We'll want to expose popup logic outside of meta-wayland-pointer.c and
one day we'll also probably want to add touch support for popups, so
lets move it to its own file. There are no significant semantical
changes, only refactoring.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744452
The commit 97a69cee5a broke the caching of
the surface state when because the frame_callback_list target state was
overwritten after the content had been moved to it.
This commit fixes it by moving the frame list addition after the copy. We
also need to initialize the list since the plain copy put garbage in it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743678
The input region currently only gets scaled by the surface
scale while ignoring the output scale, which causes input events to not get
delivered correctly for clients on hidpi screens. So take the output scale
into account when doing so.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739161
This commit is wrong, it assumes that the scale only applies to the one
set by the client but its not. meta_surface_actor_wayland_scale_texture
also handles the output scale. Revert the commit to fix hidpi for wayland
clients like weston-terminal.
This reverts commit 0364ea9140.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739161
It only contained a pointer to a wl_resource, which isn't much of
value. Just replace it with the wl_resource instead. Any future private
data should be handled by our future role system.
A wl_surface may have a wl_subsurface interface, but no buffers attached
yet, even though the geometry calculation code for surfaces/subsurfaces
assumes everything has already a buffer.
Just skip subsurfaces that don't have a buffer, those can't be set
a geometry yet, and right now it's crashing accessing the texture from
the NULL surface->buffer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735452
This makes it so that MetaSurfaceActorWayland is effectively just a
wrapper actor around MetaShapedTexture with some extra scaling. I think
the MetaSurfaceActor subclassing was a bad idea -- we really should have
these abstractions in much higher levels in the stack than the
compositor.
It doesn't make sense to update it in the surface actor. It's also
theoretically wrong to update the buffer's texture on surface commit,
too, because it's buffer state, not surface state, but I don't think
there's any place we use a wl_buffer without a wl_surface.
MetaGrabOp is painful and tedious to work with, because it's a
sequential series of values, meaning we have to use a giant unreadable
switch statement to figure out some basic things about the value.
To solve this, modify the encoding for MetaGrabOp and for the specific
window grab operations so that they're a set of bitflags that we can
easily check.
We assume in meta_window_wayland_move_resize that the next commit that
changes the geometry will always be for our next pending operation, so
if we have a move pending on a resize, the next commit will trigger the
move. This is, of course, fundamentally wrong.
We broke this assumption even more now that we don't fizzle out calls to
meta_window_move_resize_internal and now call it on every commit, which
means that a simple damage and then commit would complete a pending
move.
This was even broken by apps like weston-terminal, which, when clicking
on the maximize button, first redraws the terminal with the maximize
button state back on hover on press, and would only redraw when it got
the configure event with the coordinates.
To track the correct commit to apply the move for, we implement the
ack_configure request and ignore all move/resizes that happen before
that.
Right now, we actually fizzle out the entire move/resize if there's a
future pending configure we're waiting on.
The grabbing state is now checked for both pointer/touch devices
within the seat, and the grab start coordinates returned by
meta_wayland_seat_get_grab_info().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733631
This doesn't match what Weston does. I don't know of any apps that this
fixes (we don't have any apps that even use non-zero dx/dy, I don't
think), but this is part of a cleanup for window geometry.
