Implement the background-size CSS property, specified by the CSS
Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3, including the keywords
"contain", "cover", and fixed-size backgrounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633462
Point the arrow to the center of the sourceActor's content box, rather
than its allocation, in case it has asymmetric padding (as the
rightmost message tray summary item does).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641728
The material of prerendered backgrounds is now painted in the
rectangle determined by st_theme_node_get_paint_box(). As the
ClutterActorBox returned from that function includes the space
needed to draw the box shadow, the background ends up occluding
the shadow.
As the box shadow is not part of the background, factor out a new
helper function which excludes the box shadow, and use it to
prerender and place the background material.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641522
Currently, "-st-shadow" can mean one of three very
different things:
1) shadow based on alpha of the background image
2) shadow the "border box" of the node
3) shadow applied to the content of a StIcon
It isn't well defined which of the above 3 cases
-st-shadow will mean for any given node, however.
This commit splits the property into three
different properties, "box-shadow",
"-st-background-image-shadow", and "icon-shadow"
to make it all very explicit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636976
non-absolute paths specified as url()'s in
stylesheets are resolved to be relative to the location
of the stylesheets they are in.
Inline styles don't have physical styleshseets sitting on disk,
which leads to a crash in the url resolving code.
This commit ensures that we don't try to use the stylesheet associated
with a url, if there isn't one to use.
This commit doesn't try to handle relative paths in inline styles.
It only prevents crashes when absolute paths are used.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636975
Aggressive compiler flags can cause the compiler to be smart enough
to inline functions and detect variables not being set on certain
code paths but not smart enough to understand the overall logic;
add some extra initializations to suppress the warnings.
Fix several minor bugs in the logic found when double checking the
logic before adding the initializations.
Based on a patch by Marc-Antoine Perennou <Marc-Antoine@Perennou.com>.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634225
A new StIconColors object is used to efficiently track the colors
we need to colorize a symbolic icon.
st_theme_node_compute_icon_colors() is added to compute the
StIconColors for a theme node. (Refcounting of StIconColors means
that we'll typically share the colors object of the parent node.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633865
* Make sure all source files have a LGPL copyright header, and standardize
non-standard variations of the header to a common form.
* Check and update all copyright notices.
* Remove 'Written By:' lines. They are universally incomplete and
typically indicate only who started a particular file.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=634550
Although within St itself there are situations where the semantics of
these functions (return TRUE or FALSE and return the actual value in
an out parameter) is useful, it's mostly just annoying at the
application level, where you generally know that the CSS property is
going to specified, and there is no especially sane fallback if it's
not.
So rename the current methods to lookup_color, lookup_double, and
lookup_length, and add new get_color, get_double, and get_length
methods that don't take an "inherit" parameter, and return their
values directly. (Well, except for get_color, due to the lack of (out
caller-allocates) in gjs.)
And update the code to use either the old or new methods as appropriate.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=632590
Reorganize the existing code which parses the -st-shadow property
to allow parsing different shadow properties and add support for
the text-shadow property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624384
If a shadow property is inherited from a parent, multiple StThemeNodes
share a common StShadow. It would be possible to use st_shadow_copy()
for this purpose, but proper reference counting is nicer.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624384
Add basic support for background-position, which only supports absolute
values.
Also don't require an unit to be specified for 0 (because the unit does not
really matter here 0 is 0 regardless of the unit).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=624375
Add st_theme_node_paint_equal() and use that to do two things:
1) Avoid animating transitions where nothing changes.
2) Copy cached painting state from the old theme node to the new
theme node.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=627083
"text-align" allows setting the alignment of text, with respect to
other lines and allocated space, without requiring a reference to
the ClutterText (which is private for most widgets).
If not specified, all text is left-aligned.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622447
It has probably crossed the line to evil by a mile or so, but here
it is: a Tweener.slowDownFactor replacement used by all animations
without exception.
While at it, update Tweener to use the new setTimeScale() upstream
function instead of adjusting the timeline directly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=622249
StThemeNodes may have properties - namely shadows - which paint
outside an actor's allocation. This is not a problem unless drawing
is redirected to an offscreen buffer, in which case the actually
painted size is needed in advance when setting up the buffer.
Add a convenience method to calculate an allocation large enough to
paint the node.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619025
Add st_theme_node_equal() - two nodes are considered equal iff they
refer to identical elements, so e.g. .example and .example:hover are
not equal, even if no .example:hover rule exists in the CSS.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619025
I have no idea why there existed code that if we saw e.g. min-width
without a width, we assigned min-width to ->width, thus effectively
treating it as a maximum.
Just delete that bit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=618482
The (optional) spread radius allows to make the shadow bigger without
enlarging the blur value. Mozilla supports this parameter for the
-moz-box-shadow property.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=613832
StThemeNode holds a reference to its parent, but we never released
that reference. This could cause us to hold onto whole chains
of theme nodes with rather dire memory usage implications.
Also move the other g_object_unref into _dispose.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=614660
The idea behind this move is that we have a lot more control over
rendering if StWidget isn't a big pile of actors, and things are
more efficient.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=607500
st_theme_node_adjust_preferred_width/height now limit the content area
of an actor to the max, if given. (The requested width/height may be
larger to make room for borders, etc.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=606755
Some theme authors have stated interest in radial gradient backgrounds.
The w3c has some draft:
http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-images/#radial-gradients
As this is rather complex, we add only some very basic support, which
extends our syntax for linear gradients:
background-gradient-direction: [vertical|horizontal|radial]
Gradients are centered circles, whose size is determined by the closest
side.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604945
Add support for a new -st-shadow property, which is based loosely
on the CSS3 box-shadow property:
http://www.css3.info/preview/box-shadow/
It defers from the specification as follows:
* no multiple shadows
* the optional color argument may be placed anywhere
* the shape is not determined by the widget's bounding box,
but by the background-image property
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=603691
Rather than having gradients be individually implemented by higher
level JS widgets, move basic gradient functionality into StWidget.
There is prior art in WebKit for CSS gradients:
http://webkit.org/blog/175/introducing-css-gradients/
However, implementing this would be quite a lot of work; all we
need in the Shell design at the moment is basic horizontal/vertical
linear gradients. So, the syntax now supported is:
background-gradient-type: [vertical|horizontal]
background-gradient-start: color;
background-gradient-end: color;
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602131
An earlier commit was overzealous in removing (out) annotations;
introspection supports (out) for integral types just fine, we
only need to remove them for (out) types where the caller needs
to allocate a boxed type.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=602131
If the space we're allocated is too small for our border + padding
constraints, don't give negative allocations to callers. Squash
to zero.
It isn't really useful for callers to get negative content sizes,
and certainly breaks most allocation code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=600734
The behavior in respect to borders matches CSS - the properties set the size of
the content exclusive of the borders (CSS3 box-sizing property - not implemented
here - changes this).
min-width/min-height correspond very closely to the CSS meanings.
width/height are a little different from the CSS meanings - the CSS meaning is
"exactly this size unless overridden by min/max-width/height" - but within the
realm of our layout algorithm, making them control natural size is pretty
close.
This way we can force elements to have a fixed natural or minimum size.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598651
To work around a problem where libcroco < 0.6.2 can't handle
functions starting with 'r' or 'u', preconvert 'rgba' to 'RGBA'
when parsing stylesheets and then check for rgba()
case-insensitively.
(libcroco is uniformly case-sensitive, though the CSS spec requires
that ASCII should be handled case-insensitively.)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597054
round() is a C99 addition, so causes portability problems:
different C library versions require different #defines to
enable it. So simply avoid using it.
