The dialog is shown at session start, which right now means in the
regular session, however the plan is to start the session in the
overview. When that happens, the "Take the Tour" button should get
the user to the Tour without additonal actions.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1699>
Right now the rowSpacing and columSpacing of the layout strategy is
calculated by looking at the overlapping sizes of the close button and
the app icon of the WindowPreview, plus a constant spacing read from CSS
by the WorkspaceLayout that's added to that. We're not factoring in the
extra size of the scaled-up WindowPreviews here and instead depend on
the constant spacing being large enough. If we don't want to depend on
the spacing here, we should add the scaled-up extra size to the sizes
returned by chromeWidths() and chromeHeights().
Since the last commits all previews scale up by the same amount of
pixels, so we can now just add that size to the values returned by
chromeWidths() and chromeHeights().
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1692>
Scaling differently sized WindowPreviews by a constant factor will
result in smaller windows getting enlarged by a smaller amount of pixels
than larger windows (1000*1.02=1020 but 100*1.02=102, one will grow by
20 pixels and the other one by 2), this can look a bit weird because
smaller windows don't scale up as much as larger windows.
So introduce a constant extra size to use when scaling windows up, we
set only the half size there because we want to ensure that the size
added on both sides is not fractional and we remain aligned to the pixel
grid.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1692>
Right now the spacing between icon and title works using a little trick
that doesn't really seem intended: The title is offset by
(icon-height * ICON_OVERLAP), when the icon is actually overlapping the
preview by ICON_OVERLAP, and *overflowing* the preview by
(1 - ICON_OVERLAP).
So correct that and offset the title by
(icon-height * (1 - ICON_OVERLAP)), and since now there's no spacing
anymore, add a proper ICON_TITLE_SPACING to that offset.
Also add the new ICON_TITLE_SPACING to the overlapHeight, where the
spacing was ignored so far.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1692>
The scale property tracks the relative size at which we display thumbnails
given the space we have available.
That assumes that the allocation represents that available space, but it will
actually be smaller while the minimap itself is collapsing.
Luckily we have an easy option to avoid a distorted scale: Just don't update
it while collapsing. We expect scale changes when adding or removing thumbnails,
but as we freeze those during transitions, we can do the same with the scale.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3739
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1696>
Right now the minimap only hides itself in case of a single static
workspace. That's not only an edge case, but also not expected to
change while the overview is visible, so changing the visibility
without a transition is fine.
However that is about to change, and we'll hide the minimap as well
when there are fewer than three workspaces. As that condition is
very much expected to change from within the overview, the transition
should be animated.
Implement that via a new :collapse-fraction property on ThumbnailsBox,
and use that to transition both the height of the box itself and the
scale of the individual thumbnails.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3739
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1696>
We currently have two components that show or hide the minimap:
- the thumbnails hide themselves in case of a single static workspace
- overview controls show the minimap when no search is active
That obviously doesn't work correctly.
To fix this, change thumbnails to set a new :should-show property instead
of the visibility, and let the overview controls take it into account
when changing the visibility.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3739
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1696>
A small mistake snuck in right before landing the previous commit and
the box-shadow was moved 4px vertically above the wallpaper instead of
below it. Fix that and put it 4px below the wallpaper.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1697>
According to the GNOME 40 mockups, add a box-shadow to the workspace
background. For this to work, we also need a background-color (St
limitations), and to make sure that background-color doesn't bleed over
the rounded corners of the wallpaper, we also need to tell St to use a
border-radius and clip the background-color painting using a rounded
path.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1651>
As planned and shown in the mockups for GNOME 40, round the corners of
the background wallpaper of workspaces.
To do that we use the new rounded-clipping support of
MetaBackgroundContent and we animate the radius by attaching it to the
stateAdjustment just like everything else.
Because we show only a part of the wallpaper and "cut away" the area of
the panel in WorkspaceBackgrounds vfunc_allocate(), we also need to set
the rounded clips bounding rect to the rectangle we're actually showing,
otherwise the texture would be rounded in the region that's cut away.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1651>
This is the same as the vertical swipe gesture, but for keyboard
junkies: Analoguous to the <super><alt>left/right shortcuts for
switching between workspaces, add <super><alt>up/down to shift
between session, window picker and app grid.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1695>
When commit 3a9acb96 moved around padding to extend the clickable
area to the screen edge, it reduced the inner padding too much and
the running indicator ended up outside the highlighted area.
Adjust the padding to put it back into its place.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1693>
The animation handling is kinda split between layout (for the
keyboard slide), and keyboard (for the focus window slide). It
would be nice to have more fine grained control on those, so
move the animation handling altogether to keyboard.js as a start.
This is roughly similar, except that transformations apply to
the Keyboard actor, instead of the keyboardBox (its parent). We
now queue a relayout after the animation in order to update the
chrome tracking.
The only layering break now is that we emit
layoutManager::keyboard-visible-changed in keyboard.js, its
purpose will be dropped in future commits, so leave it there for
now.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1668>
Gestures leaving the overview from a short distance result in an
ugly effect with the panel opacity transitionhaving a fixed duration.
Make this transition have the same duration (although in a hackish
way) so we avoid the ugly effect.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
The gesture internally manipulates the main adjustment so one swipe
up brings up the overview, and a second swipe up brings the app
grid. The gesture also works in the other direction to get out of
the overview.
Internally, this is delegated on the OverviewControls, so the
adjustment is not leaked out of there. This however meant open
coding the gesture interaction so it can be directed from
overview.js code.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
This will be set whenever an event controller is manipulating the adjustment.
It should enter the same transitional state it does for animations. This
will be used by the overview gesture.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
Separate this logic from _switchWorkspaceBegin() and ensure it is set
before this call. The SwipeTracker code uses the orientation to determine
whether the gesture should begin at all, so changing the orientation on
gesture begin was a bit too late.
But also, that meant the SwipeTracker was left at the default orientation,
which was vertical (unlike workspaces, and like the overview gesture).
This made both swipe trackers try to handle the same swipe, with the
WorkspacesView being doubly unfortunate (for triggering in the first place,
and for happening after the other gesture did queue relayouts on it).
Taking this logic outside of _switchWorkspaceBegin() and having the right
orientation beforehand results in both gestures looking for their direction,
and not meddle with each other.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
We now have multiple touch swipe gestures with matching fingers and
different directions set on the overview hierarchy. Accepting all
touch swipes without checking the direction makes one of these gestures
take control of input, without other gestures having a say on this.
So, look for the direction of the touch events and look if it matches
the expected orientation before accepting the gesture.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
Make the touchpad gesture keep track of its state, and enter in a
rejected state if the swipe is happening in the wrong direction.
Effectively, this means touchpad gestures are locked on a single
direction, and horizontal+vertical swipeTrackers won't be handling
events at the same time.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
We now have multiple touch swipe gestures with matching fingers and
different directions set on the overview hierarchy. Accepting all
touchpad swipes without checking the direction makes one of these gestures
take control of input, without other gestures having a say on this.
So, look for the direction of the swipe events and look if it matches
the expected orientation.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1643>
