Clutter no longer hard-codes a resolution of 96 DPI (although that's
still the default), so any assertions of sizes for physical units
may be off.
Fix this by setting up the test environment according to the
assumptions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/419
Since we started to support tray icons on wayland, the icon we show
is not the actual XEmbed window. Instead, we let mutter create a
MetaWindow for it, then use its window actor as source for a clone
we (or nowadays: extensions) can add, remove and destroy freely.
To not let the real icon get in the way, we set an empty input shape
and make its window actor fully transparent. This works OK on X11,
but on wayland all events still go through Clutter, so any reactive
surface actor inside the window actor will block events for any actors
underneath (and status icons go into the top-windows group, so almost
all actors are affected).
Luckily we can pile another hack onto the pile of status icon hacks ...
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/191
While it is possible to register accelerators in-bulk, there is no
proper way to unregister them again. This adds the corresponding call
for UngrabAccelerator to allow ungrabbing multiple accelerators at the
same time.
The idea is that g-s-d can use this in the future to simplify the
keybinding reload logic.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/429
Commit 8f15193b4 changed the `policy` property from a regular JS property to
a getter. This was necessary to avoid calling an overridden _createPolicy()
method before a subclass is properly initialized, but it broke the second
way of using notification sources:
Don't create a Source subclass, but use the base class directly and change
its `policy` property.
There's no good reason why we should no longer allow this, so add a setter.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/431
The dialog doesn't change the `destroyOnClose` property from its default,
so it is already destroyed automatically on close. So if we also destroy
it explicitly, we end up (rightfully) with one of gjs' infamous "invalid
access" warnings.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/430
If a result is displayed at the end of the search results, there should
obviously not be a line separating it from the next result underneath
it. To fix this, always hide the separator for the last result visible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/311
While mapping the :first/:last-child pseudo classes directly to the
ClutterActor:first-child/:last-child properties allows for an easy
implementation, it is unexpected that rules can appear to not have
an effect because the selected child is hidden. GTK's behavior of
applying the classes to visible children makes much more sense, so
change our implementation to do the same.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/312
When we grab a screenshot of a framebuffer scaled shell, we shoudl apply the
device scale to the image surface, while the monitor scaling should be applied
to the cursor surface, so that it's painted at proper coordinates and in proper
size in the generated image.
This is not needed for XWayland clients as they are not scaled anyways, while
for wayland clients that are painted in multiple monitors, this might cause
a lower quality cursor in the lower dpi monitor, because the cursor sprite is
generated for the monitor scale, and not for the surface scale.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Under wayland, if the cursor should be included when doing a fullscreen
screenshot, we can rely on mutter "paint" signal to have it composited for free.
Otherwise if it's not requested, we can use the "actors-painted" signal to get a
stage texture before the mouse overlay has been added.
Instead, under X11 or when only a window screenshot is requested, we still
need to draw it manually.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Get from clutter the capture sizes and scale and don't mind
about doing any rounding here, as it might be different
from the one done at clutter level (causing mismatch and
not-working videos). Delegate this to clutter, and forget
about the internal details.
These values are then used to composte the image and set the video caps.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7650111
It might happen that the target clutter actor that we return on call
of st_texture_cache_load_sliced_image might be destroyed while the
loading task is still running. To protect from this, let's connect
to "destroy" signal and when this happens we use a cancellable to
stop the task.
This allows to safely reuse the return value of this function to
cancel the execution and avoiding that load_callback is called
even for a request that is not anymore under our control.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
When loading an actor for a sliced image actor, we can now use the
REQUEST_CONTENT_SIZE request-mode for the actor since we the content image
has now a predictable size and thus we can be sure that the size will be applied
taking care of the resource scale.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Create StImageContent as a simple ClutterImage with preferred width/height
properties in order to be able to use explicit sizing when creating clutter
contents that will be applied to actors whose size depends on the content itself.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
Instead of just passing a scale when getting a cached icon, pass both a
'paint_scale', the scale of which the icon will be painted on the
stage, and a 'resource_scale', the scale of the resource used for
painting.
In effect, the texture size will use the scale 'paint_scale * resource_scale'
in a ceiled value while the size of the actor will use 'paint_scale' when
determining the size.
this would load a bigger texture, but the downscaling would keep the visual
quality.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011
Create the surfaces for background shadows at scaled sizes and then draw on them
using logical coordinates, by setting the surface device scale accordingly.
Use the said surface scale when generating the actual shadow cairo pattern
but in such case, to reduce the number of code changes, is better to work in
absolute coordinates, and to do so:
1) Create a temporary shadow-spec copy with scaled values to absolute sizes
2) Invert the scaling on the shadow matrix
3) Do the actual painting in absolute coordinates
4) Set the shadow matrix scaling back to the logical coordinates.
Finally scale down the created shadow pattern surface size when painting it,
applying again a reverse scale to the matrix.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765011https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/5
