That way different system notifications, such as the ones about battery power
and the ones about software updates, are shown with separate message tray
sources.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664138
Implement the background-size CSS property, specified by the CSS
Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3, including the keywords
"contain", "cover", and fixed-size backgrounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633462
After an item is destroyed, all its signals were disconnected,
except for 'destroy' itself. This could lead to exceptions, if
destroy was called more than once on the item.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=665680
Instead of using an St.Tooltip to show the app's name under the icon,
manually position a new St.Label ourselves. Make sure to keep the label
hidden when right-clicking so it doesn't get in the way of the popup menu.
Only one tooltip/label will be displayed at a time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666166
It's not guaranteed that the application DBus proxy appears before
we receive the first focus event from the toplevel window.
Ensure that the first method to access the action muxer creates it if
hasn't been created yet.
We now have GRemoteActionGroup interface with the needed API,
implemented by GDBusActionGroup.
With the new API we could theoretically turn GActionMuxer itself into a
GRemoteActionGroup and expose the _full API to the shell so that the
timestamps could be passed from there.
Pass the current timestamp as platform data when activating
an action. This is implemented slightly hacky, since we use
clutter_get_current_event_time() to get at the timestamp, but
the alternative is to expose g_action_muxer_activate_action_full
to js, which would be quite a bit more involved.
GTK+ also exports window-specific actions, by putting the object path
for the exported action group in the _DBUS_OBJECT_PATH X property.
We add this action group to the app's muxer with a 'win' prefix,
since that is what the exported menu expects. Whenever the focus
window changes, we update the window-specific actions of its
application, and emit notify::action-group to cause the app
menu to be updated.
GDBusActionGroup api has changed again, adapt to that.
Also, use a GActionMuxer to add the 'app.' prefix to actions,
instead of manually stripping it out of the action names.
In the future, the muxer will also contain per-window actions
with a 'win.' prefix.
By the time the window is first mapped and the app menu button is
synced, we may not have finished reading the menu. In that case,
connect to notify::menu and update accordingly.
GMenuProxy has been replaced by GDBusMenuModel, and the object path
has been moved (now needs to be retrieved from the AppMenu GApplication
property).
Update the test to prefix each action with "app." as documented,
and use a GtkApplicationWindow instead of a plain GtkWindow.
Use the new GApplication support in ShellApp to create the application
menu. Supports plain (no state), boolean and double actions.
Includes a test application (as no other application uses GApplication
for actions)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621203
GDBusActionGroup and GMenuProxy are new objects in GIO 2.32 that
help with accessing menus and actions of remote applications.
This patch makes it possible for the shell to associate an
application with a dbus name and from that a GMenu, that will
be shown as the application menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621203
The loop can exit with an interval of length one or one of
length zero. In the first case it is correct to check which side
of the interval to return, in the second case no comparison should
be made (since there is only one possible value).
In practice, this usually results in one comparison more than needed,
but in some cases (when the position was past the end of the array),
would call the comparator with undefined.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666614
When transitioning from gnome-panel to gnome-shell in 3.0 we
lost the ability to summon the wisdom of the mythical fish.
This patch restores this, for the few adepts that are aware of
the magical incantation.
(Not as configurable as the original one, but it's an easter egg
after all...)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666606
Forcing the icon size will distort it unnecessarily, and will
in any case not work if showing an animation (which is a ClutterGroup).
Instead, set the size on the bin, and make it align its child
if needed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666606
grid_width and grid_height were inverted, which caused a crash
in GdkPixbuf code. This was never noticed because the animation
in the panel is a square.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666606
Previously the code in _accessPointAdded was iterating over the
the network list to find a good place, and at that time, added both
the network to the list and the item to the menu. When I refactored
to call queueCreateSection, I forgot to add code to insert the
network in the list.
Add it now, using the new Util.insertSorted function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666429
Adds two new functions, Util.lowerBound and Util.insertSorted,
that take an array, a value and a comparator, and find the
first position at which the value can be inserted without
violating the order, in optimal time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666429
By using Main.queueDeferredWork, we can ensure that most of the
menu contents (in particular, the heaviest parts like the list of
wifi networks) are not updated immediately as we receive signals
from NetworkManager. Instead, the menu is rebuilt some time later,
or as soon as the user opens the menu.
This means that it is no longer needed to optimize for the
access-point-added case, replacing a lot of buggy code with a safer
call to _queueCreateSection, which in turn should ensure that the
more menu, if existing, is always at the end and that at most 5 networks
are visible outside it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=664124
We need to notify when the channel dispatcher calls HandleChannels on
us with a channel we already handle. However, we don't want to notify
if we claim a new incoming channel which doesn't actually have
anything interesting in it yet.
For example, a new channel pops up just to give a delivery
notification. We want (or, need) to handle it but don't want to notify
for it.
Fixes: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=666243
Signed-off-by: Jonny Lamb <jonnylamb@gnome.org>
