Moving the mouse over weston-terminal, we can see several issues:
* it often updates late, or not at all
* the attachment of the pointer sprite is wrong
These are because we willy-nilly call seat_update_sprite all over the
place, and often in wrong areas. Set up a set_pointer_surface helper
method that will do the right thing for us in all cases, and call it
on transitions.
Currently, set_cursor isn't properly working. Often, the requests look
like this:
cursor_surface = wl_compositor.create_surface()
cursor_buffer = create_cursor_buffer()
cursor_surface.attach(cursor_buffer, 0, 0)
cursor_surface.commit()
wl_pointer.set_cursor(cursor_surface, 7, 14)
But since the surface doesn't "have a role" when the commit comes in,
we ignore it, and don't do anything with the pending buffer. When
set_cursor is called, however, we don't immediately update anything
since it doesn't have a buffer.
This effectively means that set_cursor has unpredictable side effects.
Weston's toy toolkit reuses the same surface for every buffer, so it
only fails the first time. In clients that use a new surface for every
cursor sprite, the cursor is effectively invisible.
To solve this, change the code to always set the buffer for a surface,
even if it doesn't have any real role.
Refactor our commit() implementation out of wl_surface_commit(),
and pass the double-buffered state around to all our implementation
methods. This allows us to drop a few lines destroying and
reinitializing list of frame callbacks. This is a big cleanup for
the next commit, though.
To prevent corruption, our focus listener needs to be removed even when
the surface is destroyed. So, bailing out when pointer->focus->resource
is NULL just isn't good enough.
Implement support for synchronous subsurfaces commits. This means that
the client can, by calling wl_subsurface.set_sync, cause its surface
state to be commited not until its parent commits.
This will mean there will be will potentially be one more surface state
(regions, buffer) at the same time: the active surface state, the mutable
pending surface state, and the immutable surface state that was pending
on last surface commit.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705502
The placement set by either wl_subsurface.place_above or
wl_subsurface.place_below should be applied when the parent surface
invokes wl_surface.commit.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705502
The position set by wl_subsurface.set_position should be applied when
the parent surface invokes wl_surface.commit.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705502
Don't allow a client to stack a subsurface next to a subsurface with
another parent, or to a non-parent non-subsurface surface.
Signed-off-by: Jonas Ådahl <jadahl@gmail.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705502
This reverts commit ebe6e3180e.
This is wrong, as mutter's controlling TTY may not be the same
as the active VT, and in fact won't be in the case of systemd
spawning us.
The "correct" API for this is to use David Herrmann's
"Session Positions" system to switch to another VT:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2013-December/014956.html
As logind can give us a new FD at any time when it resumes. Theoretically,
this is still technically wrong, as the MetaCursorTracker holds onto it.
We'll fix this after we port to logind.
When we have a new client, we potentially set the focus on one of its
surfaces when we map it but the client might not have called
wl_seat.get_keyboard/pointer yet. When it finally calls
get_keyboard/pointer we must then register its resource as the
focus_resource which means that we can only return early if
focus_resource is already set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719725
Otherwise clutter events don't have their source actor properly set
and we aren't able to determine the MetaWindow to which a given
keybinding applies.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719724
Since subsurfaces won't have toplevel MetaWindowActors, we need to
use MetaSurfaceActor instead. These are embedded in the MetaWindowActor,
just like MetaShapedTexture was (in fact, MetaSurfaceActor now contains
a MetaShapedTexture)
