer)
cogl_object_unref (unit->layer);
cogl-matrix-stack: Convert to be a CoglObject We will want to use ref-counting on the CoglMatrixStack so it might as well be a CoglObject.
2010-12-10 16:06:16 +00:00
cogl_object_unref (unit->matrix_stack);
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
}
CoglTextureUnit *
_cogl_get_texture_unit (int index_)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NULL);
if (ctx->texture_units->len < (index_ + 1))
{
int i;
int prev_len = ctx->texture_units->len;
ctx->texture_units = g_array_set_size (ctx->texture_units, index_ + 1);
for (i = prev_len; i <= index_; i++)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit =
&g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, i);
texture_unit_init (unit, i);
}
}
return &g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, index_);
}
void
_cogl_destroy_texture_units (void)
{
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
for (i = 0; i < ctx->texture_units->len; i++)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit =
&g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, i);
texture_unit_free (unit);
}
g_array_free (ctx->texture_units, TRUE);
}
void
_cogl_set_active_texture_unit (int unit_index)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
if (ctx->active_texture_unit != unit_index)
{
GE (glActiveTexture (GL_TEXTURE0 + unit_index));
ctx->active_texture_unit = unit_index;
}
}
/* Note: _cogl_bind_gl_texture_transient conceptually has slightly
* different semantics to OpenGL's glBindTexture because Cogl never
* cares about tracking multiple textures bound to different targets
* on the same texture unit.
*
* glBindTexture lets you bind multiple textures to a single texture
* unit if they are bound to different targets. So it does something
* like:
* unit->current_texture[target] = texture;
*
* Cogl only lets you associate one texture with the currently active
* texture unit, so the target is basically a redundant parameter
* that's implicitly set on that texture.
*
* Technically this is just a thin wrapper around glBindTexture so
* actually it does have the GL semantics but it seems worth
* mentioning the conceptual difference in case anyone wonders why we
* don't associate the gl_texture with a gl_target in the
* CoglTextureUnit.
*/
void
_cogl_bind_gl_texture_transient (GLenum gl_target,
GLuint gl_texture,
gboolean is_foreign)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
/* We choose to always make texture unit 1 active for transient
* binds so that in the common case where multitexturing isn't used
* we can simply ignore the state of this texture unit. Notably we
* didn't use a large texture unit (.e.g. (GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS - 1)
* in case the driver doesn't have a sparse data structure for
* texture units.
*/
_cogl_set_active_texture_unit (1);
unit = _cogl_get_texture_unit (1);
/* NB: If we have previously bound a foreign texture to this texture
* unit we don't know if that texture has since been deleted and we
* are seeing the texture name recycled */
if (unit->gl_texture == gl_texture &&
!unit->dirty_gl_texture &&
!unit->is_foreign)
return;
GE (glBindTexture (gl_target, gl_texture));
unit->dirty_gl_texture = TRUE;
unit->is_foreign = is_foreign;
}
void
_cogl_delete_gl_texture (GLuint gl_texture)
{
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
for (i = 0; i < ctx->texture_units->len; i++)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit =
&g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, i);
if (unit->gl_texture == gl_texture)
{
unit->gl_texture = 0;
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
unit->gl_target = 0;
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
unit->dirty_gl_texture = FALSE;
}
}
GE (glDeleteTextures (1, &gl_texture));
}
/* Whenever the underlying GL texture storage of a CoglTexture is
* changed (e.g. due to migration out of a texture atlas) then we are
* notified. This lets us ensure that we reflush that texture's state
material: don't dereference layer->texture directly In _cogl_material_texture_storage_change_notify we were potentially dereferencing layer->texture without checking first that it is the authority of texture state. We now use _cogl_material_layer_get_texture() instead.
2010-08-08 12:05:40 +00:00
* if it is reused again with the same texture unit.
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
*/
void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_texture_storage_change_notify (CoglHandle texture)
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
{
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
for (i = 0; i < ctx->texture_units->len; i++)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit =
&g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, i);
if (unit->layer &&
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture (unit->layer) == texture)
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
unit->texture_storage_changed = TRUE;
/* NB: the texture may be bound to multiple texture units so
* we continue to check the rest */
}
}
cogl-pipeline-opengl: #ifdef out set_glsl_program for GLES 1.1 glUseProgram is not available under GLES 1.1 so it was breaking the build. http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2516
2011-01-17 12:20:06 +00:00
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
static void
set_glsl_program (GLuint gl_program)
{
cogl-pipeline-opengl: #ifdef out set_glsl_program for GLES 1.1 glUseProgram is not available under GLES 1.1 so it was breaking the build. http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2516
2011-01-17 12:20:06 +00:00
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GLES
g_return_if_reached ();
#else /* HAVE_COGL_GLES */
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
if (ctx->current_gl_program != gl_program)
{
GLenum gl_error;
while ((gl_error = glGetError ()) != GL_NO_ERROR)
;
glUseProgram (gl_program);
if (glGetError () == GL_NO_ERROR)
ctx->current_gl_program = gl_program;
else
{
GE( glUseProgram (0) );
ctx->current_gl_program = 0;
}
}
cogl-pipeline-opengl: #ifdef out set_glsl_program for GLES 1.1 glUseProgram is not available under GLES 1.1 so it was breaking the build. http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2516
2011-01-17 12:20:06 +00:00
#endif /* HAVE_COGL_GLES */
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
}
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
void
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
_cogl_use_fragment_program (GLuint gl_program, CoglPipelineProgramType type)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
Avoid mixing declarations and code Mixing declarations and code causes problems for MSVC as it is a C99 feature so we should try to avoid it.
2010-10-25 12:08:52 +00:00
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
/* If we're changing program type... */
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
if (type != ctx->current_fragment_program_type)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
/* ... disable the old type */
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
switch (ctx->current_fragment_program_type)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL:
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
/* If the program contains a vertex shader then we shouldn't
disable it */
if (ctx->current_vertex_program_type !=
COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL)
set_glsl_program (0);
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
break;
cogl-program: gles2: bind programs lazily as for GL This makes the gles2 cogl_program_use consistent with the GL version by not binding the program immediately and instead leaving it to cogl-material.c to bind the program when actually drawing something.
2010-07-23 09:12:39 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP:
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GL
GE( glDisable (GL_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM_ARB) );
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#endif
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
break;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_FIXED:
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
/* don't need to to anything */
break;
}
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
/* ... and enable the new type */
switch (type)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP:
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GL
GE( glEnable (GL_FRAGMENT_PROGRAM_ARB) );
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#endif
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
break;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL:
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_FIXED:
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
/* don't need to to anything */
break;
}
}
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (type == COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
#ifdef COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_GLSL
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
set_glsl_program (gl_program);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#else
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
g_warning ("Unexpected use of GLSL fragend!");
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
#endif /* COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_GLSL */
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
#ifndef COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_ARBFP
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
else if (type == COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP)
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
g_warning ("Unexpected use of ARBFP fragend!");
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
#endif /* COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_ARBFP */
Merge cogl-program-{gl,gles}.c into one cogl-program.c This merges the two implementations of CoglProgram for the GLES2 and GL backends into one. The implementation is more like the GLES2 version which would track the uniform values and delay sending them to GL. CoglProgram is now effectively just a GList of CoglShaders along with an array of stored uniform values. CoglProgram never actually creates a GL program, instead this is left up to the GLSL material backend. This is necessary on GLES2 where we may need to relink the user's program with different generated shaders depending on the other emulated fixed function state. It will also be necessary in the future GLSL backends for regular OpenGL. The GLSL and ARBfp material backends are now the ones that create and link the GL program from the list of shaders. The linked program is attached to the private material state so that it can be reused if the CoglProgram is used again with the same material. This does mean the program will get relinked if the shader is used with multiple materials. This will be particularly bad if the legacy cogl_program_use function is used because that effectively always makes one-shot materials. This problem will hopefully be alleviated if we make a hash table with a cache of generated programs. The cogl program would then need to become part of the hash lookup. Each CoglProgram now has an age counter which is incremented every time a shader is added. This is used by the material backends to detect when we need to create a new GL program for the user program. The internal _cogl_use_program function now takes a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram. It no longer needs any special differences for GLES2. The GLES2 wrapper function now also uses this function to bind its generated shaders. The ARBfp shaders no longer store a copy of the program source but instead just directly create a program object when cogl_shader_source is called. This avoids having to reupload the source if the same shader is used in multiple materials. There are currently a few gross hacks to get the GLES2 backend to work with this. The problem is that the GLSL material backend is now generating a complete GL program but the GLES2 wrapper still needs to add its fixed function emulation shaders if the program doesn't provide either a vertex or fragment shader. There is a new function in the GLES2 wrapper called _cogl_gles2_use_program which replaces the previous cogl_program_use implementation. It extracts the GL shaders from the GL program object and creates a new GL program containing all of the shaders plus its fixed function emulation. This new program is returned to the GLSL material backend so that it can still flush the custom uniforms using it. The user_program is attached to the GLES2 settings struct as before but its stored using a GL program handle rather than a CoglProgram pointer. This hack will go away once the GLSL material backend replaces the GLES2 wrapper by generating the code itself. Under Mesa this currently generates some GL errors when glClear is called in test-cogl-shader-glsl. I think this is due to a bug in Mesa however. When the user program on the material is changed the GLSL backend gets notified and deletes the GL program that it linked from the user shaders. The program will still be bound in GL however. Leaving a deleted shader bound exposes a bug in Mesa's glClear implementation. More details are here: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31194
2010-10-15 17:00:29 +00:00
cogl: Add a vertend to generate GLSL The GLSL vertend is mostly only useful for GLES2. The fixed function vertend is kept at higher priority than the GLSL vertend so it is unlikely to be used in any other circumstances.
2010-12-02 20:48:45 +00:00
ctx->current_fragment_program_type = type;
}
void
_cogl_use_vertex_program (GLuint gl_program, CoglPipelineProgramType type)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
/* If we're changing program type... */
if (type != ctx->current_vertex_program_type)
{
/* ... disable the old type */
switch (ctx->current_vertex_program_type)
{
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL:
/* If the program contains a fragment shader then we shouldn't
disable it */
if (ctx->current_fragment_program_type !=
COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL)
set_glsl_program (0);
break;
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP:
/* It doesn't make sense to enable ARBfp for the vertex program */
g_assert_not_reached ();
break;
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_FIXED:
/* don't need to to anything */
break;
}
/* ... and enable the new type */
switch (type)
{
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP:
/* It doesn't make sense to enable ARBfp for the vertex program */
g_assert_not_reached ();
break;
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL:
case COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_FIXED:
/* don't need to to anything */
break;
}
}
if (type == COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_GLSL)
{
#ifdef COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_GLSL
set_glsl_program (gl_program);
#else
g_warning ("Unexpected use of GLSL vertend!");
#endif /* COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_GLSL */
}
#ifndef COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_ARBFP
else if (type == COGL_PIPELINE_PROGRAM_TYPE_ARBFP)
g_warning ("Unexpected use of ARBFP vertend!");
#endif /* COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_ARBFP */
ctx->current_vertex_program_type = type;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
#if defined (COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_GLSL) || \
defined (COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_ARBFP)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
int
_cogl_get_max_texture_image_units (void)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, 0);
/* This function is called quite often so we cache the value to
avoid too many GL calls */
if (G_UNLIKELY (ctx->max_texture_image_units == -1))
{
ctx->max_texture_image_units = 1;
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS,
&ctx->max_texture_image_units));
}
return ctx->max_texture_image_units;
}
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GLES
static gboolean
blend_factor_uses_constant (GLenum blend_factor)
{
return (blend_factor == GL_CONSTANT_COLOR ||
blend_factor == GL_ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_COLOR ||
blend_factor == GL_CONSTANT_ALPHA ||
blend_factor == GL_ONE_MINUS_CONSTANT_ALPHA);
}
#endif
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
flush_depth_state (CoglPipelineDepthState *depth_state)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
if (ctx->depth_test_function_cache != depth_state->depth_test_function)
{
GE (glDepthFunc (depth_state->depth_test_function));
ctx->depth_test_function_cache = depth_state->depth_test_function;
}
if (ctx->depth_writing_enabled_cache != depth_state->depth_writing_enabled)
{
GE (glDepthMask (depth_state->depth_writing_enabled ?
GL_TRUE : GL_FALSE));
ctx->depth_writing_enabled_cache = depth_state->depth_writing_enabled;
}
#ifndef COGL_HAS_GLES
if (ctx->depth_range_near_cache != depth_state->depth_range_near ||
ctx->depth_range_far_cache != depth_state->depth_range_far)
{
#ifdef COGL_HAS_GLES2
GE (glDepthRangef (depth_state->depth_range_near,
depth_state->depth_range_far));
#else
GE (glDepthRange (depth_state->depth_range_near,
depth_state->depth_range_far));
#endif
ctx->depth_range_near_cache = depth_state->depth_range_near;
ctx->depth_range_far_cache = depth_state->depth_range_far;
}
#endif /* COGL_HAS_GLES */
}
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_flush_color_blend_alpha_depth_state (
CoglPipeline *pipeline,
unsigned long pipelines_difference,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
gboolean skip_gl_color)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl-vertex-attribute: Use glVertexAttribPointer on GLES2 When the GLES2 wrapper is removed we can't use the fixed function API such as glColorPointer to set the builtin attributes. Instead the GLSL progend now maintains a cache of attribute locations that are queried with glGetAttribLocation. The code that previously maintained a cache of the enabled texture coord arrays has been modified to also cache the enabled vertex attributes under GLES2. The vertex attribute API is now the only place that is using this cache so it has been moved into cogl-vertex-attribute.c
2010-12-03 17:46:16 +00:00
/* On GLES2 we'll flush the color later */
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GLES2
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
if (!skip_gl_color)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if ((pipelines_difference & COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_COLOR) ||
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* Assume if we were previously told to skip the color, then
* the current color needs updating... */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
ctx->current_pipeline_skip_gl_color)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_get_authority (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_COLOR);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GE (glColor4ub (cogl_color_get_red_byte (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_green_byte (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_blue_byte (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_alpha_byte (&authority->color)));
}
}
cogl-vertex-attribute: Use glVertexAttribPointer on GLES2 When the GLES2 wrapper is removed we can't use the fixed function API such as glColorPointer to set the builtin attributes. Instead the GLSL progend now maintains a cache of attribute locations that are queried with glGetAttribLocation. The code that previously maintained a cache of the enabled texture coord arrays has been modified to also cache the enabled vertex attributes under GLES2. The vertex attribute API is now the only place that is using this cache so it has been moved into cogl-vertex-attribute.c
2010-12-03 17:46:16 +00:00
#endif
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (pipelines_difference & COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_BLEND)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_get_authority (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_BLEND);
CoglPipelineBlendState *blend_state =
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
&authority->big_state->blend_state;
#if defined (HAVE_COGL_GLES2)
gboolean have_blend_equation_seperate = TRUE;
gboolean have_blend_func_separate = TRUE;
#elif defined (HAVE_COGL_GL)
gboolean have_blend_equation_seperate = FALSE;
gboolean have_blend_func_separate = FALSE;
if (ctx->drv.pf_glBlendEquationSeparate) /* Only GL 2.0 + */
have_blend_equation_seperate = TRUE;
if (ctx->drv.pf_glBlendFuncSeparate) /* Only GL 1.4 + */
have_blend_func_separate = TRUE;
#endif
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GLES /* GLES 1 only has glBlendFunc */
if (blend_factor_uses_constant (blend_state->blend_src_factor_rgb) ||
blend_factor_uses_constant (blend_state->blend_src_factor_alpha) ||
blend_factor_uses_constant (blend_state->blend_dst_factor_rgb) ||
blend_factor_uses_constant (blend_state->blend_dst_factor_alpha))
{
float red =
cogl_color_get_red_float (&blend_state->blend_constant);
float green =
cogl_color_get_green_float (&blend_state->blend_constant);
float blue =
cogl_color_get_blue_float (&blend_state->blend_constant);
float alpha =
cogl_color_get_alpha_float (&blend_state->blend_constant);
GE (glBlendColor (red, green, blue, alpha));
}
if (have_blend_equation_seperate &&
blend_state->blend_equation_rgb != blend_state->blend_equation_alpha)
GE (glBlendEquationSeparate (blend_state->blend_equation_rgb,
blend_state->blend_equation_alpha));
else
GE (glBlendEquation (blend_state->blend_equation_rgb));
if (have_blend_func_separate &&
(blend_state->blend_src_factor_rgb != blend_state->blend_src_factor_alpha ||
(blend_state->blend_src_factor_rgb !=
blend_state->blend_src_factor_alpha)))
GE (glBlendFuncSeparate (blend_state->blend_src_factor_rgb,
blend_state->blend_dst_factor_rgb,
blend_state->blend_src_factor_alpha,
blend_state->blend_dst_factor_alpha));
else
#endif
GE (glBlendFunc (blend_state->blend_src_factor_rgb,
blend_state->blend_dst_factor_rgb));
}
Remove the fragment shader generation from the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper no longer needs to generate any fragment shader state because the GLSL pipeline backend will always give the wrapper a custom fragment shader. This simplifies a lot of the state comparison done by the wrapper. The fog generation is also removed even though it's actually part of the vertex shader because only the fixed function pipeline backend actually calls the fog functions so it would be disabled when using any of the other backends anyway. We can fix this when the two shader backends also start generating vertex shaders.
2010-11-23 14:47:17 +00:00
/* Under GLES2 the alpha function is implemented as part of the
fragment shader */
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GLES2
cogl: Separate out state flags for the alpha test func and ref Previously the flag to mark the differences for the alpha test function and reference value were conflated into one. However this is awkward when generating shader code to simulate the alpha testing for GLES 2 because in that case changing the function would need a different program but changing the reference value just requires updating a uniform. This patch makes the function and reference have their own state flags.
2010-11-22 18:29:50 +00:00
if (pipelines_difference & (COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALPHA_FUNC |
COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALPHA_FUNC_REFERENCE))
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_get_authority (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALPHA_FUNC);
CoglPipelineAlphaFuncState *alpha_state =
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
&authority->big_state->alpha_state;
/* NB: Currently the Cogl defines are compatible with the GL ones: */
GE (glAlphaFunc (alpha_state->alpha_func,
alpha_state->alpha_func_reference));
}
Remove the fragment shader generation from the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper no longer needs to generate any fragment shader state because the GLSL pipeline backend will always give the wrapper a custom fragment shader. This simplifies a lot of the state comparison done by the wrapper. The fog generation is also removed even though it's actually part of the vertex shader because only the fixed function pipeline backend actually calls the fog functions so it would be disabled when using any of the other backends anyway. We can fix this when the two shader backends also start generating vertex shaders.
2010-11-23 14:47:17 +00:00
#endif /* HAVE_COGL_GLES2 */
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (pipelines_difference & COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_DEPTH)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_get_authority (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_DEPTH);
CoglPipelineDepthState *depth_state = &authority->big_state->depth_state;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
if (depth_state->depth_test_enabled)
{
if (ctx->depth_test_enabled_cache != TRUE)
{
GE (glEnable (GL_DEPTH_TEST));
ctx->depth_test_enabled_cache = depth_state->depth_test_enabled;
}
flush_depth_state (depth_state);
}
else if (ctx->depth_test_enabled_cache != FALSE)
{
GE (glDisable (GL_DEPTH_TEST));
ctx->depth_test_enabled_cache = depth_state->depth_test_enabled;
}
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (pipeline->real_blend_enable != ctx->gl_blend_enable_cache)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (pipeline->real_blend_enable)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GE (glEnable (GL_BLEND));
else
GE (glDisable (GL_BLEND));
/* XXX: we shouldn't update any other blend state if blending
* is disabled! */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
ctx->gl_blend_enable_cache = pipeline->real_blend_enable;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
}
static int
get_max_activateable_texture_units (void)
{
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, 0);
if (G_UNLIKELY (ctx->max_activateable_texture_units == -1))
{
Remove the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper is no longer needed because the shader generation is done within the GLSL fragend and vertend and any functions that are different for GLES2 are now guarded by #ifdefs.
2010-12-05 18:02:05 +00:00
#if defined (HAVE_COGL_GL)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GLint max_tex_coords;
GLint max_combined_tex_units;
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_TEXTURE_COORDS, &max_tex_coords));
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS,
&max_combined_tex_units));
ctx->max_activateable_texture_units =
MAX (max_tex_coords - 1, max_combined_tex_units);
Remove the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper is no longer needed because the shader generation is done within the GLSL fragend and vertend and any functions that are different for GLES2 are now guarded by #ifdefs.
2010-12-05 18:02:05 +00:00
#elif defined (HAVE_COGL_GLES2)
GLint max_vertex_attribs;
GLint max_combined_tex_units;
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_VERTEX_ATTRIBS, &max_vertex_attribs));
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_COMBINED_TEXTURE_IMAGE_UNITS,
&max_combined_tex_units));
/* Two of the vertex attribs need to be used for the position
and color */
ctx->max_activateable_texture_units =
MAX (max_vertex_attribs - 2, max_combined_tex_units);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
#else
GE (glGetIntegerv (GL_MAX_TEXTURE_UNITS,
&ctx->max_activateable_texture_units));
#endif
}
return ctx->max_activateable_texture_units;
}
typedef struct
{
int i;
unsigned long *layer_differences;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
} CoglPipelineFlushLayerState;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
static gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
flush_layers_common_gl_state_cb (CoglPipelineLayer *layer, void *user_data)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineFlushLayerState *flush_state = user_data;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
int unit_index = flush_state->i;
CoglTextureUnit *unit = _cogl_get_texture_unit (unit_index);
unsigned long layers_difference =
flush_state->layer_differences[unit_index];
cogl-pipeline: Use layer overrides as CoglHandles instead of GLuint Since d5634e37 the sliced texture backend now works in terms of CoglTexture2Ds so there's no need to have special casing for overriding the texture of a pipeline layer with a GL handle. Instead we can just use cogl_pipeline_set_layer_texture with the CoglHandle. The special _cogl_pipeline_set_layer_gl_texture_slice function has now been removed and parts of the code for comparing materials have been simplified.
2010-11-11 16:18:25 +00:00
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, FALSE);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* There may not be enough texture units so we can bail out if
* that's the case...
*/
if (G_UNLIKELY (unit_index >= get_max_activateable_texture_units ()))
{
static gboolean shown_warning = FALSE;
if (!shown_warning)
{
g_warning ("Your hardware does not have enough texture units"
"to handle this many texture layers");
shown_warning = TRUE;
}
return FALSE;
}
pipeline: differentiate texture target and data state There are several places where we need to compare the texture state of a pipeline and sometimes we need to take into consideration if the underlying texture has changed but other times we may only care to know if the texture target has changed. For example the fragends typically generate programs that they want to share with all pipelines with equivalent fragment processing state, and in this case when comparing pipelines we only care about the texture targets since changes to the underlying texture won't affect the programs generated. Prior to this we had tried to handle this by passing around some special flags to various functions that evaluate pipeline state to say when we do/don't care about the texture data, but this wasn't working in all cases and was more awkward to manage than the new approach. Now we simply have two state bits: COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_TARGET and COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA and CoglPipelineLayer has an additional target member. Since all the appropriate code takes masks of these state bits to determine what to evaluate we don't need any extra magic flags.
2011-01-11 16:02:06 +00:00
if (layers_difference & COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
pipeline: differentiate texture target and data state There are several places where we need to compare the texture state of a pipeline and sometimes we need to take into consideration if the underlying texture has changed but other times we may only care to know if the texture target has changed. For example the fragends typically generate programs that they want to share with all pipelines with equivalent fragment processing state, and in this case when comparing pipelines we only care about the texture targets since changes to the underlying texture won't affect the programs generated. Prior to this we had tried to handle this by passing around some special flags to various functions that evaluate pipeline state to say when we do/don't care about the texture data, but this wasn't working in all cases and was more awkward to manage than the new approach. Now we simply have two state bits: COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_TARGET and COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA and CoglPipelineLayer has an additional target member. Since all the appropriate code takes masks of these state bits to determine what to evaluate we don't need any extra magic flags.
2011-01-11 16:02:06 +00:00
unsigned long state = COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineLayer *authority =
pipeline: differentiate texture target and data state There are several places where we need to compare the texture state of a pipeline and sometimes we need to take into consideration if the underlying texture has changed but other times we may only care to know if the texture target has changed. For example the fragends typically generate programs that they want to share with all pipelines with equivalent fragment processing state, and in this case when comparing pipelines we only care about the texture targets since changes to the underlying texture won't affect the programs generated. Prior to this we had tried to handle this by passing around some special flags to various functions that evaluate pipeline state to say when we do/don't care about the texture data, but this wasn't working in all cases and was more awkward to manage than the new approach. Now we simply have two state bits: COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_TARGET and COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA and CoglPipelineLayer has an additional target member. Since all the appropriate code takes masks of these state bits to determine what to evaluate we don't need any extra magic flags.
2011-01-11 16:02:06 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_authority (layer, state);
cogl-pipeline: Use layer overrides as CoglHandles instead of GLuint Since d5634e37 the sliced texture backend now works in terms of CoglTexture2Ds so there's no need to have special casing for overriding the texture of a pipeline layer with a GL handle. Instead we can just use cogl_pipeline_set_layer_texture with the CoglHandle. The special _cogl_pipeline_set_layer_gl_texture_slice function has now been removed and parts of the code for comparing materials have been simplified.
2010-11-11 16:18:25 +00:00
CoglHandle texture;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GLuint gl_texture;
GLenum gl_target;
cogl-pipeline: Use layer overrides as CoglHandles instead of GLuint Since d5634e37 the sliced texture backend now works in terms of CoglTexture2Ds so there's no need to have special casing for overriding the texture of a pipeline layer with a GL handle. Instead we can just use cogl_pipeline_set_layer_texture with the CoglHandle. The special _cogl_pipeline_set_layer_gl_texture_slice function has now been removed and parts of the code for comparing materials have been simplified.
2010-11-11 16:18:25 +00:00
texture = (authority->texture == COGL_INVALID_HANDLE ?
ctx->default_gl_texture_2d_tex :
authority->texture);
cogl_texture_get_gl_texture (texture,
&gl_texture,
&gl_target);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
_cogl_set_active_texture_unit (unit_index);
/* NB: There are several Cogl components and some code in
* Clutter that will temporarily bind arbitrary GL textures to
* query and modify texture object parameters. If you look at
* _cogl_bind_gl_texture_transient() you can see we make sure
* that such code always binds to texture unit 1 which means we
* can't rely on the unit->gl_texture state if unit->index == 1.
*
* Because texture unit 1 is a bit special we actually defer any
* necessary glBindTexture for it until the end of
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state().
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*
* NB: we get notified whenever glDeleteTextures is used (see
* _cogl_delete_gl_texture()) where we invalidate
* unit->gl_texture references to deleted textures so it's safe
* to compare unit->gl_texture with gl_texture. (Without the
* hook it would be possible to delete a GL texture and create a
* new one with the same name and comparing unit->gl_texture and
* gl_texture wouldn't detect that.)
*
* NB: for foreign textures we don't know how the deletion of
* the GL texture objects correspond to the deletion of the
* CoglTextures so if there was previously a foreign texture
* associated with the texture unit then we can't assume that we
* aren't seeing a recycled texture name so we have to bind.
*/
if (unit->gl_texture != gl_texture || unit->is_foreign)
{
Always bind a new texture to unit 1 when necessary The special handling for texture unit 1 caught the case where unit 1 was changed for transient purposes, but didn't properly handle the case where the actual non-transient texture was different between two materials with no transient binding in between. If the actual texture has changed when flushing, mark unit 1 as dirty and needing a rebind. http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2261
2010-08-09 19:06:35 +00:00
if (unit_index == 1)
unit->dirty_gl_texture = TRUE;
else
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GE (glBindTexture (gl_target, gl_texture));
unit->gl_texture = gl_texture;
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
unit->gl_target = gl_target;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
unit->is_foreign = _cogl_texture_is_foreign (texture);
/* The texture_storage_changed boolean indicates if the
* CoglTexture's underlying GL texture storage has changed since
* it was flushed to the texture unit. We've just flushed the
* latest state so we can reset this. */
unit->texture_storage_changed = FALSE;
}
Remove the fragment shader generation from the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper no longer needs to generate any fragment shader state because the GLSL pipeline backend will always give the wrapper a custom fragment shader. This simplifies a lot of the state comparison done by the wrapper. The fog generation is also removed even though it's actually part of the vertex shader because only the fixed function pipeline backend actually calls the fog functions so it would be disabled when using any of the other backends anyway. We can fix this when the two shader backends also start generating vertex shaders.
2010-11-23 14:47:17 +00:00
/* Under GLES2 the fragment shader will use gl_PointCoord instead of
replacing the texture coordinates */
#ifndef HAVE_COGL_GLES2
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (layers_difference & COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_POINT_SPRITE_COORDS)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineState change = COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_POINT_SPRITE_COORDS;
CoglPipelineLayer *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_authority (layer, change);
CoglPipelineLayerBigState *big_state = authority->big_state;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
_cogl_set_active_texture_unit (unit_index);
GE (glTexEnvi (GL_POINT_SPRITE, GL_COORD_REPLACE,
big_state->point_sprite_coords));
}
Remove the fragment shader generation from the GLES2 wrapper The GLES2 wrapper no longer needs to generate any fragment shader state because the GLSL pipeline backend will always give the wrapper a custom fragment shader. This simplifies a lot of the state comparison done by the wrapper. The fog generation is also removed even though it's actually part of the vertex shader because only the fixed function pipeline backend actually calls the fog functions so it would be disabled when using any of the other backends anyway. We can fix this when the two shader backends also start generating vertex shaders.
2010-11-23 14:47:17 +00:00
#endif /* HAVE_COGL_GLES2 */
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl_handle_ref (layer);
if (unit->layer != COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
cogl_handle_unref (unit->layer);
unit->layer = layer;
unit->layer_changes_since_flush = 0;
flush_state->i++;
return TRUE;
}
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_flush_common_gl_state (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
unsigned long pipelines_difference,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
unsigned long *layer_differences,
gboolean skip_gl_color)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineFlushLayerState state;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_flush_color_blend_alpha_depth_state (pipeline,
pipelines_difference,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
skip_gl_color);
state.i = 0;
state.layer_differences = layer_differences;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer_internal (pipeline,
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 20:33:26 +00:00
flush_layers_common_gl_state_cb,
&state);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
/* Re-assert the layer's wrap modes on the given CoglTexture.
*
* Note: we don't simply forward the wrap modes to layer->texture
* since the actual texture being used may have been overridden.
*/
static void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_forward_wrap_modes (CoglPipelineLayer *layer,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
CoglHandle texture)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineWrapModeInternal wrap_mode_s, wrap_mode_t, wrap_mode_p;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
GLenum gl_wrap_mode_s, gl_wrap_mode_t, gl_wrap_mode_p;
if (texture == COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
return;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_wrap_modes (layer,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
&wrap_mode_s,
&wrap_mode_t,
&wrap_mode_p);
/* Update the wrap mode on the texture object. The texture backend
should cache the value so that it will be a no-op if the object
already has the same wrap mode set. The backend is best placed to
do this because it knows how many of the coordinates will
actually be used (ie, a 1D texture only cares about the 's'
coordinate but a 3D texture would use all three). GL uses the
wrap mode as part of the texture object state but we are
pretending it's part of the per-layer environment state. This
will break if the application tries to use different modes in
different layers using the same texture. */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (wrap_mode_s == COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_INTERNAL_AUTOMATIC)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
gl_wrap_mode_s = GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE;
else
gl_wrap_mode_s = wrap_mode_s;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (wrap_mode_t == COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_INTERNAL_AUTOMATIC)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
gl_wrap_mode_t = GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE;
else
gl_wrap_mode_t = wrap_mode_t;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (wrap_mode_p == COGL_PIPELINE_WRAP_MODE_INTERNAL_AUTOMATIC)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
gl_wrap_mode_p = GL_CLAMP_TO_EDGE;
else
gl_wrap_mode_p = wrap_mode_p;
_cogl_texture_set_wrap_mode_parameters (texture,
gl_wrap_mode_s,
gl_wrap_mode_t,
gl_wrap_mode_p);
}
/* OpenGL associates the min/mag filters and repeat modes with the
* texture object not the texture unit so we always have to re-assert
* the filter and repeat modes whenever we use a texture since it may
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* be referenced by multiple pipelines with different modes.
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*
* XXX: GL_ARB_sampler_objects fixes this in OpenGL so we should
* eventually look at using this extension when available.
*/
static void
foreach_texture_unit_update_filter_and_wrap_modes (void)
{
int i;
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
for (i = 0; i < ctx->texture_units->len; i++)
{
CoglTextureUnit *unit =
&g_array_index (ctx->texture_units, CoglTextureUnit, i);
if (unit->layer)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglHandle texture = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_texture (unit->layer);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
if (texture != COGL_INVALID_HANDLE)
{
CoglPipelineFilter min;
CoglPipelineFilter mag;
_cogl_pipeline_layer_get_filters (unit->layer, &min, &mag);
_cogl_texture_set_filters (texture, min, mag);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_forward_wrap_modes (unit->layer, texture);
}
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
}
}
typedef struct
{
int i;
unsigned long *layer_differences;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
} CoglPipelineCompareLayersState;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
static gboolean
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
compare_layer_differences_cb (CoglPipelineLayer *layer, void *user_data)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineCompareLayersState *state = user_data;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
CoglTextureUnit *unit = _cogl_get_texture_unit (state->i);
if (unit->layer == layer)
state->layer_differences[state->i] = unit->layer_changes_since_flush;
else if (unit->layer)
{
state->layer_differences[state->i] = unit->layer_changes_since_flush;
state->layer_differences[state->i] |=
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_layer_compare_differences (layer, unit->layer);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
else
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
state->layer_differences[state->i] = COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_ALL_SPARSE;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* XXX: There is always a possibility that a CoglTexture's
* underlying GL texture storage has been changed since it was last
* bound to a texture unit which is why we have a callback into
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_texture_storage_change_notify whenever a textures
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* underlying GL texture storage changes which will set the
* unit->texture_intern_changed flag. If we see that's been set here
* then we force an update of the texture state...
*/
if (unit->texture_storage_changed)
pipeline: differentiate texture target and data state There are several places where we need to compare the texture state of a pipeline and sometimes we need to take into consideration if the underlying texture has changed but other times we may only care to know if the texture target has changed. For example the fragends typically generate programs that they want to share with all pipelines with equivalent fragment processing state, and in this case when comparing pipelines we only care about the texture targets since changes to the underlying texture won't affect the programs generated. Prior to this we had tried to handle this by passing around some special flags to various functions that evaluate pipeline state to say when we do/don't care about the texture data, but this wasn't working in all cases and was more awkward to manage than the new approach. Now we simply have two state bits: COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_TARGET and COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA and CoglPipelineLayer has an additional target member. Since all the appropriate code takes masks of these state bits to determine what to evaluate we don't need any extra magic flags.
2011-01-11 16:02:06 +00:00
state->layer_differences[state->i] |=
COGL_PIPELINE_LAYER_STATE_TEXTURE_DATA;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
state->i++;
return TRUE;
}
typedef struct
{
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
const CoglPipelineFragend *fragend;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
unsigned long *layer_differences;
gboolean error_adding_layer;
gboolean added_layer;
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
} CoglPipelineFragendAddLayerState;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
static gboolean
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
fragend_add_layer_cb (CoglPipelineLayer *layer,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
void *user_data)
{
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
CoglPipelineFragendAddLayerState *state = user_data;
const CoglPipelineFragend *fragend = state->fragend;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipeline *pipeline = state->pipeline;
int unit_index = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_unit_index (layer);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, FALSE);
/* Either generate per layer code snippets or setup the
* fixed function glTexEnv for each layer... */
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
if (G_LIKELY (fragend->add_layer (pipeline,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
layer,
state->layer_differences[unit_index])))
state->added_layer = TRUE;
else
{
state->error_adding_layer = TRUE;
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
cogl: Add a fixed function vertend The vertends are intended to flush state that would be represented in a vertex program. Code to handle the layer matrix, lighting and point size has now been moved from the common cogl-pipeline-opengl backend to the fixed vertend.
2010-11-29 18:32:21 +00:00
typedef struct
{
const CoglPipelineVertend *vertend;
CoglPipeline *pipeline;
unsigned long *layer_differences;
gboolean error_adding_layer;
gboolean added_layer;
} CoglPipelineVertendAddLayerState;
static gboolean
vertend_add_layer_cb (CoglPipelineLayer *layer,
void *user_data)
{
CoglPipelineVertendAddLayerState *state = user_data;
const CoglPipelineVertend *vertend = state->vertend;
CoglPipeline *pipeline = state->pipeline;
int unit_index = _cogl_pipeline_layer_get_unit_index (layer);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, FALSE);
/* Either enerate per layer code snippets or setup the
* fixed function matrix uniforms for each layer... */
if (G_LIKELY (vertend->add_layer (pipeline,
layer,
state->layer_differences[unit_index])))
state->added_layer = TRUE;
else
{
state->error_adding_layer = TRUE;
return FALSE;
}
return TRUE;
}
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* _cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state:
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*
* Details of override options:
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* ->fallback_mask: is a bitmask of the pipeline layers that need to be
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* replaced with the default, fallback textures. The fallback textures are
* fully transparent textures so they hopefully wont contribute to the
* texture combining.
*
* The intention of fallbacks is to try and preserve
* the number of layers the user is expecting so that texture coordinates
* they gave will mostly still correspond to the textures they intended, and
* have a fighting chance of looking close to their originally intended
* result.
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* ->disable_mask: is a bitmask of the pipeline layers that will simply have
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* texturing disabled. It's only really intended for disabling all layers
* > X; i.e. we'd expect to see a contiguous run of 0 starting from the LSB
* and at some point the remaining bits flip to 1. It might work to disable
* arbitrary layers; though I'm not sure a.t.m how OpenGL would take to
* that.
*
* The intention of the disable_mask is for emitting geometry when the user
* hasn't supplied enough texture coordinates for all the layers and it's
* not possible to auto generate default texture coordinates for those
* layers.
*
* ->layer0_override_texture: forcibly tells us to bind this GL texture name for
* layer 0 instead of plucking the gl_texture from the CoglTexture of layer
* 0.
*
* The intention of this is for any primitives that supports sliced textures.
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* The code will can iterate each of the slices and re-flush the pipeline
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* forcing the GL texture of each slice in turn.
*
* ->wrap_mode_overrides: overrides the wrap modes set on each
* layer. This is used to implement the automatic wrap mode.
*
* XXX: It might also help if we could specify a texture matrix for code
* dealing with slicing that would be multiplied with the users own matrix.
*
* Normaly texture coords in the range [0, 1] refer to the extents of the
* texture, but when your GL texture represents a slice of the real texture
* (from the users POV) then a texture matrix would be a neat way of
* transforming the mapping for each slice.
*
* Currently for textured rectangles we manually calculate the texture
* coords for each slice based on the users given coords, but this solution
* isn't ideal, and can't be used with CoglVertexBuffers.
*/
void
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_flush_gl_state (CoglPipeline *pipeline,
Revert "cogl: Remove the generated array size for cogl_tex_coord_in" This reverts commit 4cfe90bde275dbb952645397aa2ba2d6f6e2f3ba. GLSL 1.00 on GLES doesn't support unsized arrays so the whole idea can't work. Conflicts: clutter/cogl/cogl/cogl-pipeline-glsl.c
2010-12-02 21:08:30 +00:00
gboolean skip_gl_color,
int n_tex_coord_attribs)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
unsigned long pipelines_difference;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
int n_layers;
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
unsigned long *layer_differences;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
int i;
CoglTextureUnit *unit1;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
COGL_STATIC_TIMER (pipeline_flush_timer,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
"Mainloop", /* parent */
"Material Flush",
"The time spent flushing material state",
0 /* no application private data */);
_COGL_GET_CONTEXT (ctx, NO_RETVAL);
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
COGL_TIMER_START (_cogl_uprof_context, pipeline_flush_timer);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
if (ctx->current_pipeline == pipeline)
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
{
/* Bail out asap if we've been asked to re-flush the already current
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* pipeline and we can see the pipeline hasn't changed */
pipeline: don't skip flush if skip_gl_color flag differs We try and bail out of flushing pipeline state asap if we can see the pipeline has already been flushed and hasn't changed but we weren't checking to see if the skip_gl_color flag is the same as when it was last flush too and so we'd sometimes bail out without updating the glColor correctly.
2011-01-11 14:10:11 +00:00
if (ctx->current_pipeline_age == pipeline->age &&
ctx->current_pipeline_skip_gl_color == skip_gl_color)
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
goto done;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipelines_difference = ctx->current_pipeline_changes_since_flush;
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
else if (ctx->current_pipeline)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipelines_difference = ctx->current_pipeline_changes_since_flush;
pipelines_difference |=
_cogl_pipeline_compare_differences (ctx->current_pipeline,
pipeline);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
else
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
pipelines_difference = COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_ALL_SPARSE;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* Get a layer_differences mask for each layer to be flushed */
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
n_layers = cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
if (n_layers)
{
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
CoglPipelineCompareLayersState state;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
layer_differences = g_alloca (sizeof (unsigned long *) * n_layers);
memset (layer_differences, 0, sizeof (layer_differences));
state.i = 0;
state.layer_differences = layer_differences;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer_internal (pipeline,
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 20:33:26 +00:00
compare_layer_differences_cb,
&state);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
else
layer_differences = NULL;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* First flush everything that's the same regardless of which
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* pipeline backend is being used...
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*
* 1) top level state:
* glColor (or skip if a vertex attribute is being used for color)
* blend state
* alpha test state (except for GLES 2.0)
*
* 2) then foreach layer:
* determine gl_target/gl_texture
* bind texture
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* Note: After _cogl_pipeline_flush_common_gl_state you can expect
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* all state of the layers corresponding texture unit to be
* updated.
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_flush_common_gl_state (pipeline,
pipelines_difference,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
layer_differences,
skip_gl_color);
/* Now flush the fragment processing state according to the current
* fragment processing backend.
*
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* Note: Some of the backends may not support the current pipeline
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* configuration and in that case it will report an error and we
* will fallback to a different backend.
*
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
* NB: if pipeline->backend != COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_UNDEFINED then
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* we have previously managed to successfully flush this pipeline
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* with the given backend so we will simply use that to avoid
* fallback code paths.
*/
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
if (pipeline->fragend == COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_UNDEFINED)
_cogl_pipeline_set_fragend (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_FRAGEND_DEFAULT);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
for (i = pipeline->fragend;
i < G_N_ELEMENTS (_cogl_pipeline_fragends);
i++, _cogl_pipeline_set_fragend (pipeline, i))
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
const CoglPipelineFragend *fragend = _cogl_pipeline_fragends[i];
CoglPipelineFragendAddLayerState state;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
/* E.g. For fragends generating code they can setup their
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* scratch buffers here... */
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (!fragend->start (pipeline,
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
n_layers,
Revert "cogl: Remove the generated array size for cogl_tex_coord_in" This reverts commit 4cfe90bde275dbb952645397aa2ba2d6f6e2f3ba. GLSL 1.00 on GLES doesn't support unsized arrays so the whole idea can't work. Conflicts: clutter/cogl/cogl/cogl-pipeline-glsl.c
2010-12-02 21:08:30 +00:00
pipelines_difference,
n_tex_coord_attribs)))
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
continue;
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
state.fragend = fragend;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
state.pipeline = pipeline;
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
state.layer_differences = layer_differences;
state.error_adding_layer = FALSE;
state.added_layer = FALSE;
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer_internal (pipeline,
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
fragend_add_layer_cb,
material: Adds experimental cogl_material_foreach_layer API This adds a way to iterate the layer indices of the given material since cogl_material_get_layers has been deprecated. The user provides a callback to be called once for each layer. Because modification of layers in the callback may potentially invalidate any number of the internal CoglMaterialLayer structures and invalidate the material's layer cache this should be more robust than cogl_material_get_layers() which used to return a const GList * pointing directly to internal state.
2010-07-05 20:33:26 +00:00
&state);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (state.error_adding_layer))
continue;
if (!state.added_layer &&
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
fragend->passthrough &&
G_UNLIKELY (!fragend->passthrough (pipeline)))
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
continue;
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
/* For fragends generating code they may compile and link their
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* programs here, update any uniforms and tell OpenGL to use
* that program.
*/
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (!fragend->end (pipeline, pipelines_difference)))
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
continue;
break;
}
Rename CoglPipelineBackend to CoglPipelineFragend The current Cogl pipeline backends are entirely concerned with the fragment processing state. We also want to eventually have separate backends to generate shaders for the vertex processing state so we need to rename the fragment backends. 'Fragend' is a somewhat weird name but we wanted to avoid ending up with illegible symbols like CoglPipelineFragmentBackendGlslPrivate.
2010-11-29 16:56:41 +00:00
if (G_UNLIKELY (i >= G_N_ELEMENTS (_cogl_pipeline_fragends)))
g_warning ("No usable pipeline fragment backend was found!");
Add a warning message when no usable Cogl pipeline backend is found If none of the pipeline backends can handle the state then it now displays a warning so the developer has a chance to work out what's going on.
2010-11-24 17:37:55 +00:00
cogl: Add a fixed function vertend The vertends are intended to flush state that would be represented in a vertex program. Code to handle the layer matrix, lighting and point size has now been moved from the common cogl-pipeline-opengl backend to the fixed vertend.
2010-11-29 18:32:21 +00:00
/* Now flush the vertex processing state according to the current
* vertex processing backend.
*/
if (pipeline->vertend == COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_UNDEFINED)
_cogl_pipeline_set_vertend (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_VERTEND_DEFAULT);
for (i = pipeline->vertend;
i < G_N_ELEMENTS (_cogl_pipeline_vertends);
i++, _cogl_pipeline_set_vertend (pipeline, i))
{
const CoglPipelineVertend *vertend = _cogl_pipeline_vertends[i];
CoglPipelineVertendAddLayerState state;
/* E.g. For vertends generating code they can setup their
* scratch buffers here... */
if (G_UNLIKELY (!vertend->start (pipeline,
n_layers,
pipelines_difference)))
continue;
state.vertend = vertend;
state.pipeline = pipeline;
state.layer_differences = layer_differences;
state.error_adding_layer = FALSE;
state.added_layer = FALSE;
_cogl_pipeline_foreach_layer_internal (pipeline,
vertend_add_layer_cb,
&state);
if (G_UNLIKELY (state.error_adding_layer))
continue;
/* For vertends generating code they may compile and link their
* programs here, update any uniforms and tell OpenGL to use
* that program.
*/
if (G_UNLIKELY (!vertend->end (pipeline, pipelines_difference)))
continue;
break;
}
if (G_UNLIKELY (i >= G_N_ELEMENTS (_cogl_pipeline_vertends)))
g_warning ("No usable pipeline vertex backend was found!");
cogl: Add a GLSL 'progend' 'progend' is short for 'program backend'. The progend is intended to operate on combined state from a fragment backend and a vertex backend. The progend has an 'end' function which is run whenever the pipeline is flushed and the two pipeline change notification functions. All of the progends are run whenever the pipeline is flushed instead of selecting a single one because it is possible that multiple progends may be in use for example if the vertends and fragends are different. The GLSL progend will take the shaders generated by the fragend and vertend and link them into a single program. The fragend code has been changed to only generate the shader and not the program. The idea is that pipelines can share fragment shader objects even if their vertex state is different. The authority for the progend needs to be the combined authority on the vertend and fragend state.
2010-12-02 14:00:46 +00:00
for (i = 0; i < COGL_PIPELINE_N_PROGENDS; i++)
if (_cogl_pipeline_progends[i]->end)
_cogl_pipeline_progends[i]->end (pipeline, pipelines_difference,
n_tex_coord_attribs);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* FIXME: This reference is actually resulting in lots of
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* copy-on-write reparenting because one-shot pipelines end up
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* living for longer than necessary and so any later modification of
* the parent will cause a copy-on-write.
*
* XXX: The issue should largely go away when we switch to using
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* weak pipelines for overrides.
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
*/
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
cogl_object_ref (pipeline);
if (ctx->current_pipeline != NULL)
cogl_object_unref (ctx->current_pipeline);
ctx->current_pipeline = pipeline;
ctx->current_pipeline_changes_since_flush = 0;
ctx->current_pipeline_skip_gl_color = skip_gl_color;
ctx->current_pipeline_age = pipeline->age;
material: Bail out faster if re-flushing unchanged material This allows _cogl_material_flush_gl_state to bail out faster if repeatedly asked to flush the same material and we can see the material hasn't changed. Since we can rely on the material age incrementing when any material property changes or any associated layer property changes then we can track the age of the material after flushing so it can be compared with the age of the material if it is subsequently re-flushed. If the age is the same we only have to re-assert the texture object state.
2010-10-26 18:02:04 +00:00
done:
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
cogl-vertex-attribute: Use glVertexAttribPointer on GLES2 When the GLES2 wrapper is removed we can't use the fixed function API such as glColorPointer to set the builtin attributes. Instead the GLSL progend now maintains a cache of attribute locations that are queried with glGetAttribLocation. The code that previously maintained a cache of the enabled texture coord arrays has been modified to also cache the enabled vertex attributes under GLES2. The vertex attribute API is now the only place that is using this cache so it has been moved into cogl-vertex-attribute.c
2010-12-03 17:46:16 +00:00
/* We can't assume the color will be retained between flushes on
GLES2 because the generic attribute values are not stored as part
of the program object so they could be overridden by any
attribute changes in another program */
#ifdef HAVE_COGL_GLES2
if (!skip_gl_color)
{
int attribute;
CoglPipeline *authority =
_cogl_pipeline_get_authority (pipeline, COGL_PIPELINE_STATE_COLOR);
attribute = _cogl_pipeline_progend_glsl_get_color_attribute (pipeline);
if (attribute != -1)
GE (glVertexAttrib4f (attribute,
cogl_color_get_red_float (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_green_float (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_blue_float (&authority->color),
cogl_color_get_alpha_float (&authority->color)));
}
#endif
cogl: upload matrices with uniforms on GLES2 Once the GLES2 wrapper is removed we won't be able to upload the matrices with the fixed function API any more. The fixed function API gives a global state for setting the matrix but if a custom shader uniform is used for the matrices then the state is per program. _cogl_matrix_stack_flush_to_gl is called in a few places and it is assumed the current pipeline doesn't need to be flushed before it is called. To allow these semantics to continue to work, on GLES2 the matrix flush now just stores a reference to the matrix stack in the CoglContext. A pre_paint virtual is added to the progend which is called whenever a pipeline is flushed, even if the same pipeline was flushed already. This gives the GLSL progend a chance to upload the matrices to the uniforms. The combined modelview/projection matrix is only calculated if it is used. The generated programs end up never using the modelview or projection matrix so it usually only has to upload the combined matrix. When a matrix stack is flushed a reference is taked to it by the pipeline progend and the age is stored so that if the same state is used with the same program again then we don't need to reupload the uniform.
2010-12-06 12:31:51 +00:00
/* Give any progends a chance to update any uniforms that might not
depend on the material state. This is used on GLES2 to update the
matrices */
for (i = 0; i < COGL_PIPELINE_N_PROGENDS; i++)
if (_cogl_pipeline_progends[i]->pre_paint)
_cogl_pipeline_progends[i]->pre_paint (pipeline);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
/* Handle the fact that OpenGL associates texture filter and wrap
* modes with the texture objects not the texture units... */
foreach_texture_unit_update_filter_and_wrap_modes ();
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
/* If this pipeline has more than one layer then we always need
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* to make sure we rebind the texture for unit 1.
*
* NB: various components of Cogl may temporarily bind arbitrary
* textures to texture unit 1 so they can query and modify texture
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
* object parameters. cogl-pipeline.c (See
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
* _cogl_bind_gl_texture_transient)
*/
unit1 = _cogl_get_texture_unit (1);
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
if (cogl_pipeline_get_n_layers (pipeline) > 1 && unit1->dirty_gl_texture)
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
{
_cogl_set_active_texture_unit (1);
cogl-pipeline: Move texture enabling/disabling to fixed fragend Previously enabling and disabling textures was done whatever the backend in cogl-pipeline-opengl. However enabling and disabling texture targets only has any meaning if no fragment shaders are being used so this patch moves the code to cogl-pipeline-fragend-fixed. The GLES2 wrapper has also been changed to ignore enabledness when deciding whether to update texture coordinate attribute pointers.
2010-11-30 12:48:27 +00:00
GE (glBindTexture (unit1->gl_target, unit1->gl_texture));
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
unit1->dirty_gl_texture = FALSE;
}
cogl: rename CoglMaterial -> CoglPipeline This applies an API naming change that's been deliberated over for a while now which is to rename CoglMaterial to CoglPipeline. For now the new pipeline API is marked as experimental and public headers continue to talk about materials not pipelines. The CoglMaterial API is now maintained in terms of the cogl_pipeline API internally. Currently this API is targeting Cogl 2.0 so we will have time to integrate it properly with other upcoming Cogl 2.0 work. The basic reasons for the rename are: - That the term "material" implies to many people that they are constrained to fragment processing; perhaps as some kind of high-level texture abstraction. - In Clutter they get exposed by ClutterTexture actors which may be re-inforcing this misconception. - When comparing how other frameworks use the term material, a material sometimes describes a multi-pass fragment processing technique which isn't the case in Cogl. - In code, "CoglPipeline" will hopefully be a much more self documenting summary of what these objects represent; a full GPU pipeline configuration including, for example, vertex processing, fragment processing and blending. - When considering the API documentation story, at some point we need a document introducing developers to how the "GPU pipeline" works so it should become intuitive that CoglPipeline maps back to that description of the GPU pipeline. - This is consistent in terminology and concept to OpenGL 4's new pipeline object which is a container for program objects. Note: The cogl-material.[ch] files have been renamed to cogl-material-compat.[ch] because otherwise git doesn't seem to treat the change as a moving the old cogl-material.c->cogl-pipeline.c and so we loose all our git-blame history.
2010-10-27 17:54:57 +00:00
COGL_TIMER_STOP (_cogl_uprof_context, pipeline_flush_timer);
material: splits out all the state flushing code This moves the code supporting _cogl_material_flush_gl_state into cogl-material-opengl.c as part of an effort to reduce the size of cogl-material.c to keep it manageable.
2010-07-10 02:40:47 +00:00
}
material: split the texture unit management out In general cogl-material.c has become far to large to manage in one source file. As one of the ways to try and break it down this patch starts to move some of lower level texture unit state management out into cogl-material-opengl.c. The naming is such because the plan is to follow up and migrate the very GL specific state flushing code into the same file.
2010-07-10 01:53:38 +00:00
Reference in New Issue Copy Permalink