We currently don't have any code either in gnome-shell or
gnome-shell-extensions setting margins directly with the Clutter API.
On the other hand, the current behavior doesn't allow us to remove a
style class with margins and have that be reflected, so removing this
special casing seems like the right thing to do at this point.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=746902
GTK+ added support for a -gtk-icon-style property in themes to
enforce a particular icon style. Do the same for shell themes
with an -st-icon-style property, with the same set of possible
values as the GTK+ variant:
'requested' - use symbolic or fullcolor icon depending on the
icon name (default)
'regular' - enforce fullcolor icons
'symbolic' - enforce symbolic icons
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=740447
It's implemented similar to the padding property, but instead of taking
into account the margin values at drawing time in node-drawing, we set
the clutter actor margins in StWidget when the style is computed.
In the case that a CSS margin is not specified, we don't to set a value
of 0 to the clutter actor margin. In this manner it allows to use
Clutter margin values set in the code. However, the margins that are set
both in the code and in the CSS on the same side, the result is
unpredictable.
We avoid to set the clutter actor margin values to 0 if there's no CSS
margin values defined, so we still allow clutter actors to use margin
set in the code.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728437
The comment clearly intended that for this to be the case, but a typo
prevented this from actually being done. This fixes the focused state
of the search field not working more than once.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699799
In most cases, we'll transition between two states on hover / focus.
Instead of recalculating and repainting our resources on state change,
simply cache the last state when we transition.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697274
The background image, background image shadow and border image are
allocation-indepedent, so we can keep these in the node. Given that these are
are likely cached in the StTextureCache, the slight increase in code complexity
may not be worth caching these textures and materials -- we might be better off
just computing when we need to paint.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697274
This ensures that two widgets sharing the same theme node won't trample
on each other's prerendered materials if the actors are of different
sizes. This also tries to be very careful to share as much as possible
during a transition.
This has the side effect that if a widget changes state a bunch of times,
we won't cache every state. Since we expect that state changes are
infrequent and that most cases we'll be able to use the texture cache
to do most of the heavy lifting, this cost is much more insignificant
than rendering a number of different actors with the same theme node
and different sizes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697274
Since we now share theme nodes between, we shouldn't cache the paint state
across all nodes. As a first step towards putting this in the actor, split
out the state into another structure. Keep it in the theme node for now
so that we don't make too many changes in one commit.
It's possible that some of these pieces of drawing state could be shared
between theme nodes. For the sake of simplicity, assume that none of them
are shared or should be shared. A future commit could identify those that
could be shared and move them back into the theme node.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697274
Similar to the existing generic getter methods, add lookup functions
for URL properties like the standard background-image/border-image
properties.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693688
As theme nodes keep a cache of matched properties, we need to make
sure to update it when the list of stylesheets changes. In particular
this fixes a regression from commit dc2ec0a8f9, which caused
extensions with stylesheets to crash the shell when re-enabled (for
instances when coming back from the lock screen).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=692994
According to css3-transition, transition-duration is expressed
as a time, that is, in seconds or milliseconds. Fix that by
recognizing numbers with units and implicitly converting to
milliseconds after parsing.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=681376
realpath() does a series of lstat() on each path component to resolve
symbolic links, but we just want to get an absolute path, and we don't
really care if it is physical or not. Going through a GFile does the
canonicalization we need, and is a lot faster.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687881
Because we calculate and cache CSS properties once per StThemeNode,
and only a certain set of attributes can affect the CSS properties,
it's advantageous for as many widgets as possible to share a single
StThemeNode. Similarly, if a widget changes state and then changes back
(e.g. gaining and losing the :hover pseudo-class), it should ideally
get its original StThemeNode back again when it returns to the old
state.
Here, I'm using the StThemeContext as the location for a cache.
StThemeNodes are currently never freed: this seems OK for Shell's usage
(a finite number of IDs, classes, pseudo-classes and types).
Bug: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=687465
Reviewed-by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
Add support for the CSS "background-repeat" property. Currently, this
only supports on/off, rather than allowing tiling in each individual
dimension. It is supported for both the cogl and cairo rendering paths.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=680801
Implement the background-size CSS property, specified by the CSS
Backgrounds and Borders Module Level 3, including the keywords
"contain", "cover", and fixed-size backgrounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=633462
Point the arrow to the center of the sourceActor's content box, rather
than its allocation, in case it has asymmetric padding (as the
rightmost message tray summary item does).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641728
The material of prerendered backgrounds is now painted in the
rectangle determined by st_theme_node_get_paint_box(). As the
ClutterActorBox returned from that function includes the space
needed to draw the box shadow, the background ends up occluding
the shadow.
As the box shadow is not part of the background, factor out a new
helper function which excludes the box shadow, and use it to
prerender and place the background material.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641522
Currently, "-st-shadow" can mean one of three very
different things:
1) shadow based on alpha of the background image
2) shadow the "border box" of the node
3) shadow applied to the content of a StIcon
It isn't well defined which of the above 3 cases
-st-shadow will mean for any given node, however.
This commit splits the property into three
different properties, "box-shadow",
"-st-background-image-shadow", and "icon-shadow"
to make it all very explicit.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=636976
