These match their alpha counterparts, apart from not setting the
alpha bit. This allows our internal mashinery to more easily
distinguish whether we need a slow alpha-pass during rendering or not.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1810>
These match their alpha counterparts, apart from not setting the
alpha bit. This allows our internal mashinery to more easily
distinguish whether we need a slow alpha-pass during rendering or not.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1810>
It works correctly with scanouts, in contrast to
clutter_stage_capture_into. Inspired by
meta_screen_cast_area_stream_src_record_to_buffer.
maybe_paint_cursor_sprite is now unused and thus removed.
v2:
* clutter_stage_paint_to_buffer requires switching to recording from an
idle callback as well. (Jonas Ådahl)
v3:
* Set human readable name for idle source. (Ivan Molodetskikh)
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1940
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1914>
The way wl_seat capabilities work, by notifying clients of capabilities
changes, and clients consequently requesting the relevant interface
objects (pointer, keyboard, touch) is inherently racy.
On quick VT changes for example, capabilities on the seat will be added
and removed, and by the time the client receives the capability change
notification and requests the relevant keyboard, pointer or touch,
another VT switch might have occurred and the wl_pointer, wl_keyboard or
wl_touch already destroyed, leading to a protocol error which kills the
client.
To avoid this, create the objects when requested regardless of the
capabilities.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1797
Related: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790932
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/77>
So far, releases are done locally by invoking `meson dist`.
We can do better and leverage the existing CI infrastructure, to get
to the following release workflow:
- bump version in meson.build, update NEWS etc.
- open merge request for the release
- merge when the pipeline (including dist check) succeeds
- tag the release
- wait for the tag pipeline to spit out the tarball artifact
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1980>
I don't think this ever happened to me, but it can't hurt enforcing
that every release has a corresponding NEWS entry.
(The script has been copied from Polari, thus the metainfo support)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1980>
Analogous to `get_image()` this returns a `ClutterContent` for a
given `MetaWindowActor`. This can be used to implement window
effects without a roundtrip from GPU to CPU memory.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1893>
In X11 when we switch to another tty all the the signals are blocked (as
the display fd is not replying back to polling, causing the main loop to
stop), and they are all handled once we switch back to the tty.
This is not a problem for most of external events, but in case of
accelerometer changes, once we reactivate a mutter session we'll get
them all together, causing lots of monitor reconfigurations leading to
black screen for some seconds and most of the times to a wrong
configuration being applied.
To avoid this, batch all these events using an idle to only apply the
last one we got in a loop.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1217
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
Create a test system bus and use it to run all the tests, add a mock
SensorsProxy (via dbusmock template) server that implements the
net.hadess.SensorProxy interface.
To make testing easier, the service is created on request of a proxy for
it, whose lifetime controls the mock service lifetime as well.
This is done using a further mock service that is used to manage the
others, using python-dbusmock to simplify the handling.
Add basic tests for the orientation manager.
As per the usage dbusmock, we're now launching all the tests under such
wrapper, so that local dbus environment won't ever considered, and
there's no risk that it may affect the tests results both locally and in
CI.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
When creating the configuration for the builtin monitor we try to get
the panel configuration for the builtin panel, but we don't proceed if
that monitor is currently inactive.
This is fine when adjusting an active configuration to the current
device rotation, but it isn't correct when we want to create a new
configuration based on another where the monitor is configured but not
yet enabled.
So, only find the panel configuration without looking the current state
but ensuring that the passed configuration will enable it.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
When we get an orientation event we don't care about keeping track of the
configuration changes, but actually we can consider the new configuration
just a variant of the previous one, adapted to floating device hardware
events, so we only want to apply it if possible, but we don't want to keep
a record of it for reverting capabilities.
Doing that would in fact, break the ability of reverting back to an actual
temporary or persistent configuration.
For example when device orientation events happen while we're waiting for
an user resolution change confirmation, we would save our new rotated
configuration in the history, making then impossible to revert back to
the original persistent one.
So in such case, don't keep track of those configurations in the history,
but only keep track of the last one as current, checking whether the
new current is child or sibling of the previously one.
Fixes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1221
Related to: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/646
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
When creating a configuration taking orientation into account we're using
the sensors orientation even if this is currently not used (for example
when an accelerator is available, but there's no touch screen).
This would cause to have a different behavior when configuration is
created and when we're loading a known configuration on startup.
So always honor whether the monitor's orientation is managed or not.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1233>
