It may happen that the app icon is destroyed with a drag
monitor still around, in which case, a load of warnings
will be shown.
Make sure to remove any pending drag monitor on destroy.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/841
When removing the last icon of a folder, FolderView first removes
the folder from org.gnome.desktop.app-folders.folder-children, then
proceeds to reset all its keys, which removes the relocatable schema.
That order of operations turns out to be problematic. Removing the
folder from 'folder-children' destroys the folder icon, which in turn
destroys the folder view, which throws a load of warnings in the
journal.
Fix that by removing the folder after resetting the schema keys. In
fact, what we're doing here is not using 'this' anymore.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/841
The variable that holds the list of application icons is
called 'newApps', but that technically was never true,
since we only create new app icons when necessary.
Rename it to 'appIcons'.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/841
The views (AllView and FrequentView) build a list of all applications
they contain. BaseView then diffs between what's currently added, and
what needs to be added, and removed.
This approach has a problem though: creating an AppIcon or a FolderIcon
connects to various signals, and we confuse the garbage collector.
When building the list of applications, instead of always creating new
icons, try to use already existing icons first.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1610
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1694
The FolderView class is responsible for creating the 4-item
grid of the folder icon, with the preview of the first four
apps inside the folder.
However, with the deprecation of StAlign as child properties,
the folder icon stopped being horizontally centralized.
Center the folder icon horizontally again.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/817
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
The event blocker in AllView is responsible for stealing click events
from the icon grid and closing the folder popup. The event blocker is
kept unreactive when no folder popup is visible, and it's made reactive
as a response to the 'open-state-changed' signal.
Using this signal, though, is problematic. When opening an app folder,
the icon grid first opens space for the folder to fit in; during this
period, it's possible to click on another folder icon, and break the
icon grid state.
Make sure the event blocker is reactive immediately after clicking on
a folder icon.
Related: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1470https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/816
Clutter originally cluttered its namespace with key symbols, before
prefixing all symbols with KEY. We still use the unprefixed symbols
occasionally, replace them so mutter can drop the deprecated symbols.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/808
xgettext got better at recognizing template strings, so we can
replace more string concatenations. Alas xgettext is still buggy
(surprise, regular expressions are hard), so there are still a
handful of holdouts that prevent us from making a complete switch.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/792
It seems like some recent change (maybe the move to a ClutterActor
subclass for AppIcon) broke the check whether the drag source is an
instance of AppIcon. While the drag source indeed is an AppIcon and
everything else works correctly, the check still returns false, which
breaks the creation of new folders using DnD.
Theoretically it makes sense that this doesn't work, because we're
assigning AppIcon using `var AppIcon =` and that will only get set after
`GObject.register_class()` finished, so accessing `AppIcon` inside that
function seems risky and is probably wrong.
Fix this by comparing to `this.constructor` instead of `AppIcon`, which
works fine and we know for sure exists at this point.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/794
g_desktop_app_info_get_categories() may return null. In that case, the
previous code would fail to create a folder when dragging an app with
no categories onto another app. Instead, simply continue with the next
app info.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/782
Since all the search result classes are now GObject classes, we can enforce
the methods we want to have in there (just activate() for now) using an
interface, to make sure they are implementing what we require and to easily
group all the classes that can be used as search results, even though they
are not extending SearchResult.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
The RenameFolderMenu uses the internal box as a menu item, while PopupMenu
expects to have PopupBaseMenuItem based children with a delegate set.
Instead of using a custom menu with a customized box acting as menu
item,just add a RenameFolderMenuItem that inherits from the parent,
adjusting the features as we need them. In fact, the rename folder menu item
doesn't need any label, padding or default styling so we can reuse
PopupMenuBaseItem after we use our styling properties and we set the
Ornament to HIDDEN.
To get the proper style in place, define rename-folder-popup and
rename-folder-popup-item to override the default popup-menu-item rule
padding instead of using margins.
Pass the menu item as menu's focusActor as this will key-focus it on pop-up,
by overriding the key_focus_in() vfunc we can then delegate the focus
handling to the entry's clutter-text.
Also override the map() vfunc in order to update the entry's content before
mapping the entry.
Finally, use the item's activate method in order to tell the parent menu
we're done with it and that the menu can be closed.
As consequence we can also remove the menu's popup() method, and just use
the default open().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/720
When the rename folder menu is opened the text entry is expected to be
focused and selected for a quick editing.
While this is required it doesn't actually happens since PopupMenu by
default gives the key focus to the source actor, that is then free to pass
the key focus to the menu if there's an user interaction.
In this case however, we want the text entry to be focused once we prompt
the menu, so just use the PopupMenu's focusActor property to ensure it will
handle it for us.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1604https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/720
Add a `animateLaunchAtPos()` method to the AppIcon class to animate the
launch of an app at a given position. This allows for a visual
indication of whether dropping an app icon using DnD was successful at
the position the drop happened in a later commit.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
`AppIcon.shellWorkspaceLaunch()` can easily be replaced by checking for
`AppIcon.app` and calling `AppIcon.app.open_new_window()` directly.
For compatibility and to prevent breaking extensions implementing the
function, keep supporting the `shellWorkspaceLaunch` API in AppIcon
while logging a deprecation warning. Also keep supporting the API on
drag sources (without deprecating it) to allow extensions to define
custom actions on their drag sources.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/121
As arrow functions have an implicit return value, an assignment of
this.foo = bar could have been intended as a this.foo === bar
comparison. To catch those errors, we will disallow these kinds
of assignments unless they are marked explicitly by an extra pair
of parentheses.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/731
We are currently inconsistent whether to put the operators in front
of the corresponding line or at the end of the preceding one. The
most dominant style for now is to put condition and first branch on
the same line, and then align the second branch:
let foo = condition ? fooValue
: notFooValue;
Unfortunately that's a style that eslint doesn't support, so to account
for it, our legacy configuration currently plainly ignores all indentation
in conditionals.
In order to drop that exception and not let messed up indentation slip
through, change all ternary operators to the non-legacy style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
Some more places where the indentation doesn't comply with either
the old or new style. They slipped through because the legacy eslint
configuration accounts for some patterns by plainly ignoring certain
nodes. We'll address that later, first fix up the indentation errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/725
We currently use no less than three different ways of indenting
object literals:
let obj1 = {
foo: 42,
bar: 23,
};
let obj2 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23 };
let obj3 = { foo: 42,
bar: 23
};
The first is the one we want to use everywhere eventually, while the
second is the most commonly used "legacy" style.
It is the third one that is most problematic, as it throws off eslint
fairly badly: It violates both the rule to have consistent line breaks
in braces as well as the indentation style of both regular and legacy
configurations.
Fortunately the third style was mostly used for tween parameters, so
is quite rare after the Tweener purge. Get rid of the remaining ones
to cut down on pre-existing eslint errors.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/716
Add a new popover with a regular entry + button to rename
folders. The layout is similar to other GNOME applications.
The popup is implemented as a PopupMenu subclass, leaving
the grab management to PopupMenuManager.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/675
Create a new folder when dropping an icon over another
icon. Try and find a good folder name by looking into
the categories of the applications.
Delete the folder when removing the last icon.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/671
Because the Dash icons are not drop targets themselves,
add a tiny DashIcon class, which is an AppDisplay.AppIcon
subclass, and disable all DND drop code from it.
Show a folder preview when dragging an app icon over another
app icon.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/671
As per design direction, scale and fade the app icon
when starting dragging it, and show it again if the
drop is accepted. Clutter takes care of animating the
rest of icon positions through implicit animations.
Scale and fade the dragged icon while it's being dragged.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/671
Just as we animate the apps launch using the zoom out animation if the
'new-window' action provided by the app is launched, we should also show
this animation if the 'activate-discrete-gpu' action provided by the app
via its AppInfo is launched.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/673
For the "New Window" entry we add to the AppIcons popup menu we should
always animate the app icon if the menu entry is activated as it was
intended by commit 62786c09a8.
For the "Launch using Dedicated Graphics Card" entry we can also always
show the animation if the entry is activated since the entry should only
be visible if the app is stopped.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/673
