Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
In order to replace GTK+'s GtkDirectionType. It's bit-compatible with it,
too. All callers have been updated to use it.
This is a purely accessory change in terms of X11 Display usage cleanup,
but helps see better what is left.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/317
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
Instead of taking care of the PanelMenu.ButtonBox.container
destruction by itself, delegate that to the very object that
created it in the first place: PanelMenu.ButtonBox itself.
When not using arrow notation with anonymous functions, we use Lang.bind()
to bind `this` to named callbacks. However since ES5, this functionality
is already provided by Function.prototype.bind() - in fact, Lang.bind()
itself uses it when no extra arguments are specified. Just use the built-in
function directly where possible, and use arrow notation in the few places
where we pass additional arguments.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/23
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
Since the workarea and margins are both in pysical pixels dimensions (we
fetch margins from Clutter, not from the theme), but the CSS expects
logical (scaled) pixels, unless we consider the scale factor when
setting max-height, it won't work on a HiDpi display.
This fixes missing scrollbars when the calendar popup is full on HiDpi
displays.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753305
Commit 08690d658f generalized the banner-blocking behavior of the
dateMenu to all menus that would obscure the banner. However setting
up the 'open-state-changed' handler only when an indicator is added
does not work for indicators that change their entire menu (like the
app menu) - we currently end up with menus with no connected signal
handler, and throw an error when trying to disconnect an invalid
signal ID.
To address this, add a new PanelButton::menu-set signal and use that
to set up the 'open-state-changed' handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
When opening a panel menu, we set it's max-height to the available
work-area height to keep menus with scrollable content from growing
outside the monitor. However a menu that extends all the way down
to the bottom edge does not look great either, so also take margins
into account here.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744498
The behavior of opening/closing/navigating a menu from its source
actor is generic enough to not limit it to PanelMenu.Buttons, so
move the code into PopupMenu itself.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=735614
No sequence checks are done, these UI elements promptly trigger a grab that
will cancel ongoing touches and redirect later ones somewhere else, so that
works as a barrier to multi-toggling.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733633
There's only two uses of the parameter left, which can easily be added as a
separate line below. Since it's really a private interface meant for the
indicators, make it private as well so external users are less likely to
use it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
To align the arrows, we need to allocate panel buttons the full
height of the tray. Fix up all of the panel buttons to support this,
and align the arrows in the middle.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
Swap out the implementation of SystemIndicator with a dummy,
and build the aggregate menu. At the same time, remove the
poweroff and login screen menus, as those were fake aggregate
menus beforehand.
We lose some flexibility as we lose session-mode-based menu
layout, but as each component of the aggregate menu is supposed
to be "smart" in response to updating itself when session
state changes, I believe it's better than a declarative model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
We can't silently replace the old behavior of separate status
icons into a new system. Replace SystemStatusButton with a new
SystemIndicator class which will allow for the flexibility we
need. For now, make it a subclass of Button so that it mostly
feels the same, but we'll soon be swapping it out with a dummy
implementation that the aggregate menu will use.
I think the code cleanup here is worth it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
A PanelMenuButton added to the top bar might not be visible at all
times. If it is hidden while the corresponding menu is open, we
currently don't do anything at all, e.g. the menu remains open
pointing to an arbitrary location in the top bar.
Instead, close the menu automatically in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703540
Instead of faking it by adding a bunch of main icons and secondary
icons to our own box, try and recreate the original button box
with the original icons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=690589
Panel already forces each item to be a PanelMenu.Button, so it's better
to have the latter handle the bin container too, instead of attaching
a private property that might collide with internal usage by the indicator.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683156
If we don't freeze the presence icon, we can end up in a place where
we'll be updating the icon before we fade out the panel indicators when
coming back from the lock screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683156
