The slide of thumbnailWorkspace is shown when entering overview,
connecting to the same signal that creates the thumbnails, the showing
signal of overview, but, to make the slide animation we need to know how
much width the slider has. To do that we ask the thumbnailsWorkspace
about its width, but given that it connects to the same signal it could
ask the width without having created the thumbnails yet, so reporting a
width of 0 and confusing the slide animation.
Currently it works because gjs calls the callbacks following the order
of the clients connecting that signal, and the thumbnailsWorskpace is
connected before the slide ones.
To avoid that we allow to request the preferred size of the
thumbnailsBox at any time with any number of thumbnails. The only thing
required is to make sure the porthole is accessible when requesting the
preferred size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732901
We were calling twice showPage() with the correct page, here and in
show() / zoomFromOverview given that _resetShowAppsbutton was called
from the signal 'showing' of overview. Given that the call to
_resetShowAppsbutton is only actually used when hiding the overview we
can actually put the checked state of the button to false when animating
from overview so it shows the workspace page, causing the same behavior
of _resetShowAppsbutton without all the shenanigans of resetting when
the hiding overview signal is triggered.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732901
Currently the indicators are a BoxLayout inside a BinLayout in AllView.
BinLayout doesn't have any size constraint, so if the indicators request
a bigger size than AllView the entire overview is grown, causing the
overview to go crazy.
To avoid that, create an actor for the page indicators that request as
minimum size 0, and as a natural size, the sum of all indicators natural
sizes. Then we clip_to_allocation, so it doesn't grow more than the
parent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=723496
If the application reports itself as single window (through
an explicit indication in the desktop file or some heuristics),
not show a "New window" item that doesn't actually open a new window.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722554
Both Panel.ActivitiesButton and its parent class Panel.MenuButton would
attempt to connect their own _onEvent() function to Clutter::event,
which counterintuitively was connecting the child class' _onEvent()
function twice.
So, actually chain up on the signal handler, and don't connect twice
to the signal. Both methods were calling this.menu.close(), so only
do that on the parent class handler, since we're chaining up and doing
the right thing now.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733840
We don't need to wait to until the stage window is mapped to take
the modal grab, because that code now runs in a startup-prepared
signal handler, which in turn runs some time after the mainloop
has started and well after the stage window is mapped.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=711682
The grab would previously just consume the button release, while propagating
motion events, possibly down to clients in wayland. This would produce
inconsistent streams there.
On pointer events, the inconsistency would just be having clients receiving
events with the button 1 set in the mask, with no implicit grab. When touch
events are handled, this would be more hindering as the client would receive
touch_motion events with no prior touch_down nor later touch_up, something
never supposed to happen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
The animation is the same for modal dialogs, but it is now
run for non modal dialogs too (matching the new behavior on
show).
In addition, we run a destroy animation for normal windows,
if they use CSD (there are technical limitations that prevent
running animations after destroy on server decorated windows)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732857
Handle touch events, so that an interacted button locks to a single sequence,
but multiple sequences are free to interact with multiple key buttons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
The long press code has been refactored so it can be used on both pointer and
touch events, and the click gesture has been made to account for button=0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
No sequence checks are done, these UI elements promptly trigger a grab that
will cancel ongoing touches and redirect later ones somewhere else, so that
works as a barrier to multi-toggling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
