Shell modal dialogs can take their action on a certain key's
key-release-event. For example on <enter> the affirmative action is
usually run.
Make sure that the key was also pressed on the dialog and we're not
seeing a spurious key-release-event from a key that was pressed before
the dialog was displayed. Rebased original patch for master by Stef
Walter to version 3.6.3.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692937
The screenshield was not checking the return value of pushModal(), meaning
that it believed it was fully locked when it was not. Later, calling
popModal() would fail, causing an exception and blocking the unlock.
Now we do nothing for user initiated actions, and fail with an explanatory
message at idle time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689106
Hiding notificationWidget with a telepathy notification causes
unfocused to be emitted, which causes a reentrant updateState.
If another notification is queued, it is shown before the old
one is cleared.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683986
MessageTray._tween sets the state variable to the in-progress value,
so it must be sure that at the end of the animation the value will
be the corresponding final and nothing else will happen in between.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683986
MessageTray tweens both opacity and y to hide or show _notificationWidget,
but only y when expanding it. This means that an existing tween to hide
the notification will continue running, clearing the notification state.
If the hiding one completes before the showing one, the onComplete handler
will throw an exception (because the notification was nullified) and
therefore break the state tracking.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683986
org.gnome.desktop.screensaver.lock-delay contains the grace period
of the screensaver: if deactivated within that many seconds from the
start of the idle period, the shell should not prompt for a password.
This setting correspond to the "Lock screen after" combo in screen
and privacy panels.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690766
Pressing esc while the mouse is down should not make the curtain fall,
otherwise a gray screen results.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686800
Conflicts:
js/ui/screenShield.js
js/ui/unlockDialog.js
Due to an oversight, the width of the password entry is currently
determined by the length of the message description. Fix the flags
so that the entry spans the entire width of the dialog.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684810
When updating the dash, we already avoid all animations while the
overview is hidden. However, as we are using Main.queueDeferredWork(),
updates may be deferred up to ~20 seconds while the overview is hidden.
If the overview is entered before a queued update has taken place, it
will be run immediately on map - as the overview is visible by then,
this means animating any outstanding changes.
Work around this by skipping animations during overview transitions as
well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686530
When the summary notification is open when the tray is closed, we end
up with two concurrent animations: the notification fading out, and the
tray moving away from underneath it. Sliding out the tray should be the
primary transition here, so hide the notification immediately to not
draw the user's attention away from it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686888
Having the close button move away from under the pointer after
clicking it is confusing and distracts from the main transition,
which is hiding the notification. Just hide it immediately.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682237
Rather than destroying the entire source, which is unintuitive, simply
close the notification. Removing the entire source is still possible
by right-clicking on the summary item and choosing "Remove".
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682237
If the session mode has no locking support, screenshield had code to
unlock automatically, but it did so by checking the return value of
the constructor, instead of checking if the constructor was actually
callable, so it would get a TypeError before reaching the check.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687708
If we lock before the user becomes active again, gnome-session will never
change presence from IDLE, and thus we'll never hide the lightbox.
Instead, install our own idle monitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687020
When the user has the entered the password for the second time
and clicked OK, clear messages from the previous attempt, so any
new failure is shown clearly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687132
After some changes, the tooltip label at the dash is not available
until it is visually shown. As this is not anymore a reliable
source of accessible name, we just set the accessible name
with the string used on that label.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686583
Instead of keeping track of the old adjustment.upper keep track of the
old adjustment.value that corresponded to the bottom scroll position.
This fixes the integrated chatview not always scrolling to the bottom
by removing the assumption that page_size is constant between updates,
which is not the case as the view is presented in various different ways.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686571
I've heard quite a bit of feedback from people who want to log out,
even if they are the sole user on their system. It doesn't seem worth
alienating them over this; so add a setting to make the 'Log out' item
always show up.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686057
Rationale:
- Getting something out of the way should be quick;
- Very few things in the real world move linearly so, linear
animations, especially for something as big and visible as this,
felt too artificial;
- Moving the curtain out should start slower to make it feel like
having weight (it fills the whole screen after all) but quickly
accelerate towards the end to make it snappy too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686745
Currently close() is a no-op when the menu has already been closed.
However, repeated calls could pass different animation parameters.
For instance in the user menu, we try to hide the menu immediately
before locking the screen, to avoid the popup jumping across the
screen while fading out - as we do this from the corresponding
item's activate handler, the closing is still animated if the menu's
own handler (which requests a full animation) is run first.
Fix this by changing close() to overwrite ongoing animations before
bailing out early.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686484
Ouch. This went unnoticed for a long time as by default (using
dynamic workspaces) only one workspace is added at a time, which
happens to work fine.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686487
The same logic as for commit 1f30670c1d applies to the case
where we lock the screen before suspending - we don't want the
menu to jump to the opposite screen side to fade out, so remove
the animation altogether.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686484
Currently the label for the show-apps button is only updated during
drag operations, so after an item is successfully dropped on the
button, the label will still read "Remove from Favorites".
Fix this by resetting the label on drag-end.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684627
If esc is pressed twice in succession in the unlock dialog, the curtain
is cancelled, but the dialog is cleared after the first esc cancels it,
and it's not destroyed and recreated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=685441
The interface was declared to take an unsigned integer instead
of a boolean, as gnome-screensaver does. Due to this,
gnome-screensaver-command --activate or --deactivate does not
work when used with gnome-shell.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686063
The configured calendar application might not actually be installed.
Instead of failing with an error message, hide the menu item altogether
in this case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=686050
Since panel corners are currently square, this doesn't really affect much,
but it's very clear what the code was supposed to be. At the same time,
also fix up a redeclaration with 'let', which technically isnt' kosher.
