We have been using type-safe comparisons in new code for quite a while
now, however old code has only been adapted slowly.
Change all the remaining bits to get rid of another legacy style
difference.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2866>
Start using the new methods to simplify signal cleanup. For now,
focus on replacing existing cleanups; in most cases this means
signals connected in the constructor and disconnected on destroy,
but also other cases with a similarly defined lifetime (say: from
show to hide).
This doesn't change signal connections that only exist for a short
time (say: once), handlers that are connected on-demand (say: the
first time a particular method is called), or connections that
aren't tracked (read: disconnected) at all.
We will eventually replace the latter with connectObject() as
well - especially from actor subclasses - but the changeset is
already big enough as-is :-)
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1953>
We have made good progress on object literals as well, although there
are still a lot that use the old style, given how ubiquitous object
literals are.
But the needed reindentation isn't overly intrusive, as changes are
limited to the object literals themselves (i.e. they don't affect
surrounding code).
And given that object literals account for quite a bit of the remaining
differences between regular and legacy rules, doing the transition now
is still worthwhile.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2200>
Right now, _setIconSize() calculates the icon size everytime the
preferred height of AppSwitcher is calculated, which happens quite
often.
Reduce the perfomance impact by only calculating the icon size once.
This has the added benefit of preventing unexpected changes to the icon
sizes while the switcher is open.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2098>
Just like in the parent _onItemMotion() function, we should check for
reentrancy in our override.
Because the hover timeout will prevent a new selection from happening
for some time, in addition to checking for this._highlighted reentrancy,
we also need to track the item that's being hovered during the timeout.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/2098>
The switcherPopups use _next() and _previous() to get the items
in the text direction. I. e. with LTR _next() gets the right item;
on RTL it gets the left item. This doesn't work well with RTL when using
the arrow keys since the text direction doesn't matter in those cases.
Pressing Left Arrow should still move left regardless of text direction.
So use the opposite methods.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2547
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1835>
The arrow of the removed app was still left in the list with the
visibility of the arrow still depending on the original list order. This
could either lead to apps with just one window now suddenly having a
down arrow or apps with multiple windows not having one. If the last
window in the list had a down arrow, it would have been displayed
outside the window switcher.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2935https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1340
Just as with the last commit, we should not break the assumption made by
Clutter that parents have their allocation set before their children get
allocated, so fix that here, too.
In this case we have to fix it by chaining up to the parent vfunc
override and updating the allocation once more before allocating the
`this._label` child.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/1615
The thumbnails actor `this._thumbnails` has already been destroyed when
calling `_destroyThumbnails()` from the `destroy` signal handler because
it is a child actor of the AppSwitcherPopup. So stop destroying the
thumbnails separately (fading them out inside a destroy handler wouldn't
make sense anyway).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Right now the index that gets selected on click and motion events is set
when connecting the event inside the addItem function. If items are
added or removed (for example when an application is closed by pressing
"q"), this index isn't valid anymore and has to be updated.
To fix this, use the items themselves instead of the index as arguments
for the event handlers and lookup the index of the item inside the event
handler.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
Set the accessible states of the switcherList items by calling a
function instead of manipulating class-internal variables from outside
the class, which is considered bad practice.
The check whether the item at `_selectedIndex` exists can also be
removed since we always select a new index after an item was removed
(i.e. an app was closed) and destroy the alt-tab switcher right away if
no more items exist (see `SwitcherPopup._itemRemovedHandler`).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/167
If a new SwitcherPopup is created and there are no windows or apps to
switch through found, instead of returning from _init(), still
initialize the SwitcherPopup and let the check in SwitcherPopup.show()
return false to terminate the popup.
In both cases, with or without the return statements,
WindowManager._startSwitcher() will call SwicherPopup.destroy(), which
will try to disconnect signal handlers, destroy actors etc. Now if the
constructor can't finish creating the popup, some of the functions
called from _onDestroy() will fail and throw errors.
One of those cases is when window-switcher is limited to the current
workspace, and a WindowCyclerPopup is initiated on an empty workspace.
Because this._highlight hasn't been created, _onDestroy() will fail when
trying to destroy the actor of this._highlight.
Also, the actor of this._switcherList will not get destroyed in case
show() returns because this._items is empty. For example, this will
happen when a new AppSwitcherPopup is initialized with at least 1
running app, but 0 windows on the active workspace.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/168
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
If an else block only contains an if statement, the two can be
combined into an if-else block, which cuts down on indentation
and usually helps legibility.
There are exceptions (for instance where the outer if and else
blocks are mirrored), but where it makes sense, change the code
to avoid lonely ifs.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Clutter originally cluttered its namespace with key symbols, before
prefixing all symbols with KEY. We still use the unprefixed symbols
occasionally, replace them so mutter can drop the deprecated symbols.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/808
Every since commit aa394754, StBoxLayout has supported ClutterActor's
expand/align properties in addition to the container-specific child
properties. Given that that's the only container left with a special
child meta, it's time to fully embrace the generic properties (and
eventually remove the child meta).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/780
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
