This is a terrible hack. We need to figure out a better way to do
interactive resizes.
This fixes weird resizing from the left bugs when using GTK+, which is
really slow at acking configures.
This is an easy way to get into an infinite loop where we're constantly
re-sending stuff to the window. If it worked once, it probably won't
work again.
We assume in meta_window_wayland_move_resize that the next commit that
changes the geometry will always be for our next pending operation, so
if we have a move pending on a resize, the next commit will trigger the
move. This is, of course, fundamentally wrong.
We broke this assumption even more now that we don't fizzle out calls to
meta_window_move_resize_internal and now call it on every commit, which
means that a simple damage and then commit would complete a pending
move.
This was even broken by apps like weston-terminal, which, when clicking
on the maximize button, first redraws the terminal with the maximize
button state back on hover on press, and would only redraw when it got
the configure event with the coordinates.
To track the correct commit to apply the move for, we implement the
ack_configure request and ignore all move/resizes that happen before
that.
Right now, we actually fizzle out the entire move/resize if there's a
future pending configure we're waiting on.
When frame extents change, we might not update the frame rect, but the
buffer rect still needs to be updated. Split out the check for this to
be independent of the check for the frame rect.
This fixes issues that could happen when the window was maximized while
it was in the top-left corner.
When we changed the setting of the buffer rect to be inside the moving
code to make sure it was updated in places we were moving directly
without any round-trip needed, I removed a code to set the buffer rect
without remembering that's where the size of it was updated.
Add back the code to update the buffer rect.
This fixes Wayland windows not appearing.
Rather than calculate it speculatively with the current properties
which may be too new or too out of date, make sure it always fits
with the proper definition. We update it when we update the toplevel
window for X11, and when a Wayland surface is committed with a newly
attached buffer.
The requested_rect is a strange name for it, because it's not actually
the rect that the user or client requested all the time: in the case of
a simple move or a simple resize, we calculate some of the fields
ourselves.
To the MetaWindow subclass implementations, it just means "the rect
before we constrained it", so just use the name unconstrained_rect.
This also makes it match the name of the MetaWindow field.
Realistically, the user rect contains the unconstrained window
rectangle coordinates that we want to be displaying, in case
something in the constraints change.
Rename it to the "unconstrained_rect", and change the code to always
save it, regardless of current state.
When metacity was originally being built, the purpose of the user
rect was a lot less clear. The code only saved it on user actions,
with various other calls to save_user_window_placement() and a force
mechanism sprinkled in to avoid windows being snapped back to odd
places when constraints changed.
This could lead to odd bugs. For instance, if the user uses some
extension which automatically tiles windows and didn't pass
user_action=TRUE, and then the struts changed, the window would be
placed back at the last place a user moved it to, rather than where
the window was tiled to.
The META_IS_USER_ACTION flag is still used in the constraints code
to determine whether we should allow shoving windows offscreen, so
we can't remove it completely, but we should think about splitting
out the constrainment policies it commands for a bit more
fine-grained control.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726714
If we send out a configure notify for a window and then have some
other kind of state change, we need to make sure that we continue
to send out that new size, rather than the last size the client
sent us a buffer for.
In particular, a client might give us a 250x250 buffer and then
immediately request fullscreen. We send out a configure for the
monitor size and a state that tells it it's full-screen, but then
it takes focus, and since the client hasn't sent us a buffer for
the new size, we tell it it's fullscreen at 250x250.
Fix this.
Ugh. So in the fullscreen case, we need to make sure to specify that
it's a MOVE_ACTION so that we move to the saved position, but we
can't do that in the resizing case since we need to use the resized
rectangle.
The flags are really hurting us here. Perhaps we should make it the
client's responsibility to specify a complete rectangle which we
could resize to; then the weird-o logic would be self-contained in
each front-end.
I'm not convinced this covers all cases, especially when we could have
a dangling weird state pointer, but it fixes our existing two testcases.
Restoring the position in our move_resize_internal implementation
is too late. We need to do it at ack-time, before we hand off the
new position to the constraints code.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
Make sure to only use it for when we send out a configure notify. We
should use the passed in rectangle for other scenarios, like a
client-initiated resize.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
For the server-initiated resize case, like unmaximize or some forms
of tiling, we dropped the x/y of the server-assigned rectangle on the
floor, which meant the surface didn't move to where it needed to be in
that case. Now, save it internally, and combine it with the dx/dy passed
in during attaches to figure out where we actually need to be.
This fixes incorrect surface placement after unmaximization.
If we're sending out a configure event, we can't immediately move the
window; we need to instead wait to apply the new position when the
client sends a new buffer.
dx/dy should be against the regular window's rect, and need to
be ignored when we're resizing. Instead, we use gravity to anchor
the window's new rectangle when resizing.
