Commit 473e77e2c5 fixed applying the :insensitive pseudo class to
initially unreactive widgets, and adjusted the style test to work
with that.
In hindsight, we can do better than just making the test work, and
include a test case for the :insensitive styling as well (namely
the issue the previous commit was fixing).
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1649>
We are applying the :insensitive pseudo class to unreactive widgets,
or at least we are supposed to. As we currently only update the style
on notify, we don't apply it to initially unreactive widgets.
This was covered up partially until recently when Clutter started to
use G_PARAM_EXPLICIT_NOTIFY. Before that, the notify handler would run
when explicitly setting :reactive to FALSE at construction time.
Make sure we always apply the pseudo class correctly by updating it
after construct properties have been set.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3685
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1648>
We want to use the fast path of filling the entire area if either the
left and right shadows would overlap or the top and bottom shadows. The
latter check was wrong due to a typo resulting in the regular path
being used in some cases it couldn't (and shouldn't) handle.
This was causing the inset shadow used to highlight panel buttons to
not appear for buttons above a certain width.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1646>
The shader code currently only accounts for padding for the
bottom and right fades, but not for top and left.
As a result, we only fade the right edge when swiping through app
picker pages, whoops.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1569>
What the blur shader does is going n_steps in each direction (e.g. in case
we're in the horizontal pass that means left and right direction), sampling
the adjacent texels of the texel we're currently blurring. That means
n_steps actually is the amount of texels we're sampling in one direction,
not in both directions.
Make n_steps match what the blur shader does, and rename it to sampling_radius
to match what it really means. Do that for both st-theme-node-drawing.c and
st-private.c
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1542>
In some styles the top or left sections of box-shadows would go missing
even though they had non-zero thickness. This was because the inner
local coordinates could become very slightly negative and were then
incorrectly judged to be invisible.
Negative coordinates should not be ignored because that's where the
entire top/left sections of shadow are meant to exist. It's only the
sections of shadow with zero thickness that we should skip.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1417>
Not checking for this would result in `clutter_actor_add_child`
failing, but StBin keeping a copy in `priv->child`. So later on,
`st_bin_remove` would never be called on it and this assertion
would fail and crash the whole shell:
```
static void
st_bin_destroy (ClutterActor *actor)
{
StBinPrivate *priv = st_bin_get_instance_private (ST_BIN (actor));
if (priv->child)
clutter_actor_destroy (priv->child);
g_assert (priv->child == NULL);
```
By disallowing spurious `st_bin_set_child` calls we now prevent StBin
from entering such a corrupt state and the above assertion won't fail
anymore.
Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1507>
Just like the internal ClutterText, the icon actors are part of the
entry. It therefore makes sense for the icons to not react to clicks
when the entry itself is non-reactive; again, just like the text.
That behavior is also consistent with icons in GTK entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/3138
Like `GtkAdjustment`, `StAdjustment:changed` is not emitted for the
`value` property except when changed with `st_adjustment_set_values()`.
Note this behaviour in the signal documentation
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/3147
(optional) is only valid for (out) or (inout) parameters (that are
marked as such).
However GError** arguments appear as throws="1" in the GIR anyway
instead of an explicit parameter, so we don't need any annotation
at all here.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1408
Much of St is undocumented, aside from input/output arguments. This is
no doubt because a lot of it parallels Gtk closely, but is worth
improving since many new programmers are not familiar with Gtk.
closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2983
The framebuffer we use for rendering shadows is scaled by the resource
scale, that means we also need to offset coordinates when translating
them to the framebuffers coordinate system.
So far we forgot to do that when translating the framebuffer using the
position of the actor, which lead to small rendering bugs of
text-shadows for actors allocated at non-zero origins. To fix that,
simply multiply those positions with the actors resource scale.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1390
We still load the surface into an StImageContent, but instead of
adding the content to an actor we hand out, return the content
itself (as GIcon).
That means we lose the ability to specify an icon size, but as we
get the pixel data from a fixed-size surface anyway, that shouldn't
matter much in practice.
Not to mention that the function is only used for fallback X11 icons,
which are already shit more often than not.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1342
On the one hand, this is a bit of a stretch: StImageContent is what
we create from GIcons.
But on the other hand, there's some justification: StImageContent does
represent an image (and likely icon) after all, and there's some
precedent with GdkPixbuf.
In the end as we don't care about serialization or loading from other
API, we can go with a very crude implementation that allows us to
pass out a content as GIcon and use it directly when "loading" it.
We will use that soon to represent X11 window icons as GIcons, which
in turn will allow us to unify app icon handling.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1342
ClutterActor provides the same function, but with a different return
value. So since we already switched to the ClutterActor implementation
in our C code, we can now safely remove st_widget_get_resource_scale()
and update the JS code that's still using the old API.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1287
Instead of using the "notify::resource-scale" signal and StWidgets
"resource-scale-changed" signal, use the new "resource-scale-changed"
signal of ClutterActor, which replaces its "resource-scale" property.
Since we'd now have two "resource-scale-changed" signals, one on
ClutterActor and one on StWidget, remove the StWidget one in favour of
the new one.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1287
When scrolled, the container's allocation is smaller than the allocation
of the content. To account for that, commit 2717ca9d08 added the
additional size reported by the layout manager to the content allocation.
However as it did so unconditionally, we now allow children to extend
outside the parent even when *not* scrolled, which breaks any constraints
set on the container (like "width" or "max-height").
Fix this by only extending the child allocation in scrollable dimensions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2491
The performance of the icon grid was being hindered by a large number
of primitives (a few hundred) being copied from the CPU to the GPU on
each frame. This was first noticed in mutter#971 but we failed to
investigate all the issues at the time.
You can also see the high number using `COGL_DEBUG=batching` or
`COGL_DEBUG=disable-texturing`. So now it's obvious that high number is
every letter of every label being uploaded as a separate quad. Let's not
do that and instead treat the whole label as a single quad/texture.
Measured performance on an i7-7700 at UHD 3840x2160:
Journal entries per frame on the icon grid:
* Before: 288 (18 KB copied from CPU to GPU)
* After: 73 ( 4 KB copied from CPU to GPU)
Spring animation:
* Before: 20-30 FPS, avg 22/peak 45 milliseconds per frame
* After: 30-40 FPS, avg 14/peak 28 milliseconds per frame
Scrolling the icon grid:
* Before: 15 FPS, 50 milliseconds per frame
* After: 30 FPS, 28 milliseconds per frame
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1329
As the view now scrolls from right-to-left in RTL locales, the
scroll bar handle should reflect that.
Likewise the event handling needs adjusting as well: Scrolling
left should increase the adjustment value, and clicking the
trough to the left of the handle as well.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/merge_requests/1318
