brl/mutter
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
fd19d33746
mutter/tests
History
Emmanuele Bassi 41e85f3073 introspection-friendly ClutterEvent accessors 
ClutterEvent is not really gobject-introspection friendly because
of the whole discriminated union thing. In particular, if you get
a ClutterEvent in a signal handler, you probably can't access the
event-type-specific fields, and you probably can't call methods
like clutter_key_event_symbol() either, because you can't cast the
ClutterEvent to a ClutterKeyEvent.

The cleanest solution is to turn every accessor into ClutterEvent
methods, accepting a ClutterEvent* and internally checking the event
type.

Fixes bug:

  http://bugzilla.openedhand.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1585
2009-06-08 12:05:20 +01:00
..
conform [tests] Clarify the numbers 2009-06-08 10:59:22 +01:00
data Adds a CoglMaterial abstraction, which includes support for multi-texturing 2008-12-22 16:35:52 +00:00
interactive introspection-friendly ClutterEvent accessors 2009-06-08 12:05:20 +01:00
micro-bench [test-text-perf] Use queue_redraw instead of painting the stage directly 2009-05-28 15:31:05 +01:00
tools [tests/tools] Don't install libdisable-npots.so 2009-02-24 17:04:05 +00:00
.gitignore [gitignore] Ignore two newly introduced tests 2009-03-25 20:58:22 +00:00
Makefile.am 2008-11-17 Emmanuele Bassi <ebassi@linux.intel.com> 2008-11-18 09:50:03 +00:00
README Bug 1162 - Re-works the tests/ to use the glib-2.16 unit testing 2008-11-07 19:32:28 +00:00

README 

Outline of test categories:

The conform/ tests should be non-interactive unit-tests that verify a single feature is behaving as documented. See conform/ADDING_NEW_TESTS for more details.

The micro-bench/ tests should be focused perfomance test, ideally testing a single metric. Please never forget that these tests are synthetec and if you are using them then you understand what metric is being tested. They probably don't reflect any real world application loads and the intention is that you use these tests once you have already determined the crux of your problem and need focused feedback that your changes are indeed improving matters. There is no exit status requirements for these tests, but they should give clear feedback as to their performance. If the framerate is the feedback metric, then the test should forcibly enable FPS debugging.

The interactive/ tests are any tests whos status can not be determined without a user looking at some visual output, or providing some manual input etc. This covers most of the original Clutter tests. Ideally some of these tests will be migrated into the conformance/ directory so they can be used in automated nightly tests.

Other notes:
All tests should ideally include a detailed description in the source explaining exactly what the test is for, how the test was designed to work, and possibly a rationale for the aproach taken for testing.