Since commit f60a469a34e, everything outside the fade area is painted
fully transparent. That is required for the fade effect during app
grid navigation, to prevent unfaded parts of surrounding pages
becoming visible on wide-screen displays.
However in most other cases, that behavior is the exact opposite
of what we want: Elements outside the fade area (like scroll bars)
should never fade.
In order to fix the regular case, hide the new behavior behind a
property.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/4234
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1831>
Instead of taking just vertical/horizontal offsets, take a ClutterMargin
to allow us set the fade offsets on each direction specifically. Also,
handle negative values in margins, the fade effect will run in the negative
space left by the scrollview padding instead. Another difference now is
that areas outside the extents of the effect will be transparent, instead
of the effect ending abruptly past the given extents.
This will be used by the app grid, in order to selectively let see either
of next/prev pages while navigating.
While at it, fix code style issues in st_scroll_view_update_fade_effect(),
and clean up unused variables from the GLSL code.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1630>
The shader code currently only accounts for padding for the
bottom and right fades, but not for top and left.
As a result, we only fade the right edge when swiping through app
picker pages, whoops.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1569>
Commit 4095a58eb9a2921c178b30c56d1fbe7662c2778a introduced a
regression, since we have to take into account four cases,
top, bottom, right, and left, and that can't be merged into
two like that commit did.
So fix it to make fade effect works again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708256
The vvalue and hvalue uniforms are only used to decide whether we
should do fade the edges or not based on the fade_edges uniform.
The result does not change accross fragments so there is no reason
to recompute it for every fragment (pixel) so just split the edge
fade into two uniforms and compute the "should we fade the edges"
boolean once for every direction (when setting the uniforms) instead
of for every single fragment twice.
This reduces the number of uniforms as well as the the number of instructions
which are limited on older hardware. It should also be more efficent.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708007
The changes from commit b4f5f1e4617434 and b394d184cc7fa6 increased the
instructions required for the fade fragment shader. This is over the limit
for some hardware (like intel gen3), which causes the driver to fallback
to software rendering for the shader. The result is that painting a scrollview
that has a fade effect takes around 30 (!!) seconds.
So lets go back to the old effect for 3.8 until we find a solution.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696404
Since commit b4f5f1e46174, the effect is eased in at the scroll
view's edges so that it does not appear out of nowhere. However,
the linear easing used is not the best option, as now the effect
appears so late that content near the edges ends up just being
cut off rather than faded out.
So adjust the easing function to have the effect appear faster.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694327
Before version 1.2 of GLSL it would not implicitly convert from int to
float which meant that if you compare a float variable with an integer
constant it will generate a compile error. In particular this means
that on GLES2 (which uses GLSL 1.0) the scroll view shader will not
compile on pedantic compilers, which includes Mesa. This patch just
changes it to use floating point constants.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693339
Cogl sets this for us since commit 2701b93f159bf2d3387cedf2d06fe921ad5641f3.
Setting it twice is illegal and causes compile failures:
error C0204: version directive must be first statement and may not be repeated.
This doesn't (or shouldn't) change the visual appearance of the fade
effect, but does do all the testing math inside the shader, rather
than on the CPU. This will make fading the offset much easier in
the future.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689249
GLSL 1.20 is a better language, and we'll rely on it in future updates.
This doesn't have any additional constraints, since GLSL 1.20 was
standardized before GLSL-supporting drivers came out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=689249
