Currently GNOME Shell doesn't support mnemonics and prompters may
send labels with it.
Remove the mnemonics indicator for now.
Signed-off-by: Stef Walter <stefw@redhat.com>
* Fixed style issue
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750465
And make these only handled on wayland. There's a plethora of issues
around touch passive grab and touch/pointer doubly handling to use
these right away on X11, so we stick to single-touch/pointer there.
This reverts commit 032a688a72.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=750287
Instead of using gnome-settings-daemon's D-Bus interface's presence.
iio-sensor-proxy now offers a D-Bus interface, which will exported
"HasAccelerometer = true" when an accelerometer is present.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749671
Just reuse this gesture rather than implementing edge detection ourselves.
As a plus, we might get touchpad swipe support when Clutter handles it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749742
The menu is clearly associated with a particular window, so keeping
it around when the window is gone doesn't make sense - in case of
the window menu, it is actually harmful as every action will act on
the invalidated window and result in a crash. So just dismiss the
menu when the menu is unmanaged.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749529
When chrome is added with the trackFullscreen parameter, the actor's
visibility will be updated automatically whenever its monitor's
fullscreen state changes. However as we currently ignore the fullscreen
state at the time the chrome is added, the initial visibility may well
be incorrect - fix this by updating the initial visibility as necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749383
Since the introduction of per-source notification policy in commit
098bd4509b, the NotificationPolicy::enable-changed signal has been
used to track the 'enable' setting. However as we never actually
emitted that signal, this never worked without a restart - oops.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749279
If we aren't the active session clutter can't animate and thus we
can't expect the shield to be shown before releasing the suspend
inhibitor so we should release it immediately when becoming inactive.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749228
The whole point of holding a suspend inhibitor is to be able to lock
before suspending.
Currently, when resuming we immediately take the inhibitor without
checking that we're locked which means that we won't be able to
release this inhibitor if we don't unlock at least once.
To prevent that and to better match the inhibitor's intention in the
first place, we can tie the inhibitor with not being locked. In
practice, we also want to let the locking animation finish before
suspending, so we'll tie the inhibitor with not being active
instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749228
This could happen if we are VT switched away and an animated
activation is requested because we're preparing to enter sleep. Since
we don't animate in this case we'd never reach
_completeLockScreenShown() before coming out of sleep, at which point
we _inhibitSuspend() again and would leak the previous inhibitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=749228
Commit 08690d658f generalized the banner-blocking behavior of the
dateMenu to all menus that would obscure the banner. However setting
up the 'open-state-changed' handler only when an indicator is added
does not work for indicators that change their entire menu (like the
app menu) - we currently end up with menus with no connected signal
handler, and throw an error when trying to disconnect an invalid
signal ID.
To address this, add a new PanelButton::menu-set signal and use that
to set up the 'open-state-changed' handler.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
For barriers like the hot corner which are made up of multiple axis
barriers, make sure that all the barriers have been left before
resetting the barrier.
We currently block banners while the time+date menu is open, as it
would obscure the notification. However it is not necessarily the
only menu for which this is the case, so generalize the behavior
to all menus that would overlap banners when open.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
As notifications appear in the time+date dropdown's message list, there's
a strong relationship between notification banners and the menu. However
while the time+date menu is centered by default, which matches the banner
position, its actual position depends on the session mode - in particular
it is moved to the right in classic mode.
Reinforce the relationship in these cases by moving notification banners
underneath the time+date menu.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=745910
According to systemd logind's documentation, the CanSuspend() method
"returns 'na' in case "the operation is not available because hardware,
kernel or drivers do not support it", while "'no' is returned if the
operation is available but the user is not allowed to execute it".
See http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/logind
Thus, we need to return true here when the reply for the CanSuspend
method is neither 'no' nor 'na', or we would providing false positives
in cases where suspension is simply unsupported.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=748338
Unlike entries in the calendar's message list, banners are not subject
to the normal keynav chain, and making the banner actor itself unfocusable
allows for the focus to be moved to the action area when expanded.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747205
The window menu has all those workspace related options, but with multiple
monitors, it is much more interesting to quickly move a window 'over' to the
other monitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633994
