When using the new ActorAlign flags we must get the real alignment for
the horizontal axis, as clutter_actor_allocate() will compute the
effective alignment by itself; if we use the effective alignment then
ClutterActor.allocate() will swap it, and undo our work.
When using the old BinAlignment flags we should reverse the alignment
depending on whether the text direction of the child is RTL or LTR.
See bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684214
If the actor has a fixed position set, but it's not using the BinLayout
alignment enumeration to set its alignment, then we force the alignment
factor to 0.0; this is consistent with what happens with an explicit
alignment of CLUTTER_BIN_ALIGNMENT_FIXED.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682265
Instead of only relying on the (now) deprecated BinAlignment.FIXED
enumeration value, we just ask the actor if a fixed position has been
explicitly set, under the assumption that if a developer decided to call
set_x(), set_y(), or set_position() on an actor inside a BinLayout then
she wanted the fixed position to be honoured.
This removes the last (proper) use of the BinAlignment enumeration.
This reverts commit 03ec016faa.
ClutterLayoutManager implementations should just defer the easing state
set up to the child, and not try to impose a global one.
The example code that is meant to be XIncluded into the API reference
should not be part of the interactive test suite: it's code that it is
meant to be used as a reference implementation - whereas the interactive
test suite should be allowed to be lean and test behaviour even in nasty
ways. In short: the test suite should not be the place where we show off
idiomatic code for educational purposes.
This will make things interesting.
We have better replacements in ClutterActor, that do The Right Thing™
instead of deferring control and requiring reimplementation in every
single container actor.
Instead of getting the list of children to iterate over it, let's use
the newly added child iteration API; this should save us a bunch of
allocations, as well as indirections.
Ported: ClutterBinLayout and ClutterBoxLayout.
If an actor using a LayoutManager has attributes like margin or padding
then it'll have to shave them from the available allocation before
passing it to the LayoutManager::allocate() implementation. Layout
managers should, thus, not assume that the origin of the allocation is
in (0, 0), but take into account that the passed ActorBox might have a
different origin.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=649631
The descriptions for the 'y-align' and 'x-align' properties talk about a
layer and a layer manager. It seems that these properties are the
alignement factors relative to the BinLayout, so document them
accordingly.
* wip/table-layout:
Add ClutterTableLayout, a layout showing children in rows and columns
box-layout: Use allocate_align_fill()
bin-layout: Migrate to allocate_align_fill()
actor: Add allocate_align_fill()
test-flow-layout: Use BindConstraints
This adds a wrapper macro to clutter-private that will use
g_object_notify_by_pspec if it's compiled against a version of GLib
that is sufficiently new. Otherwise it will notify by the property
name as before by extracting the name from the pspec. The objects can
then store a static array of GParamSpecs and notify using those as
suggested in the documentation for g_object_notify_by_pspec.
Note that the name of the variable used for storing the array of
GParamSpecs is obj_props instead of properties as used in the
documentation because some places in Clutter uses 'properties' as the
name of a local variable.
Mose of the classes in Clutter have been converted using the script in
the bug report. Some classes have not been modified even though the
script picked them up as described here:
json-generator:
We probably don't want to modify the internal copy of JSON
behaviour-depth:
rectangle:
score:
stage-manager:
These aren't using the separate GParamSpec* variable style.
blur-effect:
win32/device-manager:
Don't actually define any properties even though it has the enum.
box-layout:
flow-layout:
Have some per-child properties that don't work automatically with
the script.
clutter-model:
The script gets confused with ClutterModelIter
stage:
Script gets confused because PROP_USER_RESIZE doesn't match
"user-resizable"
test-layout:
Don't really want to modify the tests
http://bugzilla.clutter-project.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2150
Store a back pointer of the layout manager inside the container using
the GObject instance data. This introduces a change in the implementation
of ClutterLayoutManager, though it's still binary compatible.
Casting a float to int to truncate it before assigning the value
to a float again is wrong. We should use ceilf() instead which
does what we want to achieve (rounding up the size to avoid
sub-pixel positioning of children).
The BinLayout should store a pointer to the Container that it is
using it as the layout manager.
This allows us to fix the API and drop the additional Container
arguments from set_alignment() and get_alignment().
This also allows us to add a ClutterBinLayout::add() method which
adds an actor and sets the alignment policies without dealing with
variadic arguments functions and GValue (de)marshalling.
Instead of overloading ClutterChildMeta with both container and layout
metadata and delegate to every LayoutManager implementation to keep a
backpointer to the layout manager instance, we can simply subclass
ChildMeta into LayoutMeta and presto! everything works out pretty well
for everyone.
Each actor managed by a BinLayout policy should reside inside its
own "layer", with horizontal and vertical alignment. The :x-align
and :y-align properties of the BinLayout are the default alignment
policies, which are copied to each new "layer" when it is created.
The set_alignment() and get_alignment() methods of BinLayout can
be changed to operate on a specific "layer".
The whole machinery uses the new ChildMeta support inside the
LayoutManager base abstract class.
Emit the ::layout-changed when the BinLayout alignment policies change.
This will result in a queue_relayout() on the containers using the
BinLayout layout manager.
A BinLayout is a simple layout manager that allocates a single cell,
providing alignment on both the horizontal and vertical axis.
If the container associated to the BinLayout has more than one child,
the preferred size returned by the layout manager will be as big as
the maximum of the children preferred sizes; the allocation will be
applied to all children - but it will still depend on each child
preferred size and the BinLayout horizontal and vertical alignment
properties.
The supported alignment properties are:
* center: align the child by centering it
* start: align the child at the top or left border of the layout
* end: align the child at the bottom or right border of the layout
* fill: expand the child to fill the size of the layout
* fixed: let the child position itself
