Leave these checks up to the callers, the only uses of this function
(indirect, through meta_wayland_seat_get_grab_info) are
[wl_shell|xdg]_surface.move/resize/show_window_menu.
In move/resize it makes sense to check for a button being pressed, because
we must expect a button release event. However for xdg_surface.show_window_menu
we 1) don't strictly need further events and 2) we must account for press+release
event pairs being processed at once in the compositor before the client sees
the former.
That is eg. the case of touchpad 2nd/3rd button tap emulation, multifinger
taps will emit the event pair at once, so when the client manages to request
xdg_surface.show_window_menu, it'll be too late in the compositor side, so the
request is ignored.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764519
In order for the native cursor renderer to be able to create a hw
cursor in response to wl_pointer.set_cursor(), keep a private use-count
and reference to the active buffer, stopping it from being released
until it is consumed, replaced, or the surface is destroyed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762828
Each wl_surface.commit with a newly attached buffer should result in
one wl_buffer.release for the attached buffer. For example attaching
the same buffer to two different surfaces must always result in two
wl_buffer.release events being emitted by the server. The client is
responsible for counting the wl_buffer.release events and be sure to
have received as many release events as it has attached and committed
the buffer, before reusing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762828
On the X11 backend we don't track the pointer position in
priv->current_x/y which remain set to zero. That means we never set
the clutter stage cursor if point 0,0 isn't covered by any monitor
since we return early.
Commit 4bebc5e5fa introduced this to
avoid crashing on the prepare-at handlers when the cursor position
doesn't fall inside any monitor area but we can handle that higher up
in the stack. In that case, the sprite's scale doesn't matter since
the cursor won't be shown anyway so we can skip setting it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763159
We may have released the wl_buffer already when doing this, which means
we should not try to access the wl_buffer content.
Regarding the cursor texture this is not an issue since we can just use
the texture created in apply_pending_state().
The hw cursor however will only be realized if the surface is already
using the the buffer (surface->using_buffer == true). This will, at the
moment, effectively disable hardware cursors for SHM buffers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762828
The x/y coordinates of the ClutterInputDevice were not the ones which was
the result of this event but whatever event was queued the last. The
correct coordinates can, however, be found in the event itself, so lets
use those.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
The wp_pointer_constraints protocol is a protocol which enables clients
to manipulate the behavior of the pointer cursor associated with a seat.
Currently available constraints are locking the pointer to a static
position, and confining the pointer to a given region.
Currently locking is fully implemented, and confining is implemented for
rectangular confinement regions.
What else is lacking is less troublesome semantics for enabling the lock
or confinement; currently the only requirement implemented is that the
window that appears focused is the one that may aquire the lock.
This means that a pointer could be 'stolen' by creating a new window that
receives active focus, or when using focus-follows-mouse, a pointer
passes a window that has requested a lock. This semantics can be changed
and the protocol itself allows any semantics as seems fit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
Add support for sending relative pointer motion deltas to clients who
request such events by creating wp_relative_pointer objects via
wp_relative_pointer_manager.
This currently implements the unstable version 1 from wayland-protocols.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
As per the spec:
- wl_pointer.axis_source determines the current source of
scroll events.
- wl_pointer.axis_stop determines when there's no further
scroll events on the given axis.
- wl_pointer.axis_discrete is emitted on "wheel"
scroll sources, measured in ticks.
- wl_pointer.frame is meant to coalesce events that logically belong
together, e.g. axis events in this case.
Co-Authored-By: Peter Hutterer <peter.hutterer@who-t.net>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=760637
When running as a native compositor, we can just do that. However, the
previous code must stay for whenever it's run as a X11 client.
Additionally, the fallback switch{} that transforms clutter 1-indexed
buttons into input.h event codes had to be adapted to the change introduced
in clutter commit 83b738c0e, where the 4-7 button range is kept clear for
compatibility with the X11 backend.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758239
We don't have any way of knowing what the intended size of a XWayland
cursor is supposed to be, so lets do what we do with regular XWayland
surfaces and don't scale them. The result is that cursor sprites of
HiDPI aware X11 clients will show correctly, but non-aware clients may
have tiny cursor sprites.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=755099
This commits refactors cursor handling code and plugs in logic so that
cursor sprites changes appearance as it moves across the screen.
Renderers are adapted to handle the necessary functionality.
The logic for changing the cursor sprite appearance is done outside of
MetaCursorSprite, and actually where depends on what type of cursor it
is. In mutter we now have two types of cursors that may have their
appearance changed:
- Themed cursors (aka root cursors)
- wl_surface cursors
Themed cursors are created by MetaScreen and when created, when
applicable(*), it will extend the cursor via connecting to a signal
which is emitted everytime the cursor is moved. The signal handler will
calculate the expected scale given the monitor it is on and reload the
theme in a correct size when needed.
wl_surface cursors are created when a wl_surface is assigned the
"cursor" role, i.e. when a client calls wl_pointer.set_cursor. A
cursor role object is created which is connected to the cursor object
by the position signal, and will set a correct texture scale given what
monitor the cursor is on and what scale the wl_surface's active buffer
is in. It will also push new buffers to the same to the cursor object
when new ones are committed to the surface.
This commit also makes texture loading lazy, since the renderer doesn't
calculate a rectangle when the cursor position changes.
The native backend is refactored to be triple-buffered; see the comment
in meta-cursor-renderer-native.c for further explanations.
* when we are running as a Wayland compositor
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
Make a surface roles into objects with vfuncs for things where there
before was a big switch statement. The declaration and definition
boilerplate is hidden behind C macros.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744932
Use a better name, use GNOME conventions for error handling, open code the
client error reporting and send the error to the correct resource.
wl_subcompositor doesn't have a role error yet, so continue use some
other error. The only effect of this is error received in the client will
be a bit confusing, it will still be disconnected.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754215
meta_wayland_pointer_get_client_pointer() may be called when the
MetaWaylandPointer as been already shut down, so the hash table will be
NULL at that moment.
Instead of moving around all the bound pointer resources for a client
when changing focus, keep all the resources bound by a client in a per
client struct, and track the focus by having a pointer to the current
active pointer client struct instance.
This will simplify having wl_pointer extensinos sharing the pointer
focus of the wl_pointer by only having to add them to the pointer
client.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744104
Mutter generates a motion event for every button and scroll events,
which confuses Xwayland apps that rely on XMotionEvents for various
purposes, e.g. it fools rxvt jumpy mouse detection code.
Remove the call to notify_motion() from the button and scroll event
handlers to avoid these spurious motion events.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748705
If a client creates an xdg_popup given a parent that is a xdg_popup that
is not the most top one in the grab chain, send the
not_the_topmost_popup error.
Also fail a client who destroys a popup that is not the top most one.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744452
We'll want to expose popup logic outside of meta-wayland-pointer.c and
one day we'll also probably want to add touch support for popups, so
lets move it to its own file. There are no significant semantical
changes, only refactoring.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744452
Whenever the compositor takes a grab, we're supposed send leave/enter
events to the current surface, which makes sense, as the compositor
has stolen the pointer from the client.
I forget why I added the special case in the first place, but it's
likely a bug that's since been fixed.
This actually fixes a bug: it prevents the need to double-click on
X11 application titlebars when grabbing them.
This reverts commit 33acb5fea0.
The issue here is that the pointer actor does not actually get reset
when the actor's reactivity changes, so we end up with stale picks after
actors are destroyed.
I have a local patch to Clutter for this, but I don't have time to
submit it upstream, so let's just use the ugly code for now.
This reverts commit e496ed50d6.
This was incorrect. wl_surface_destructor actually does the full repick
-- doing it here is dangerous, because the destroy listeners actually
run *before* the destructor, not after, so the surface is still alive.
It only contained a pointer to a wl_resource, which isn't much of
value. Just replace it with the wl_resource instead. Any future private
data should be handled by our future role system.
