With some resolutions (such as 4096x2160) we may compute duplicated
scale factors because we used a too wide threshold to check for an
applicable value.
In fact, while when we're at the first and last values it's fine to
search applicable values up to SCALE_FACTORS_STEP, on intermediate ones
we should stop in the middle of it, or we're end up overlapping the
previous scaling value domain.
In the said example in fact we were returning 2.666667 both when
looking to a scaling value close to 2.75 and 3.00 as the upper bound of
2.75 (3.0) was overlapping with the lower bound of 3.0 (2.75).
With the current code, the lower and upper bounds will be instead 2.875.
Adapt test to this, and this allows to also ensure that we're always
returning a sorted and unique list of scales (which is useful as also
g-c-c can ensure that this is true).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
We introduced META_MONITOR_SCALES_CONSTRAINT_NO_FRAC to get global scale
values however, this didn't work properly for some resolutions.
In fact it may happen that for some resolutions (such as 3200x1800) that
we did not compute some odd scaling levels (such as 3.0) but instead
its closest fractional value that allowed to get an integer resolution
(2.98507452 in this case).
Now this is something relevant when using fractional scaling because we
want to ensure that the returned value, when multiplied to the scaled
sizes, will produce an integer resolution, but it's not in global scale
mode where we don't use a scaled framebuffer.
So, take a short path when using no fractional mode and just return all
the applicable values without waste iterations on fractional values.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
Scaling values computation code served us well in the past years but
it's quite delicate and it has some issues in edge cases, so add a test
that verifies that the computed scaling values for all the most common
resolutions (and some that may be common in future) are what we expect
to be.
This may also serve us in future when we'd define a better algorithm to
compute the preferred scale, but this not the day.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1878>
When deriving the global scale from current monitor, we were just checking the
supported value by the primary monitor, without considering weather the current
scale was supported by other monitors.
Resolve this by checking if the picked global scale is valid for all active
monitors, and if it's not the case, use a fallback strategy by just picking the
maximum scale level supported by every head.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/407
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/336>
In Xrandr we were caching the available scaling modes that were computed just
for the current mode, for each monitor, while we can actually reuse the
default implementation, by just passing the proper scaling constraint.
In monitor we need then to properly filter these values, by only accepting
integer scaling factors that would allow to have a minimal logical monitor
size.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/407
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/336>
We only listen to it for 2 settings (drag threshold, double click
time), and we already have the stock ClutterSettings object tracking
the source of these. This code is redundant.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1862>
Seems glGetString(GL_RENDERER) in the wild can return NULL, causing
issues with strstr(). Handle this more gracefully by using
g_return_val_if_fail(), that assumes a NULL renderer means software
rendering.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1931>
This will require some symbol exporting, but the benefit is that have
better control of what external test cases can do in terms of creating
more testing specific contexts.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1861>
