These cause annoying allocation cycle warnings, and it's simpler to
just express our desired layout in terms of nested containers.
Adapt the theme to match as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706843
This commit introduces a new BeginRequestType enum which gets
passed to the 'reset' signal to specify whether
a username should be provided to the begin() method and changes
the loginDialog to comply.
Currently, the signal only ever gets emitted with
AuthPrompt.BeginRequestType.PROVIDE_USERNAME
but that will change in the future when providing smartcard
support.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
We currently emit "failed" any time the UserVerifier is reset,
and user verification didn't succeed prior.
A more conceptually clear time to emit "failed" would be if
the UserVerifier is reset and user verification failed prior,
and to emit "failed" if the user cancels unlock.
This commit restructures things to do that. Aside from being
more conceptually clear, it also lays the groundwork for us
to be able to reset the unlock screen without failing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
There's quite a bit of duplicated code between the login dialog
and the unlock dialog dealing with the various signals from the
ShellUserVerifier.
This commit moves that duplicated code into the AuthPrompt.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704707
commit ea02380c15 made the login
screen stop using ModalDialog. It makes sense for the unlock
code to also stop using ModalDialog, too (for similar reasons).
Now that the login screen's auth prompt code has been separated
out, the unlock dialog can use it to get the buttons and spinners
etc, that it was previously getting from ModalDialog.
This commit drops the ModalDialog usage in the unlock dialog, and
makes the unlock dialog use GdmUtil.AuthPrompt instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702308
Right now when a user types their password to unlock their session
we end up getting an unlock signal from GDM right away. We then
proceed to deactivate the screensaver before the user has a chance
to read his messages.
This commit makes sure we clear out the message queue before processing
the deactivation request.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704347
logind sends out an "unlock" signal separately when
verification completes and we already listen for that,
so we don't need to unlock on verification-complete, too.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704347
For classic mode, we want to use a different styling for the spinner,
so we will pick up the image filename from CSS to make use of mode
specific styling. As the CSS will give us a full pathname, adapt the
API to take a full pathname instead of building it inside AnimatedIcon
from the passed basename.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693688
Right now, if multiple messages come in, they just sort of
clobber each other.
This commit sets up a message queue, and introduces pauses
long enough for the user to hopefully be able to read those
messages.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694688
GDM sends a reset signal after verification succeeds
so that a user-switched login screen can prepare for
the next time it's going to be used.
The unlock screen treats resets as failures, though.
This means, on success, we're emitting "failed" and
clearing any last second messages.
This commit changes the unlock code to ignore resets from
GDM after successful verification.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694688
Right, the common code between the login screen and
the unlock screen handles clearing the user verifier
when GDM sends a reset.
We don't actually always want to clear the messages on
reset in the unlock case, though, so doing it implicitly
is problematic.
This commit moves the clear() call from the common code
to the specific reset handlers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694688
With fallback mode dropped, we can no longer rely on gnome-screensaver
to be installed, so we'll have cases where we are unable to lock the
screen. The user menu should not show the "Lock" item in this case,
but as UnlockDialog includes UserMenu, we cannot use the existing check
without creating a circular dependency; move the function to a more
generic place to fix.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693403
The user widget is the username and avatar shown on
the unlock dialog.
The login dialog has something very similar.
This commit separates the user widget out to its own
file, so we can use it from the login dialog in a
later commit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694062
The screensaver schema has a key that it is meant for locking down
the ability to switch user when the screen is locked, but support
for it was not implemented in the new screenshield.
Fix that by checking the key before creating the button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691042
Commit c3cab28 removed bits setting the password char that was used to
allow typing the password after a failure but before the first question
for the new attempt came.
Without that code, in complex PAM setups you can end up with a visible
password.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687113
We need to do a better job of indicating login process. This can
sometimes take a few seconds (particularly if you get your password
wrong): we need to give better feedback of what's going on.
This adds a spinner next to the login button if the authorization takes
some time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687113
The login dialog had these issues:
- the entry was not really disabled, you could still edit text
- the sensitivity state was not reset on verification failure
- the session list was not disabled
The unlock dialog had these issues:
- "Login as another user..." was not insensitive
- redundant password char setting, overwriting the one given by the
question
The entry insensitive style was also wrong.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687113
The "Sign In" button of the login dialog has its look disabled when the
entry is empty, but it can still be triggered by the Enter key.
This fixes the modal dialog so it does not trigger the action of an
insensitive button, and also means we do not need to connect to the
"activate" signal of the entry anymore.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687113
As we now allow the ctrl-alt-tab popup on the lock screen, it should
be possible to navigate back from the top bar, so add the corresponding
elements to the switcher.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688202
For now we just use it to assign an identifier to modal modes in
which we want to allow some keybindings, but we don't use it for
any actual filtering; we'll start doing this shortly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=688202
You can't login until something has been entered in the password field.
We should therefore make the login button insensitive until you have
entered some text.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687112
When the user has the entered the password for the second time
and clicked OK, clear messages from the previous attempt, so any
new failure is shown clearly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687132
Instead of leaving the login or unlock dialogs in an inconsistent state,
catch DBus errors and show an Authentication Error message. The error
details are logged in the session logs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060
The screenshield requires gdm 3.5, which can be problematic in
jhbuild configurations, or distributions that don't use GDM as the display
manager. Allow transparent fallback to gnome-screensaver in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683060
If the user starts typing right away, assume that the entry is
for a password and don't clear it when the secret request actually
comes. Then, if the user completes typing, we also stash the answer
and send it to GDM right away on the first PAM prompt.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681576
The code here was trying to center the label, but that didn't
happen because we allocated the entire space to the label, which
still plonks it at the top.
Instead of showing a notification, add a small message immediately
below the entry, and give the user two more attempts to login,
before going back to the welcome or lock screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682544
Ensure that all async callbacks check and ignore G_IO_ERROR_CANCELLED.
Ensure that all runs of authentication have their own GCancellable, so
that .begin() can be called multiple times on the same user verifier.
Check for fingerprint reader when beginning authentication, and not
when reset by GDM.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682544
The fingerprint message is useful for users that click their
names in the user list to let them know if fingerprint login
is available.
This same place on screen (below the login entry) can potentially
be used for other messages as well.
This commit changes the variable and style names surrounding
this feature to be more generic.
A subsequent commit will leverage this functionality to provide
a hint on how to log in to the local enterprise domain controller
(if relevant).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681975
The unlock dialog has a mechanism for manually typing in a username
and password. This mechanism is mislabeled:
Login as another user
when it should be labeled
Log in as another user
This commit adds the space.
Spotted by Stef Walter <stefw@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681750
Now that GDM no longer emits auth failures after 25 seconds, we
need to handle inactivity ourselves.
This has also the advantage that it tracks real inactivity, rather
than a timeout from a fixed point in time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=682041
