If we get another effect on the same actor, we should make sure to
remove the clone through the "overwrite" methods provided by Tweener, or
there will be a race that might end up with a stray clone being left
around.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756714
The translation should describe the difference between the fullscreened
and unfullscreened position of the window - however we are currently
assuming a fullscreen position of (0, 0) instead of the monitor's origin,
which causes glitches on dualscreen setups.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=756697
We use the newly introduced feature from Mutter to hook up our own
fullscreen and unfullscreen animations.
To give the illusion of a transition as smooth as possible, we create a
snapshot of the current contents of the actor before its state is
changed, and crossfade between the two states while the size changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707248
Follow the design we have in gtk+ for buttons dialogs,
which are at the bottom and they expand full width, having
the same amount of space for each one.
Also, since this removes any space for non-button widgets
in the button area, move the spinner present in the auth prompt
dialog next to the password entry.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746108
This object (not really a Clutter.GestureAction) sets up a captured-event
handler, which exclusively looks for 4 finger touchpad swipes, emitting
an ::activated signal under the same terms than WorkspaceSwitchAction.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752250
shell_global_get_overrides_settings() may return %NULL in case of
custom shell modes (i.e. not the default and classic ones); while
this is not officially encouraged, we should still handle it rather
than throw an error.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=751921
Just reuse this gesture rather than implementing edge detection ourselves.
As a plus, we might get touchpad swipe support when Clutter handles it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749742
Pause dynamic workspace management while workspaceSwitcherPopup
is shown so as to eliminate infinite creation and destruction of
workspaces, thus preventing stuttering while trying to move a
window to last workspace.
Add _isWorkspacePrepended flag to make sure only a single workspace
is prepended at a time thus preventing the possibility of prepending
infinite workspaces while dynamic workspace management is on pause.
Prepend a new workspace by creating a new workspace instead of only
shifting the windows to next workspace so that the workspaceSwitcherPopup
may appear in sync with what's happening behind the scene and display
correct number of workspaces.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712778
"Moving" a window to another workspace doesn't make sense when it cannot
be unstuck, and is potentially confusing if a new workspace is added at
the start/end - just don't do anything in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746782
Users currently can't switch VTs while at the login screen.
This commit fixes that, by adding the relevant keybindings
to the login screen's allowed keybindings list.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744800
The code described by the comment was moved away in commit eda27d51,
so it is not misleading at best. It wasn't too useful to begin with,
so kill it off rather than moving it to the correct place ...
When using dynamic workspaces, a new workspace will be appended
when moving a window down to the last (empty) workspace. It makes
sense to extend the behavior in the opposite direction, and prepend
a new workspace when moving a window up from the first workspace.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665764
New workspaces are inserted by shifting all windows on workspaces
below the insertion position down. As a result, when the new
workspace is inserted before the active one, we end up with
the illusion of a workspace switch. Instead, activate the workspace
on which the windows from the active one ended up.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665764
We are not supposed to mess around with OR windows, so don't try
to shift them to a different workspace. This fixes a warning with
newer versions of mutter.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665764
We will soon allow to insert a new workspace by other means than
DND in between workspace thumbnails, so move the relevant code
to a new windowManager method.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665764
So that we'll recreate it the next time we want to show it. Otherwise,
we'll try to call things on a half-destroyed ResizePopup and end up
causing errors instead of showing the user their resize popup.
When animating workspace switches, windows on the old and new workspaces
are temporarily reparented. If windows are restacked, those windows will
thus be ignored by mutter until meta_switch_workspace_completed() resyncs
the stacking at the end of the animation.
As a result, activating a window on another workspace that is not on top
of the stack is very noticeably a two-step operation of switching workspace
and raising the window. There is a technical reason for that order[0], but
we can avoid the visible disruption by manually syncing the stack during
the switch operation.
[0] https://git.gnome.org/browse/mutter/tree/src/core/workspace.c#n590https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=741680
Just like keybindings and the message tray pointer barrier, gestures
don't always make sense - for instance, swiping up the screen shield
should not trigger the message tray just as the SelectArea action around
the left edge should not open the overview.
To avoid this, restrict gestures based on the current keybinding mode.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740237
Now that mutter gives a way to check if a MetaKeyBinding was marked as
'reversed' or not, gnome-shell does not have to hardcode that a
MetaKeyBinding using a shift modifier is reversed, it can directly check
if the appropriate flag is set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732296
The animation is the same for modal dialogs, but it is now
run for non modal dialogs too (matching the new behavior on
show).
In addition, we run a destroy animation for normal windows,
if they use CSD (there are technical limitations that prevent
running animations after destroy on server decorated windows)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732857
Commit 6c2f3d1d17 moved pref overrides into JS to implement
session mode specific overrides in a clean and generic way.
However that approach comes with a cost - doing the overrides only
after having handled over control to JS means that the core will
be initialized with the non-overridden settings before changing
to the correct values. In the best case this is unnecessary work,
but it can in fact have a worse effect: when initializing workspaces,
we will restore the previous number of workspaces when using
dynamic-workspaces and reset to the configured number otherwise.
As the non-overridden default for dynamic-workspaces is FALSE, we
can easily end up moving the user's windows to the "wrong" workspace.
Now GSettings is expected to grow support for session specific defaults,
which will render our entire override system obsolete (yay!). Given
that, it seems acceptable to use a less generic (and uglier) approach
in the meanwhile, in order to fix aforementioned problems. So move
overrides back before core initialization and just hardcode the
session-mode => override-schema relation.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=695487
Having the full geometry of the menu's source button (if any) will
allow us to address several misbehaviors of window menus, so use
that instead of show_menu().
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731058
We now allow "appmenu" in the button layout to make synchronizing it
with GTK+'s client-side decorations easier, but as some people tweak
their settings to get in-window app menus even when using the shell,
actually pop up the app menu when the button is activated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730752
