Providers that need drag-and-drop behavior can implement this via the
createResultObject() hook (as the app search provider already does), no
need to duplicate that code in the generic result objects
(ListSearchResult already does not implement DND).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734726
Following design mockups, animate the icons on AllView, FrequentView,
Dash and Search to zoom out when opening a new window of the app or when
the app is not running and the user execute it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734726
Given that we animate indicator in, it makes sense to animate them out
as well.
Also make possible animating indicators between view changes as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734726
Following design decision, we want to animate AllView and FrequentView
when opening and closing with a swarm spring form.
This involves a few changes needed to allow that, since from some time
now, we are animating page changes in viewSelector, using only a fade
transition. However now we want to let appDisplay and iconGrid apply its
own animation.
For that we special case the change to and from apps page on
viewSelector to let appDisplay to animate its own items, using and API
on appDisplay which at the same time uses an API on iconGrid.
Thanks Florian Müllner for the debugging work
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734726
Add a new animation to folder view based on designers mockups that
emulates pulsating icons.
The code on iconGrid is though to work well for the upcoming patches to
animate AllView and FrequentView.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734726
If you turn on natural scrolling, instead of swiping up, you need to
swipe down, which is bizarre. Just accept any type of scroll and have
them contribute to the delta.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734874
This reverts commit a84fb99c0a.
This commit didn't make the OSK fully operational yet on Wayland, and
caused the double emission of key events on X11 due to the OSK keys
receiving first touch events from the passive touch grab, and then
emulated pointer events from event selection after the touch sequence
was rejected in the grab.
When we make a better effort at handling touch events just once on X11,
this commit can be reapplied and remaining wayland OSK support resumed
from there. In the mean time, this patch is better reverted.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735681
Commit bbfa616f27 renamed _ignoreRelease to _ignoreUntilRelease
in some places, but not others, which broke GrabHelper.ignoreRelease().
Complete the name change to fix the fallout (e.g. app launcher menus
closing on button release).
The code from PanelMenu.Button assumed menus would open below their
source actor, making KEY_Down a good choice; however with the new
generic code, we should base the key used on the actual menu position.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
The behavior of opening/closing/navigating a menu from its source
actor is generic enough to not limit it to PanelMenu.Buttons, so
move the code into PopupMenu itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
Since mutter commit 527c53a2a0582eba, MetaWorkspace::window-removed
is emitted *before* MetaWindow:workspace is updated, so the test
whether the removed window should still be on the workspace in
question will always return true.
Assume the test is no longer necessary nowadays to fix this very
obvious regression.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735608
Currently we are removing tweens of the button and border, but not from
the title. That causes the title to be in wrong positions sometimes when
dragging windows on the overview, given that the slider is moving and
therefore the windows + overlay are moving too.
To avoid that, remove tweens of the title as well.
The code that loads SHELL_BACKGROUND_IMAGE, which is used to load the
performance background was loading it in WALLPAPER mode, not ZOOM
mode. Zoom mode is what we use for the actual GNOME defaultiwallpaper
and what we want to test: the background will be scaled except when
the resolution matches the 2560x1440 default backgrounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735385
Users can now toggle geolocation off/on from privacy panel of
gnome-control-center so we don't need to clutter the menu with a
settings that most users won't touch most of the time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731122
The scale passed to _updateChildrenScale is exclusively computed from
properties, so it can be moved into the function itself - as the scale
now becomes a mere detail, rename to a more appropriate _updateIconSizes
at the same time.
The existing code broke when commit 792b963bda changed the custom
result actor hook to return an object instead of an actor - stop
trying to go through a _delegate to make it work again.
Commit 14ceb10555 changed the "Open Calendar" item to open the
"recommended" calendar application rather than the default one to
avoid problems with MIME subclassing (namely falling back to the
default text editor when no calendar app is installed).
With this change however, the application launched does no longer
necessarily match the one configured in Settings, which is unexpected.
To avoid both problems, use the default calendar application again,
but only if it is in the list of recommended applications.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722333
We need to put the actual actors in the history, not just the labels,
otherwise all emptyLine (which are not messages but are not empty
either) and all lines with a timestamp will get stuck in the scrollback.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733899
We assumed that either a portal would give us a target URI, or we
would eventually reach the URI of our choice (which is http://www.gnome.org)
This is not always the case: even after a successful login we may
stay in a confirmation page, so make sure that every time we see a
redirect we trigger a connectivity check (or queue one for when
the user closes the window)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733848
Search providers that should be disabled by default come with
a DefaultDisabled=true key in their keyfile, and are enabled
with the "enabled" whitelist, not with the "disabled" blacklist.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734110
Performance testing was producing inconsistent values at different
times in the day since the GNOME default background is animated and
sometimes has a single layer, and sometimes two blended layers.
So we have consistent numbers, install a simple animated background
with GNOME Shell that has 40-year long transition ending in 2030,a
and set an environment variable in gnome-shell-perf-tool so that the
background is override with that background. (The background depends
on files installed by gnome-backgrounds; we assume that the person
running performance tests is doing so within the scope of a full
GNOME install.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734610
All derived classes are already checking explicitly for action names
(FOO and FOO_BACKWARDS). mutter used to have a META_KEY_BINDING_REVERSES
flag for keybindings which required special handling of "shift"+FOO as
FOO_BACKWARDS, but this has been removed now, so this special handling
is no longer necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732296
When this flag is set on a MetaKeyBinding, mutter will know that
the keybinding has an associated reverse keybinding triggered with
the shift modifier. However, an undesirable side-effect is that
gnome-control-center keyboard panel does not know that this 'shift'
is reserved for these reverse keybindings and cannot detect
conflicting bindings in this case.
This 'reverse' logic can now be handled at a higher level (in gcc keyboard
panel) so this commit removes it from gnome-shell so that they do not
conflict.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732296
Now that mutter gives a way to check if a MetaKeyBinding was marked as
'reversed' or not, gnome-shell does not have to hardcode that a
MetaKeyBinding using a shift modifier is reversed, it can directly check
if the appropriate flag is set.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=732296
We were setting the value of adjustment on size changes, but we weren't
changing the page value, so adjustment and page value was not in sync.
To fix it, make sure adjustment of the view is in sync with the page
value.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734680
