Ugh. So in the fullscreen case, we need to make sure to specify that
it's a MOVE_ACTION so that we move to the saved position, but we
can't do that in the resizing case since we need to use the resized
rectangle.
The flags are really hurting us here. Perhaps we should make it the
client's responsibility to specify a complete rectangle which we
could resize to; then the weird-o logic would be self-contained in
each front-end.
I'm not convinced this covers all cases, especially when we could have
a dangling weird state pointer, but it fixes our existing two testcases.
For gravity-based resizing, we need to make sure that the requested
rectangle has the proper x/y position given by the gravity resize,
rather than the bogus root_x_nw / root_y_nw parameter.
Make the test for this more explicit.
Restoring the position in our move_resize_internal implementation
is too late. We need to do it at ack-time, before we hand off the
new position to the constraints code.
With our surface_mapped strategy, implement_showing might not
change whether the window has been shown or not, and thus we
might end up clearing pending_compositor_effect before the window
is mapped.
Only clear pending_compositor_effect when the effect has actually
been used.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
Make sure to only use it for when we send out a configure notify. We
should use the passed in rectangle for other scenarios, like a
client-initiated resize.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
