The bind constraint that replaced the Shell.GenericContainer in commit
f4682748fa is subtly different from the previous code:
It forces the actor to have the same size as the stage, rather than just
requesting that size.
This breaks the magnifier which relies on the UI being able to be bigger
than the display size. Fix by going back to using a custom actor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/646
The texture cache now returns an actor with an appropriate ClutterContent
rather than a ClutterTexture. That actor uses the CONTENT_SIZE request
mode, which means that it will unconditionally request the preferred size
of the content. That is, setting an explicit size no longer has an effect.
Fix this by making sure the image is already loaded with the desired
dimensions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1024
It is convenient for the OSK so it eg. doesn't appear centered in the
available space (eg. on very narrow portrait layouts), plus it will also
be convenient to align other AspectContainers to the same baseline.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/439
While it is possible to register accelerators in-bulk, there is no
proper way to unregister them again. This adds the corresponding call
for UngrabAccelerator to allow ungrabbing multiple accelerators at the
same time.
The idea is that g-s-d can use this in the future to simplify the
keybinding reload logic.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/429
Commit 8f15193b4 changed the `policy` property from a regular JS property to
a getter. This was necessary to avoid calling an overridden _createPolicy()
method before a subclass is properly initialized, but it broke the second
way of using notification sources:
Don't create a Source subclass, but use the base class directly and change
its `policy` property.
There's no good reason why we should no longer allow this, so add a setter.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/431
The dialog doesn't change the `destroyOnClose` property from its default,
so it is already destroyed automatically on close. So if we also destroy
it explicitly, we end up (rightfully) with one of gjs' infamous "invalid
access" warnings.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/430
Ouch, this went unnoticed for a long time: As the minimum size of menu
items is generally small (because its label can be ellipsized), we are
requesting the unellipsized width of the last "size child" instead of
the widest one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/996
Here's a template string with '/' that escaped commit 94423151b2,
resulting in an xgettext warning when generating the .pot file.
Simply move it into the resource like the other interface descriptions
to make xgettext happy again.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/407
The top drag gesture is not of any use if the topmost window is not
a fullscreen window and will only block events near the important top
screen edge (i.e. the panel). To fix this, only enable this gesture if
the focus window is a fullscreen window.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/552
If the user's real name is too long to fit the menu comfortably, we are
supposed to use the username instead. However since commit f8e5e3e435,
we no longer set a max-width on the menu as a whole, but instead base
the width request on only "unellipsizable" children. For some reason
the system menu ended up there, so the name is now allowed to grow
indefinitely.
Remove it from the list of size children to get the intended behavior
back.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/400
The menu grabs the key focus when opened, which takes focus away from
whichever actor triggered the keyboard. And as the menu doesn't have
any text entries, the keyboard is popped down as a result.
Prevent this by making the menu items unfocusable, so the keyboard
focus just stays where it is. Considering that the menu is part
of the on-screen keyboard itself, not being keyboard-navigatable
isn't a big deal here.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/171
Menu items use a single 'active' state that follows both hover and
keyboard focus. It therefore makes sense for the active item to always
grab the focus, in particular as an item that is sensitive but not
focusable by keynav would be rather weird.
As it turns out, we do have a case that is weird enough where we want
exactly that, so only grab focus if the actor's :can-focus property
allows it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/171
Window titles aren't restricted in length, so the menu may end up unwieldily
width. Commit 0bec76b6ee therefore limited the app context menus, but that
got accidentally dropped in commit 0ded0dbfd5. Add back the limitation and
extend it to the new app menu as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/624
Top bar icons are supposed to by symbolic, but not all applications
provide a symbolic icon. Make the stick out less by desaturating
the appmenu icon if a symbolic style is requested.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/624
With the app menu being phased out entirely, there's no good reason to
keep support for the fallback app menu in decorations either - the number
of applications that set an app menu and haven't embraced client-side
decorations is extremely small, and they should already have alternative
fallbacks for non-GNOME environment in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/624
Since the plans to retire the app menu were announced, nobody objected to
the removal of the menu content, however some concerns were raised about
the menu's secondary role as indicator.
Account for that by not removing the existing app menu, but replacing it
with a built-in menu similar to the existing app icon context menu.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/624
The GtkSettings was originally introduced to inform applications about
the desktop shell's capabilities, but users soon started to use it to
force GTK+ to show the app menu inside the application. We eventually
caved and also handled the setting ourselves to hide the in-shell app
menu to allow users to "move" it.
But now the remote app menu is in the process of being retired[0], and
will be replaced with a simple indicator that cannot be moved, so
stop following the GtkSetting.
[0] https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/Initiatives/wikis/App-Menu-Retirementhttps://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/624
Certain keybindings should continue to work even when a popup
menu is on screen. For instance, the keybinding for showing
the app menu and the keyinding for showing the calendar are
examples.
This is achieved by putting in place a special "POPUP" action
mode, whenever a popup menu is active. This mode replaces
the (e.g., "NORMAL" or "OVERVIEW") action mode that was in place
for as long as the popup menu is active.
But those keybindings should not work when the user is at the
unlock dialog (which uses an action mode of "UNLOCK").
Unfortunately, since commit c79d24b6 they do.
This commit addresses the problem by forcing the action mode
to NONE at the unlock screen when popups are visible.
CVE-2019-3820
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/851
We shouldn't allow toggling menus that aren't supported by the
current session mode, but as indicators are hidden rather than
destroyed on mode switches, it is not enough to check for an
indicator's existence.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/851
This keyboard works similar to GTK+'s emoji chooser (actually, both pull
from the same JSON file). Emojis are categorized in sections and variants
and kept in a "model".
The EmojiPager actor then uses this model to generate pages on-the-fly as
the user swipes around. This is an important optimization since the amount
of actors would rival with the rest of the shell otherwise.
The EmojiSelection object puts the EmojiPager, the page indicators and
a KeyContainer with the bottom row of emoji section shortcuts together to
implement the emoji panel as a whole.
The Keyboard object hooked this to an "emoji" key, which is just visible
on the Clutter.InputContentPurpose where showing an emoji would be
meaningful. Otherwise the surrounding buttons are made a bit wider to
cover up for it (i.e. as it was before).
In order to cater for emoji panel usage, we want something like PageIndicators
except:
- It should have horizontal disposition
- It should not be animatable (?)
- It should not be reactive
Separated PageIndicators into a base, non-animated widget, and an
AnimatedPageIndicators that can be used on appDisplay.js. Reactiveness is
set through an extra method, and layout is set as a construct argument.
This will be useful as we want other panels (eg. emoji) to preserve aspect
ratio with the rest of the OSK. Separate the aspect ratio management logic
into this container that will be the parent of them all.
