As planned and prepared with the last commits, let ClutterStage take
care of tracking input devices and their respective actors. This means
we now can remove the old infrastructure for this from
ClutterInputDevice.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1633>
Instead of going through the event queue, stage handling code, and
back to the input device via a vmethod call, do this directly in the
MetaSeatImpl. This is not too different from X11, where everything
happens inside the backend.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1403>
This is a bit scattered around, with the setter/getter in Clutter, and
it only being only directly honored in Wayland (it goes straight through
device properties in X11).
Make this private native API, and out of public ClutterInputDevice API.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1486
Just because X11/XI uses a particular terminology doesn't mean we
have to use the same terms in our own API. The replacement terms
are in line with gtk@1c856a208, which seems a better precedent
for consistency.
Follow-up to commit 17417a82a5.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1425
Make the clutter_input_device_get_actor() API public and remove
clutter_input_device_get_pointer_actor() in favour of the new function.
This allows also getting the "pointer" actor for a given touch sequence,
not only for real pointer input devices like mice.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1275
clutter_input_device_get_physical_size was just used for device mapping
heuristics in MetaInputMapper. It now started using the info from udev
on for both backends, so this means this clutter API is no longer
necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/514
This function call only applies to tablets, and thus will error
out unless it's called with CLUTTER_TABLET_DEVICEs. This will
allow setting absolute/relative mapping on those on the fly, as
this is optional.
This will only be practical for pads (and maybe generic buttonsets in
the future?), we just need to know the number as the events will also
contain a number as the identificator.
