Verify that the suggested monitor configuration contains only adjacent monitors,
and that if this is not the case we fallback to the linear configuration.
This can happen in case of multi-DPI setup, so add a test checking this too.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
It could happen that monitors suggest to use coordinates that don't take
in consideration the scaling applied to one monitor, and such the
generated configuration is not valid because not all the monitors are
adjacent.
So enforce this check before accepting a suggested configuration as it
is.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
We may need to check if rectangles region has adjacent neighbors and
so if there are no gaps in between monitors.
This can be done by checking if each monitor is adjacent to any other in
the same region.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/522>
This code sneaked unconditionally, even though we can disable
tracing code with -Dprofiler=false. Add some COGL_HAS_TRACING
checks so that this code is also optionally built.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1951>
This code sneaked unconditionally, even though we can disable
tracing code with -Dprofiler=false. Add some COGL_HAS_TRACING
checks so that this code is also optionally built.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1951>
This code sneaked unconditionally, even though we can disable
tracing code with -Dprofiler=false. Add some COGL_HAS_TRACING
checks so that this code is also optionally built.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1951>
Will be used to trace a lot more, and with more details, and thus may
have a larger impact on what is actually measured. This potential impact
is the reason for enabling only when needed.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1700>
A trace "anchor" is a trace head (CoglTraceHead) that is placed in a
certain scope (e.g. function scope), but then only triggered in another
scope, e.g. a condition.
This makes it possible to have optional trace instrumentation, that is
enabled only given e.g. a debug flag.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1700>
The failure to allocate was not properly handled, causing crashes later
on due to the offscreen being NULL.
#0 cogl_gl_framebuffer_bind (target=36160, gl_framebuffer=0x0)
#1 _cogl_driver_gl_flush_framebuffer_state (...)
#2 cogl_context_flush_framebuffer_state (read_buffer=0x55f48f386780, draw_buffer=0x55f48f386780, ...)
#3 cogl_framebuffer_clear4f (framebuffer=0x55f48f386780, ...)
#4 clutter_layer_node_pre_draw (...)
#5 clutter_paint_node_paint (...)
...
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1942>
When a selection owner advertises a mime type, but does not provide the
content upon a request for the mime type content, the requesting side
might wait indefinitely on the content.
To avoid this situation, add a timeout source, which will cancel the
selection transfer request after a certain timeout (15 seconds) passed.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1874>
Currently, if g-r-d closes the read end of the pipe for a
SelectionRead() operation, due to realizing that the application, that
should provide the mime type content, does not provide any content,
mutter won't notice that and still assumes that the read() operation
on the pipe in g-r-d is still happening, as mutter never writes to the
pipe in that situation and therefore cannot realize that the pipe is
already closed.
The effect of this is, that if g-r-d aborts a read() operation and
requests a new read() operation via SelectionRead(), mutter will deny
the request since it assumes that the previous read() operation is
still ongoing.
Fix this behaviour by also checking the pipe fd in mutter before
denying a SelectionRead() request.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-remote-desktop/-/issues/60
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1874>
With some resolutions (such as 4096x2160) we may compute duplicated
scale factors because we used a too wide threshold to check for an
applicable value.
In fact, while when we're at the first and last values it's fine to
search applicable values up to SCALE_FACTORS_STEP, on intermediate ones
we should stop in the middle of it, or we're end up overlapping the
previous scaling value domain.
In the said example in fact we were returning 2.666667 both when
looking to a scaling value close to 2.75 and 3.00 as the upper bound of
2.75 (3.0) was overlapping with the lower bound of 3.0 (2.75).
With the current code, the lower and upper bounds will be instead 2.875.
Adapt test to this, and this allows to also ensure that we're always
returning a sorted and unique list of scales (which is useful as also
g-c-c can ensure that this is true).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
We introduced META_MONITOR_SCALES_CONSTRAINT_NO_FRAC to get global scale
values however, this didn't work properly for some resolutions.
In fact it may happen that for some resolutions (such as 3200x1800) that
we did not compute some odd scaling levels (such as 3.0) but instead
its closest fractional value that allowed to get an integer resolution
(2.98507452 in this case).
Now this is something relevant when using fractional scaling because we
want to ensure that the returned value, when multiplied to the scaled
sizes, will produce an integer resolution, but it's not in global scale
mode where we don't use a scaled framebuffer.
So, take a short path when using no fractional mode and just return all
the applicable values without waste iterations on fractional values.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
Scaling values computation code served us well in the past years but
it's quite delicate and it has some issues in edge cases, so add a test
that verifies that the computed scaling values for all the most common
resolutions (and some that may be common in future) are what we expect
to be.
This may also serve us in future when we'd define a better algorithm to
compute the preferred scale, but this not the day.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
When deriving the global scale from current monitor, we were just checking the
supported value by the primary monitor, without considering weather the current
scale was supported by other monitors.
Resolve this by checking if the picked global scale is valid for all active
monitors, and if it's not the case, use a fallback strategy by just picking the
maximum scale level supported by every head.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/407
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/336>
In Xrandr we were caching the available scaling modes that were computed just
for the current mode, for each monitor, while we can actually reuse the
default implementation, by just passing the proper scaling constraint.
In monitor we need then to properly filter these values, by only accepting
integer scaling factors that would allow to have a minimal logical monitor
size.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/407
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/336>
