Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
While we've always considered it good style to initialize JS properties,
some code that relies on uninitialized properties having an implicit
value of 'undefined' has slipped in over time. The updated SpiderMonkey
version used by gjs now warns when accessing those properties, so we
should make sure that they are properly initialized to avoid log spam,
even though all warnings addressed here occur in conditionals that
produce the correct result with 'undefined'.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=781471
The user list uses the same indication for hover and focus, so it
is possible for two items to be highlighted at the same time. Using
different styling would improve the situation, but only to some
extent - the user would still need to figure out which highlight
corresponds to which activation method. So instead, copy the
approach we use in popup menus and use a single property for
highlights that is updated by both focus- and hover changes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=772284
Some PAM modules say "Press enter to continue" or
whatever. We need to support them.
This commit allows empty responses to PAM questions,
but still requires a non-empty response for username.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784360
If the user fails to enter their password then hits escape, we
jump back to the user list, then ask again for a password in a
garbled screen. this commit fixes that by skipping a retry if
the operation is cancelled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=784361
If the user fails to enter their password then hits escape, we
jump back to the user list, then ask again for a password in a
garbled screen. this commit fixes that by guarding against the retry
if the fail counter is reset.
We rely on the service to detect whether a fingerprint reader is
present. It is fine to not support fingerprint authentication
when the service is missing, but currently we don't handle this
case at all and end up with a non-functional login screen.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780063
It's weird if after you select a username from the user list, there's
a password already filled in.
This commit disables at that feature for the login screen
(but keeps it in tact for the unlock screen)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766139
When the user gets long failure messages from pam, the authPrompt
message label will clip the message and ellipsize with '…'.
This commit turns off ellipsization from the label, so it will
properly wrap.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764445
If the user clicks Not Listed? to enter ask for username mode, clicks
cancel, and then attempts to log in via the user list, the user will see
"Authentication failed" after correctly typing the password, and then
will become stuck in an empty screen with just the gray noise background.
The problem is, we forgot to disconnect from the signal that's waiting
for the next button to be pressed on the username entry screen. Since
the signal handler that executes here is expecting the username to be
input, and isn't prepared for us to have switched back to user list,
various bad things happen. We try to start two gdm-password
conversations at once, for instance, one using the user's password as
the username. I stopped investigating here, because it's easy to fix by
disconnecting from the signal at the right time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=770328
The Next and Sign In buttons are disabled when the username/password
field is empty. However, the user can still bypass this button by
pressing the enter key, leading to some odd glitches with the log in
for 'Not Listed?' users.
This is easy to fix by simply not progressing to the next screen when
the button is disabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746180
Generally a user-changed operation will be uninteresting, but if the
user is currently in the user list and the account changes to locked, we
want to remove it from the list, or if the user is not in the list and
the account changed to unlocked, we want to add it to the list. This
fixes the case where a new user account created in gnome-control-center
does not appear in the user list. The password mode is set in the new
account immediately after it is created, but the operations are not
atomic, so the login dialog considers the new user account when it is
still locked and rejects it from being displayed, then immediately
afterwards the account is unlocked. This commit causes the login dialog
to show the account when this occurs.
The containsUser() check here is not strictly necessary, but reduces
spurious calls to addUser() and removeUser(), since there's no easy way
to check if the locked status of the account has changed (as it's much
easier to connect to one signal on the UserManager than to
notify::locked on each User object).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=758568
LoginDialog has a private _user, but UserListItem has a public user.
Easy to get wrong since _user would be the right thing to type in 90% of
this file.
We currently will always allocate the user list's preferred size, so it
will grow indefinitely and never scroll; limit the height instead to
get the desired scrolling behavior when necessary.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=754525
When the user successfully types their password, we should hide
the spinner from the button well right away, so it doesn't
consume resources until reset (which may happen significantly later
if the user is vt switched away)
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753891
The code previously tried to stop spinner after it was hidden, but
due to an incorrect check was only stoppig it after it was shown.
Also, it was only stopping after hiding due to an animation, and
failing to stop it in the non-animated case.
This left the spinner hidden and running while VT switched away
from the login screen, only stopping when the auth prompt was
reset when switching back.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753891
We only need the user verifier for the purpose of user verification.
Once it's complete we should clear it so it doesn't get in the way
later.
This fixes a bug introduced in commit 3c8c5a5570 that leads to the
user session crashing when the login screen is reactivated.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753181
We fade out the authentication prompt when a user successfully
logs into a user session. We reset it and fade it back in when
the user switches back to the login screen VT.
The problem is, we only fade it back in if the auth prompt status is
VERIFICATION_SUCCEEDED. It's possible for it to be NOT_VERIFYING
if the authprompt gets reset for some other reason in the interim.
This commit changes the check to be more precise. We now only skip
the fade-in, if we're already faded in, and we only skip the reset if
we're already reset.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753181
The user should be allowed to cancel if verification hasn't
started yet and they're typing in their username. This
commit changes the authPrompt cancel function to not
ignore such requests.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752739
Normally the user isn't allowed to proceed passed
the username question until they've filled it in.
To ensure this, the authprompt code desensitizes
the next button when the number of characters change to
zero.
Unfortunately it fails to desensitize the next button
up front when the entry starts out empty.
This commit addresses that bug.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752739
If the next button ever gets set to Sign In, it won't
get reset to next until the next question asked by pam.
This commit ensures it gets reset to Next when asking
for the username.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752739
We currently only cancel the user verifier on reset if
verifying, but that means we don't properly cancel it when
asking for a username at the Not Listed screen.
The object already handles getting called when there is
nothing to cancel, so just cancel it unconditionally.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=752438
It's possible for a user to type their password so quickly
that GDM hasn't even had time to ask for the password yet,
much less have time to process the answer.
In that situation, we tuck the user response away as
_preemptiveAnswer, and pass it along to GDM when GDM is finally
ready for it.
The problem is, there's a bug in the code, where we send
null for the service name in the answer, instead of the right
service name (say "gdm-password").
This commit addresses the bug by making sure we don't pass the
answer along, until the service name is properly set in
_queryingService. To ensure that, answering query (answerQuery)
based on _preemptiveAnswer has been shifted right below
this._queryingService = serviceName;
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=737586
If the login screen actors aren't placed at pixel
boundaries then they will show up blurred with fuzzy
text.
This commit ensures all actor allocations are floored
to integer coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746912
User read time per character has been changed from 16ms to 48ms because the
message of information about last login is displayed for half a sec that is not
a good user experience. So time to read a character is increased to 48ms from 16ms.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=720885
Currently the menu position below the button means that the menu
can extend to roughly half the screen height before ending up partly
off-screen. This is plenty of space for commonly installed sessions,
but some users have a significantly higher number of sessions in the
list. Move the menu to the side of the button in that case to maximize
the vertical space the menu may take up.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=734352
There's some vestigial code for hiding the user list
that runs at the same time its parent is hidden.
Only the parent should be hidden, at this point, so
there's situations where the user list hides and
never comes back.
This commit fixes that, by deleting the vestigial code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=719418
We currently use the setActiveSession method to both mark a menu item as
selected, and also tell gdm about the current session the user selected.
Since gdm is ultimately in charge of the state, we should decouple this
and simply ask gdm to set the session, and have the menu item reflect
what gdm thinks is the current session.
This prevents state getting mismatched and oscillations from happening,
where we get in a loop of constantly telling gdm what the session is.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740142
If a smartcard is missing from the reader when we start up,
and the system is configured to disable password authentication,
then we need to ask the user to insert their smartcard.
This commit fixes that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740143
The problem is caused by '_askForUsernameAndBeginVerification' being
called multiply times. So when we click 'next', the old connected
function will also be executed.
After the login banner is shown and hidden, the first user
in the user list becomes non-reactive. This is because the
banner is given an opacity of 0, but still allocated.
This commit fixes that by hiding the banner explicitly.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743370
Normally when a user uses the login screen to log in, the
login screen gets killed and the user session takes over
the display.
This doesn't happen for wayland sessions, though. Instead,
the login screen gets reset, and the wayland session is started
on another VT.
The greeter proxy object needs to be recreated after this reset,
since it's associated with state no longer coupled to the login
screen after the reset.
This commit moves greeter proxy creation to happen at reset time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=743371
Frequently banner messages are longer than can reasonable
fit in a one column view, which leads to a smooshed layout.
This commit changes the layout to a two column view, with the
banner on the left and the prompt on the right, if the banner
message is long enough that it can't fit well above the prompt.
If there isn't enough space for two columns then we keep the
one column layout but add scrollbars.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703972
The login screen supports showing a banner message which admins
can use to mention login rules or disclaimers.
This message only shows up currently if the user list is enabled.
Most people who want to show a banner message also want to disable
the user list.
This commit moves the banner message to display when the user is
prompted for login credentials instead of when showing the user
list. It also adds a scrollbar if the message is too long.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703972
The login screen is pretty custom full screen container and the standard
layout managers aren't really a good fit for the kind of layout that's
happening. This will be even more problematic with upcoming changes
to login banners, so we need to switch techniques.
This commit moves login dialog over to using a custom allocate handler
that has specific domain knowledge of the parts of the login screen
and where they go.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703972
If the user list is disabled and the user clicks cancel quickly enough
after typing their username, they can get in a state where the
auth prompt gets stuck in the insensitive state.
This is because the login dialog code makes the prompt insensitive
while while pam is processing the provided username, but the prompt
only makes itself sensitive again when it is hidden.
This commit makes it sensitive right before asking for a username again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740141
Once verification has succeeded, the train's already
left the building and we shouldn't allow canceling.
This commit renders the cancel button non-reactive
and makes the cancel function be a noop after
verification succeeds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740141
Incorrect braces meant that if the ShellUserVerifier was destroyed before
the call to fprintManager.GetDefaultDeviceRemote(), the reply would result in
an error.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=738256
When a user logs in to a wayland session, we keep the login screen
running on the X server with the login screen running in a deactivated mode.
This commit makes sure it get reactivated when the user comes back to
the VT (from user switching, logout or just ctrl-alt-f1).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726989
The smartcard service is put in the foreground in two cases:
1) If password service is disabled by admin configuratoin
2) if a smartcard is inserted
In either case we don't want to ask the user to pick a user from the
userlist. We currently only avoid asking in case 2.
This commit fixes case 1.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726263
We only want to react to the card the user logged in with, at
the unlock screen. We check "at the unlock screen" by checking
the "reauthenticating" state variable. That variable is the
wrong one, though. It gets set too late, and in some cases, gets
set at the login screen, too. We should be checking this._reauthOnly
instead.
This commit fixes that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=726262
Loading the user list can be expensive, for instance when there is
a large number of users and/or their avatars have to be fetched over
the network. In case the user list is disabled anyway, there is no
point in doing that work just to hide it, so stop doing that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=725905
Right now we queue populating the user list in the middle of setting
up the dialog actors. Of course, the actual population happens some time
later after going back to the main loop.
It's more logical to structure the code so the the actors are
instantiated first in one block and then other things after that.
This commit moves the user list population enqueuing operation to the
bottom of the constuctor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721868
In some cases we load the user list after going back
to main loop and in other cases we load the user list
right away (depending on if accounts service is ready).
In the case we load the user list right away we cause a
traceback because loading the user list forces a reset,
which then tries to reset actors which aren't instantiated
yet.
This commit ensures the user list is loaded after the constructor
finishes and the event loop runs irregardless of the accountsservice
state.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721868
When set to fill, the label will always end up left-aligned, which
is only correct in LTR locales. Set the alignment explicitly to
work in both RTL and LTR locales.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=712638
After a user types in their password at the login screen, one
of two things can happen
1) a new session is started
2) an existing session is switched to
In the latter case, GDM sends a reset signal to the login screen,
so it knows to go back to the user list and wait to be summoned
again.
Unfortunately, all reset signals are ignored after verification
success. The reason is because the reset handler was copied from
the unlock dialog as part of a deduplication effort in commit
7e7295f259 and the unlock dialog
handler at the time also emitted a "failed" signal on reset
(which wouldn't make sense to emit after success).
These days "failed" is handled in a different way.
This commit changes the code to let reset signals through after
successful verification.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=710456
oVirt is software for managing medium-to-large scale deployments of
virtual machine guests across multiple hosts. It supports a feature
where users can authenticate with a central server and get
transparently connected to a guest system and then automatically get logged
into that guest to an associated user session.
Guests using old versions of GDM support this single-sign-on capability
by means of a greeter plugin, using the old greeter's extension
API.
This commit adds similar support to the gnome-shell based login screen.
How it works:
* The OVirtCredentialsManager singleton listens for
'org.ovirt.vdsm.Credentials.UserAuthenticated'
D-Bus signal on the system bus from the
'org.ovirt.vdsm.Credentials'
bus name. The service that provides that bus name is called
the oVirt guest agent. It is also responsible for interacting
with the the central server to get user credentials.
* This UserAuthenticated signal passes, as a parameter, the a token
which needs to be passed through to the PAM service that is specifically
set up to integrate with the oVirt authentication architecture.
The singleton object keeps the token internally so it can be queried
later on.
* The OVirtCredentialsManager emits a signal 'user-authenticated' on
it's object once the dbus signal is triggered
* When the 'user-authenticated' signal is emitted, the login screen
tells GDM to start user verification using the PAM service. The
authentication stack of the service includes a PAM module
provided by oVirt that securely retrieves user credentials
from the oVirt guest agent. The PAM module then forwards those
credentials on to other modules in the stack so, e.g.,
the user's gnome keyring can be automatically unlocked.
* In case of the screen shield being visible, it also will react on that
'user-authenticated' signal and lift the shield.
In that case the login screen will check on construction time if
the signal has already been triggered, and a token is available.
If a token is available it will immediately trigger the functionality
as described above.
Signed-off-by: Vinzenz Feenstra <evilissimo@redhat.com>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702162
A conversation is finished after failing, and we are expecting a new
one to be started shortly after. However if we encounter an existing
reference to a previously set _queryingService, we will clear the
password entry, which might already contain a partially typed password
at that point. The behavior does make sense in the case of conflicting
conversations, but in the failure case it is both unexpected and
annoying, so clear _queryingService early to prevent this.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=708186
Right now we only show the session menu button when verifying,
but we should also show it when verification is failed or we
can end up in situation where the session menu disappears during
an authentication retry.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=707064
This commit consolidates the styles of the various
message types into one 'login-dialog-message' style
and then adds additional styles on top to cover the
differences.
This allows us to give the message label an initial
style so that is padded properly before any messages
are displayed.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706670
Right now, we rely on PAM to ask for the username if disable-user-list
is TRUE. This is suboptimal because it means we can't check if we
should show a session menu.
This commit changes disable-user-list==TRUE to ask for a username up
front, rather than have PAM do it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=706607
This commit detects when a user inserts a smartcard,
and then initiates user verification using the gdm-smartcard
PAM service.
Likewise, if a user removes their smartcard, password verification
(or the user list depending on auth mode and configuration) are initiated
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
The duplication makes the function look a lot more complicated
than it actually is.
This commit moves the common code to a new _startService function.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Some pam modules prompt without expecting the user to type
an answer back (e.g. "Please swipe finger"). We need to
emit prompted in this case too, so the the dialog will get shown.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Currently, fingerprint authentication is always a secondary thing.
If a user wants to swipe their finger when the computer is asking
for a password, so be it.
This commit paves the way for making fingerprint auth optionally
be the main way to authenticate. Currently there's no way to enable
this, but in a future commit will honor
enable-password-authentication=false
in gsettings.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Right now, the primary way a user logs in is with
a password. They can also swipe their finger, if their
fingerprint is enrolled, but it's expected the fingerprint
auth service won't ask questions the user has to respond to
by typing. As such, we ignore questions that comes from
anything but the main auth service: gdm-password.
In the future, if a user inserts a smartcard, we'll want
to treat the gdm-smartcard service as the main auth service,
and let any questions from it get to the user.
This commit tries to prepare for that eventuality by storing
the name of the default auth service away in a _defaultService variable
before verification has begun, and then later checking incoming
queries against that service instead of checking against
string 'gdm-password' directly.
Of course, right now, _defaultService is always gdm-password.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
This commit introduces a new BeginRequestType enum which gets
passed to the 'reset' signal to specify whether
a username should be provided to the begin() method and changes
the loginDialog to comply.
Currently, the signal only ever gets emitted with
AuthPrompt.BeginRequestType.PROVIDE_USERNAME
but that will change in the future when providing smartcard
support.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
We currently emit "failed" any time the UserVerifier is reset,
and user verification didn't succeed prior.
A more conceptually clear time to emit "failed" would be if
the UserVerifier is reset and user verification failed prior,
and to emit "failed" if the user cancels unlock.
This commit restructures things to do that. Aside from being
more conceptually clear, it also lays the groundwork for us
to be able to reset the unlock screen without failing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
authPrompt.reset() currently only leaves the authPrompt in a
sane state if the user isn't verifying.
This commit makes sure to cancel verification if a reset happens
while verification is in process.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Swap out the implementation of SystemIndicator with a dummy,
and build the aggregate menu. At the same time, remove the
poweroff and login screen menus, as those were fake aggregate
menus beforehand.
We lose some flexibility as we lose session-mode-based menu
layout, but as each component of the aggregate menu is supposed
to be "smart" in response to updating itself when session
state changes, I believe it's better than a declarative model.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
We can't silently replace the old behavior of separate status
icons into a new system. Replace SystemStatusButton with a new
SystemIndicator class which will allow for the flexibility we
need. For now, make it a subclass of Button so that it mostly
feels the same, but we'll soon be swapping it out with a dummy
implementation that the aggregate menu will use.
I think the code cleanup here is worth it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705845
onAskQuestion has this code:
if (this.verifyingUser)
this.cancelButton.show();
else
this.cancelButton.hide();
but onAskQuestion can only be called when this.verifyingUser is true.
Also, cancelButton is public, and it only ever otherwise gets hidden
from callers.
This commit drops mucking with cancelButton visibility, leaving it
entirely up to the callers to deal with.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
If the first question asked to a user is from the
shell and not from the PAM service (i.e. Username: ),
then we'll save what the user types until PAM asks
a question and then try to send it to PAM.
This commit makes sure the preemptive answer can be used
before the PAM conversation gets started, and makes sure
to discard the preemptive answer if we're not expecting it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705370
Right now we have two booleans that specify when user verification
is happening and when it succeeded, respectively.
This commit consolidates them into one AuthPromptStatus enumeration.
This clean up will allow us to check for verification failure more
easily.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
The only time we ever call _reset directly is when
detecting changes to disable-user-list. We can implicitly
trigger a reset for this case, just as easily by calling
this._authPrompt.reset()
This commit makes that change for consistency and to make
it easier to adjust the authprompt workflow later.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=683437
Right now the whole authPrompt spreads out if a PAM message
comes in that longer than the entry.
This commit changes it to wrap instead, by forcing the
auth prompt to be a fixed width (slightly bigger than
the entry width was sized to previously).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=705037
When a ShellUserVerifier is asked to verify a user at the login
screen it will transparently first try to reauthenticate the user
against an existing session and then fall back to logging a user
into a new session. The former is used for user switching.
It's useful to know which type of verification is happening, so
the next button can be made to say "Unlock" instead of "Sign In" when
a user is already signed in.
This commit exports a new "reauthenticating" property on the
ShellUserVerifier that the auth prompt checks when deciding which
label to use for its next button.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704795
If there are no messages in the queue and a user starts to
type then we can safely hide the message label since the
user has probably already read it.
This fixes a weirdness where "Incorrect Password" messages stay
around, even as the user types in the new correct password.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704817
There's quite a bit of duplicated code between the login dialog
and the unlock dialog dealing with the various signals from the
ShellUserVerifier.
This commit moves that duplicated code into the AuthPrompt.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704707
Right now there is a lot of duplicated code between the unlock
dialog and the login dialog.
This commit moves the login dialog's auth prompt to a separate
class, so that it can (in a subsequent commit) be used by the
unlock dialog.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702308
A bug got introduced when moving the login dialog away from modal
dialog, such that it listens for escape key presses in a mouse
event handler instead of a keyboard event handler.
This commit fixes that code to correctly listen for key-press-event
instead of button-press-event.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702308
Right now if disable-user-list is true we show it briefly, just so
that we can fade it out to the user entry.
This commit avoids the fade in that case.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704471
this._clearMessageQueue() is a noop when this.hasPendingMessages is
false so calling it in that case doesn't make sense.
This commit drops that call.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=704347
Now that we preallocate space for the prompt message there is
a lot of loose space between the entry and the buttons.
This commit helps tighten things up by getting rid
of the large top padding set above the login buttons.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702308
commit ea02380c15 changed the login
dialog to not use ModalDialog anymore. There's still one lingering
setInitialKeyFocus method call in the source, which will cause an
exception to be thrown when users have their user list disabled.
This commit fixes that.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703874
There are some issues with the existing session menu. First, it looks
kinda bad. It seems like it's hanging around there, but it doesn't really know
what to do with itself.
Second, when it expands down it requires that the buttons below move
down with it. This kind of movement is awkward and looks a bit weird.
Third, its current position makes the "dialog" tall and unwieldy when
you add things like messages for fingerprint readers or authentication errors.
This commit moves the session list to a menu behind a button to address
the above problems.
Based on a patch by Jasper St. Pierre.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702818
Right now, there's a weird flicker at start up where the
Not Listed? button shows up before the user list, which looks
pretty bad if you're watching for it.
This commit fixes that problem by hiding the Not Listed button
initially and showing it at the appropriate time.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=703132
The login screen is no longer even remotely dialog-like, so
using ModalDialog is pretty weird. It also makes it difficult
to put the session list in the same place as the spinner.
This commit moves loginDialog away from using modal dialog.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=702818
The optional logo on the login screen is currently shown in the
top bar, which is not only a rather unprominent position, it also
gives the wrong suggestion of a clickable element.
Newer designs call for the logo to be shown horizontally centered
at the bottom of the screen, so implement that instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694912
For classic mode, we want to use a different styling for the spinner,
so we will pick up the image filename from CSS to make use of mode
specific styling. As the CSS will give us a full pathname, adapt the
API to take a full pathname instead of building it inside AnimatedIcon
from the passed basename.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693688
Right now, if multiple messages come in, they just sort of
clobber each other.
This commit sets up a message queue, and introduces pauses
long enough for the user to hopefully be able to read those
messages.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694688
Right, the common code between the login screen and
the unlock screen handles clearing the user verifier
when GDM sends a reset.
We don't actually always want to clear the messages on
reset in the unlock case, though, so doing it implicitly
is problematic.
This commit moves the clear() call from the common code
to the specific reset handlers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=694688
