Remove the default icon size of -1 and always set the container StBin to
a real size. This fixes an error where the "width" and "height"
properties get set to -2 (which is -1 * scaleFactor) in the `_init`
function.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1018
To make sure the GC really disposes the KeyboardController object we
need to remove all references to the object, which means we have to
disconnect signals the object connects to, too.
This also fixes a bug where keys remain pressed forever and thus also
break that key on real keyboards. It happens if the OSK gets destroyed
during an OSK-key is being held so the StButton of the key is not
released. That means the key remains pressed in the
MetaVirtualInputDevice that we are now leaking because
KeyboardController isn't garbage collected.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1015
xgettext gained some support for template strings, and no longer
fails when encountering '/' somewhere between backticks.
Unfortunately its support is still buggy as hell, and it is now
silently dropping translatable strings, yay. I hate making the
code worse, but until xgettext really gets its shit together,
the only viable way forward seems to be to not use template
strings in any files listed in POTFILES.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1014
Since quite a few strings of dialogs provided by external programs are
not updated yet and the string freeze is already in effect, make sure we
don't break those dialogs by stripping aways large parts of the
headline.
To do that, detect if the title label is larger than the available width
and if it is, switch to a smaller font-size of 13pt. This makes sure we
still show about the same number of characters in the headline as we did
in previous releases.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1012
With the old screen shield, we were simply hiding the lightboxes to show
the shield when the user became active after activating the shield but
before locking the screen (that is, when using a lock-delay).
However now that the shield is gone, we end up showing the unlock dialog
even though we are not actually locked.
We probably don't want to add back a shield-like mode (that is, a way to
raise the unlock dialog without authentication when we aren't locked),
so just deactivate the whole shield when the user becomes active again
before the lock kicks in.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2213
The design team discussed the ellipses at the end of the hint text of
our entries and, even though they are present in most mockups, it turned
out they don't like them, so remove them.
It also turned out they don't like the prefixes like "Enter" before it,
so remove those, too.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
With the new dialog design the descriptions of entries are now
implemented as hint-text of the StEntry. That means the colon at the end
of the descriptions no longer makes sense and should be removed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/977
Currently separators get all the padding from regular menu items,
which is excessive for non-interactive elements.
Shuffle style classes around a bit to allow overriding the normal
padding for separators.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/1004
Shift, caps-lock and friends change the capitalization of following
key presses. It is unexpected for those keys to have side-effects,
so don't switch to the prompt when they are pressed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
We don't want to show a caps-lock warning when showing a non-password
entry, but we also don't want the layout to jump when changing the
label's visibility.
Achieve that by inserting an empty placeholder label that we can
show whenever the caps-lock warning is hidden.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
The promptBox is initially fully opaque, so showing it before the
transition can result in a brief flash before fading in.
Just remove the show() call and let the transition handle the
visibility.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2212
Usually, logging in or unlocking the session is made asynchronously,
and AuthPrompt properly manages which entry is currently visible.
External code don't rely on any specific entry to be set, since it
is AuthPrompt's responsibility to select the correct one to be shown.
However, there's one specific case where AuthPrompt must preserve
the password entry: on reset. The reset code preserved whatever
entry was currently displayed, but after fe69dacaf1, it always
changes to the username entry.
Make sure to show the password entry on reset.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the past, the session menu button was part of the auth prompt widgetry,
so we didn't have to manually hide it when showing the user list. However,
now it is part of the login screen itself.
Hide the session menu button when the user list is shown.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
In the common case where we only have a single unread notification
from a particular app, the count doesn't add useful information.
Reduce clutter a bit by only showing the notification count if we
have at least two.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/997
Clicking or typing to reveal the auth prompt are good options for
mouse/keyboard workflows, but awkward on touch devices. Now that
we have SwipeTracker, adding corresponding gestures support is
easy, so do just that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
The current transition between clock and auth prompt uses a simple
crossfade.
"What kind of spatial model is that?!"
T.B.
Root the transition a bit more by adding translation and scale to
the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, when a null user is passed, we don't add any
username label. That makes the layout of user and no-user
cases inconsistent.
Add a ghost label with no opacity to mimic the username
label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
If username-based login flow is followed, we need a default avatar
for the userWidget. Hence, check if the user passed to userWidget
is (null) which implies a username-based login flow.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Allow vertical orientation for the userWidget so that the user-avatar
can be centered and user's name can be placed below it. The plan
for 3.36 is to use this vertical userWidget layout for both lock
and login screen.
The userWidget is also used while creating the user-selection list
at the login, hence we still need to keep the horizontal layout
for userWidget in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Since the blur sigma decides how many pixels get factored in when
blurring and setting a scale factor increases the background texture by
that factor, the sigma value should also be multiplied by the scale
factor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/991
There is nothing else to be focused in the lock screen itself -- the
top bar is already handled elsewhere, and the dialog manages itself
now.
Remove the lock screen group from the Ctrl-Alt-Tab manager.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
AuthPrompt is the set of actors that contain the user avatar,
the username, and the password entry. With the removal of the
screen shield, the unlock dialog (be it UnlockDialog or the
LoginDialog) is always created, and in the case of UnlockDialog,
so is the auth prompt.
This is problematic, though, since for passwordless accounts,
the simple act of creating AuthPrompt authenticates the user,
and lifts the lock screen.
Create the AuthPrompt on demand in UnlockDialog.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
As per the latest lock screen mockups, critical notifications must have
a more prominent, solid color.
Add a .critical style class to critical notification bubbles, and make
them darker.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Now that the screen shield is gone (at least, as it used to
be), the corresponding session mode is not necessary anymore
as well.
Remove the 'lock-screen' session mode, and the corresponding
CSS.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Pretty much what the commit title says.
This gives the lock shield actor another role: instead of
being the interactive screen shield, make it the invisible
actor that prevents interacting with windows while the
unlock dialog is sliding down.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Activating a dialog is slightly different from opening it; the
former is about showing the user authentication widgetry, while
the latter is about creating it and pre-allocating the necessary
resources.
Activate the screen shield dialog when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The 'onPrimary' argument was being passed to dialog.open(). Turns out,
neither UnlockDialog nor LoginDialog use this parameter.
Remove the unnecessary 'onPrimary' parameter, and cleanup the related
code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The use of the core idle monitor means that focus change events
are also delayed by keyboard interaction. Since the magnifier is
already in the business of pointer tracking, it's easy enough to
fire the pointer rest timeout from here, so focus changes are
accumulated and delayed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
We may get several a11y events setting the caret on the same
coordinates it previously was. Make focus tracking ignore those,
as we're jumping to the same coordinates again during eg. mouse
operation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the crosshair is clipped so it doesn't cover the pointer cursor,
the clip rectangle is skewed towards the bottom/right. This was
made so to accomodate the default pointer, but the unevenness stays
on other pointer cursors, and it makes the crosshair look odd on
short crosshair length.
Make all lines clip to an even distance from the center instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
It is somewhat unexpected that crosshair color and pointer cursor colors
remain the same across changes in color inversion settings, and may lead
to contrast issues. Apply the effect on the common container, so it
applies to these all.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the icon proper has opacity of zero then that's probably because a
clone of it is animating. So avoid animating the source actor too.
And if there's any other reason for the opacity being zero, still don't
animate it because we can't see it :)
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2167
