Due to the way the IBus API works we might get property changes while
the menu is already open. In that case the separator visibility logic
doesn't work since it only applies on menu open/close. This works
around that issue.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682314
IBus has a properties API which are basically generic knobs into the
engine which are serialized and presented in a way that allows us to
easily build actionable UI elements with them.
Instead of implementing the whole generic system and accepting
everything coming out of the engines, for now, this patch just adds
support for a couple of important IBus Anthy properties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682314
The screenshield requires gdm 3.5, which can be problematic in
jhbuild configurations, or distributions that don't use GDM as the display
manager. Allow transparent fallback to gnome-screensaver in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060
When the tray is triggered by keybinding rather than dwelling, the
first summary item should be given key focus. Currently this is
achieved by grabbing the focus before toggling the tray, so that
the grabHelper will move the focus for us. However this interferes
with the grabHelper's focus save/restore mechanism - for instance,
after using the keybinding once, the tray will always come up with
the first item focused.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently it is only possible to use keynav inside the tray if it
has been triggered with the keyboard shortcut. Make it possible to
initiate keynav by hitting Tab in other cases as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently opening the summary boxpointer acts as a stop gap for
keynav - the only shortcut still working is "Escape" to hide the
tray altogether.
Change the handling of Escape to only close the summary boxpointer
and allow to use the down arrow as alternative (unless the boxpointer
already processes the key press itself of course, like the chat
entry does). Also add a Delete shortcut to dismiss the open summary
item.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently clicks outside the grabbed actors are handled the same as
the user pressing Escape - a single actor is popped from the grab stack.
However according to the design, outside clicks should release all grabs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
When using keynav in the top bar, menus may be opened using the
down arrow; in a similar fashion, allow to open the summary
boxpointer with the up arrow.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Currently the HistoryManager consumes all arrow up/down key presses
unconditionally. Change this to only consume the event if the entry
text was actually changed, e.g. not when trying to move past the
first/last item.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
'destroy' is emitted before the actor is unmapped during destruction, so
notify::mapped would emit an exception. Since unmapping is guaranteed,
the 'destroy' signal is unnecessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684154
The speed and quality properties have been removed in favor of properties
closer to the upstream library.
Removing the properies from the pipeline would result into a huge
slowdown so we have to map the old values to the new ones.
According to the source code of the old vp8enc element quality maps to
(int)(63 - quality * 6.2) for min_quantizer and max_quantizer, while
speed maps to cpu-used = speed == 0 ? 0 : (speed - 1).
So set min_quantizer and min_quantizer to 13, and cpu-used to 5 based on
the above formulas.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684206
Remove the PlacesManager, its search provider and all associated code.
Places search is now provided by nautilus using the external search
provider API.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683506
When Dan Winship wrote the GrabHelper code originally, it didn't
handle a grab stack. I wrote the grab stack code hastily when landed
the message tray, not understanding all of the code that was involved
here.
Fix it so that we properly do the operations for each type of grab
when we first need to, and not sometimes when the first grab is taken.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683546
_hideTray() is called by _updateState() when the tray is visible
but should be hidden; however, _updateState() may be called again
from within _hideTray() when releasing the GrabHelper grab, so
unless we update the _trayState variable before that, _hideTray()
will be called a second time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
Rather than unconditionally removing a focus root in remove_group(),
decrement a counter that add_group() increments, and only actually
remove a focus root when the counter drops to 0.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682243
A couple of people have walked up to me and asked how to get to the
unlock screen from the screen shield. This was partly addressed by
bug 682285, but all three people who asked me about this said they
tried the return key and were surprised when it didn't work.
It sort of makes sense, since the user is "enter"ing the computer or
"return"ing to it.
This commit makes enter work in addition to the existing escape key.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683889
Since we now use the capture phase to feed events into the input
method, we must set the capture flag for the event that starts
searches so that IMs can get at it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684040
If the user starts typing right away, assume that the entry is
for a password and don't clear it when the secret request actually
comes. Then, if the user completes typing, we also stash the answer
and send it to GDM right away on the first PAM prompt.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681576
The onUngrab callback already checks if all notifications are destroyed and
hides immediately if so. Previous code instead would leave state handling
in an inconsistent state, by not removing the grab, not setting
summaryBoxPointerState to HIDDEN and not disconnecting various signals.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=684036
