Instead of taking care of the PanelMenu.ButtonBox.container
destruction by itself, delegate that to the very object that
created it in the first place: PanelMenu.ButtonBox itself.
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
Since the workarea and margins are both in pysical pixels dimensions (we
fetch margins from Clutter, not from the theme), but the CSS expects
logical (scaled) pixels, unless we consider the scale factor when
setting max-height, it won't work on a HiDpi display.
This fixes missing scrollbars when the calendar popup is full on HiDpi
displays.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753305
Commit 08690d658f generalized the banner-blocking behavior of the
dateMenu to all menus that would obscure the banner. However setting
up the 'open-state-changed' handler only when an indicator is added
does not work for indicators that change their entire menu (like the
app menu) - we currently end up with menus with no connected signal
handler, and throw an error when trying to disconnect an invalid
signal ID.
To address this, add a new PanelButton::menu-set signal and use that
to set up the 'open-state-changed' handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
When opening a panel menu, we set it's max-height to the available
work-area height to keep menus with scrollable content from growing
outside the monitor. However a menu that extends all the way down
to the bottom edge does not look great either, so also take margins
into account here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744498
The behavior of opening/closing/navigating a menu from its source
actor is generic enough to not limit it to PanelMenu.Buttons, so
move the code into PopupMenu itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
No sequence checks are done, these UI elements promptly trigger a grab that
will cancel ongoing touches and redirect later ones somewhere else, so that
works as a barrier to multi-toggling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
There's only two uses of the parameter left, which can easily be added as a
separate line below. Since it's really a private interface meant for the
indicators, make it private as well so external users are less likely to
use it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
To align the arrows, we need to allocate panel buttons the full
height of the tray. Fix up all of the panel buttons to support this,
and align the arrows in the middle.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
Swap out the implementation of SystemIndicator with a dummy,
and build the aggregate menu. At the same time, remove the
poweroff and login screen menus, as those were fake aggregate
menus beforehand.
We lose some flexibility as we lose session-mode-based menu
layout, but as each component of the aggregate menu is supposed
to be "smart" in response to updating itself when session
state changes, I believe it's better than a declarative model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
We can't silently replace the old behavior of separate status
icons into a new system. Replace SystemStatusButton with a new
SystemIndicator class which will allow for the flexibility we
need. For now, make it a subclass of Button so that it mostly
feels the same, but we'll soon be swapping it out with a dummy
implementation that the aggregate menu will use.
I think the code cleanup here is worth it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
A PanelMenuButton added to the top bar might not be visible at all
times. If it is hidden while the corresponding menu is open, we
currently don't do anything at all, e.g. the menu remains open
pointing to an arbitrary location in the top bar.
Instead, close the menu automatically in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703540
Instead of faking it by adding a bunch of main icons and secondary
icons to our own box, try and recreate the original button box
with the original icons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690589
Panel already forces each item to be a PanelMenu.Button, so it's better
to have the latter handle the bin container too, instead of attaching
a private property that might collide with internal usage by the indicator.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683156
If we don't freeze the presence icon, we can end up in a place where
we'll be updating the icon before we fade out the panel indicators when
coming back from the lock screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683156
Since we eventually want to add a system for changing the top panel
contents depending on the current state of the shell, let's use the
"session mode" feature for this, and add a mechanism for updating the
session mode at runtime. Add support for every key besides the two
functional keys, and make all the components update automatically when the
session mode is changed. Add a new lock-screen mode, and make the lock
screen change to this when locked.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683156
The design has a combined volume-network-power indicator in the lock
screen, which when opened shows a volume slider. Implement it by abstracting
the volume menu into a PopupMenuSection, and by creating three StIcons
bound to the real ones.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682540
Track locked status and use it to provide a reduced version of
the panel in the locked screen. Accessibility, input sources and
volume menus are preserved, without the link to the control center.
Network, battery and user menu are reduced to pure indicators,
with no menu.
This is similar to the design but not exactly, because designers
in IRC said that network needs more analysis before exposing, and
because the design didn't account for a11y and IM (so the one menu
metaphor is not really appropriate).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619955
Previously, PanelMenuButton would only set max width if the user
explicitly clicked the menu button, resulting in submenus without scrollbars
if opened via keyboard navigation or mouse over.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658946
Use the new GApplication support in ShellApp to create the application
menu. Supports plain (no state), boolean and double actions.
Includes a test application (as no other application uses GApplication
for actions)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=621203
js2-mode is no longer developed and we recommend js-mode these days,
so switch the modelines to specify that, and make them consistent
across all files.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=660358
Simplify the layout in rightBox by getting rid of statusBox, and just
putting everything into rightBox directly.
Simplify the handling of the user menu by adding it like it was a
status icon rather than special-casing it. Rename the "tray_icon"
variables to "status_area" to reflect this better.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=651299
The chrome layer contains the user interface elements (e.g.,
the panel) that disappear when fullscreen windows get displayed.
Panel menus are currently put in the chrome layer, but don't need
to be, since they are only displayed when the user is interacting
with the shell and not a fullscreen application.
Putting panel menus in the chrome layer does mean they will get
stacked below shell interface elements that aren't in the chrome layer,
though.
This commit changes panel menus to be on the same layer as most other
shell elements, so they get properly stacked above those elements.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=657082
Extensions often want to add items to the system status area, so it
is useful to add a convenience API for it. Also, we now allow
for cleaner destruction of panel objects, by just calling destroy()
on it.
Based on a patch by Jasper St. Pierre.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=653205
The specs call for a 2 pixel gap between the panel and its menus,
though we need to specify this as 4 pixels, since it's relative to the
bottom of the icon/title, not the bottom of the panel (up until now,
the point of the menu arrow was actually overlapping the menu's
highlight underline).
Also, move the gap specification into the CSS, since it makes more
sense there.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=655627
