Commit 9b07ce1d0d changed the OSD window's level bar to be a regular
actor instead of a custom drawn bar. The bar actor's width depends on
both the configured level (e.g. 40%) and the available width, however
the width is currently only updated when the configured level changes.
Fix that by properly considering changes to the parent's width as well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768317
Commit c39ffa111 moved the signal handling from the controls- to the
background-group to enable scrolling on non-primary monitors.
However this broke scrolling on reactive overview elements as the
workspace switcher, as they're not descendants of the background.
To fix, move scroll-event handling to the overview group itself,
which is the common ancestor of all overview elements.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=768316
When we restart, we need to update the struts for the screen before
we enter the main loop, or maximized windows will get resized to the
size of the screen without struts, then resized back.
A workaround is needed for a Clutter bug that occurs when we get
the size of an actor before the first paint of the stage.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=761566
The memory which MetaBackground resides is freed automatically, when its
wrapper object Background is freed by garbage collection. But because the
memory for MetaBackground is huge, changing the background or changing the
background mode repeatedly makes a lot of memory to be in use until garbage
collection runs.
This patch frees the MetaBackground object explicitly when its
MetaBackgroundActor is destroyed which is the moment that the memory in the
object is not used anymore.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766353
Signed-off-by: Hyungwon Hwang <hyungwon.hwang7@gmail.com>
This isn't a performance critical actor and the NVIDIA driver discards
offscreen buffers in some cases which would require us to go through
extra hoops to handle here which isn't worth it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=739178
It is odd to switch workspaces on the primary monitor when panning on
a monitor without workspaces, so reject the gesture on non-primary
monitors when workspaces-only-on-primary is disabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
It is odd to switch workspaces using the scroll wheel when the pointer
is on a monitor without workspaces, so only handle scroll events on
non-primary monitors when workspaces-only-on-primary is disabled.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
We allow activating a workspace by clicking it when we know that
the user did not try to select a window and missed (namely: the
workspace is empty). However we currently always check for an
empty workspace on the primary monitor, which doesn't make sense
when the click happened on a different monitor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
Both the Overview::scroll-event and actions added via addAction()
are meant to work anywhere in the overview, but for now only work
on the primary monitor. Move the handling to the background group
that is known to span all outputs to fix.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
The stack was used to overlay a message indicator over the overview
group. That indicator is long gone, so there's no longer a need for
an intermediate actor in the hierarchy.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
Initializing the upper bound to zero means that on panning we'd start
scrolling from the first workspace even if the current workspace when
entering the overview was different since StAdjustment clamps the
value to be inside bounds.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=766883
If the source actor is destroyed while the popupMenu is shown -- this
can happen if a non favorite application was closing or crashes -- the
menu actor is improperly destroyed.
This makes the popupMenu close first and does a clean ungrab instead.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757556
The various switcher keybindings are handled identically, except for
the popup that is shown; update the code to reflect that instead of
duplicating the code again and again.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730739
The code to handle cycling through windows without showing a popup
was removed from mutter a while ago, which left the corresponding
keybindings mostly broken (i.e. they now only switch between two
windows). With the various switch-foo keybindings handled by the
shell, it is now easier to take over the cycle-foo keybindings as
well.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=730739
Logind recently got support for a hint property in Session Object to
inform if session is Locked or not. It is up to desktop environments
to keep this property up to date.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=764773
If the drag actor is destroyed before the animation
callback is called, the callback is never called and
we're sticked with dnd grabing the events after we
dropped the target.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=757676
We currently show the orientation lock button when an accelerometer
is present, however gnome-settings-daemon's xrandr plugin only applies
rotation when a builtin monitor is present. Update the button's
visibility to match gnome-settings-daemon.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=765267
ClutterLayoutManager's size request methods have an additional container
argument before the for-width/height parameters compared to ClutterActor.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=763068
While a channel has pending messages, it will pop up again when
dismissed. That is clearly not what users expect, so clear them
out first before closing a channel.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=747991
Let's make it really simple and ask user interactively, once. This
simplifies things for:
* Privacy panel of gnome-control-center as it doesn't have to filter
applications.
* Apps: If they are denied access, they can simply point users to
privacy panel of gnome-control-center since they can be sure location
access for the app can be enabled in there.
Also it's less annoying to user. Before this patch, if they denied
access to application, they had to keep doing that at least each time
they launched the application.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762559
Alex told me that since it's not geoclue but rather GNOME-components
storing/accessing app permissions, it's better if we put it under
'gnome' rather than generic 'desktop' table.
Now that we no longer skip dimming/undimming windows while showing
the overview, we can still save a bit of work by changing the dimming
without animation while the window is hidden.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762475
We skip window animations while the overview is shown (and the window
group is hidden) to avoid unnecessary work. However when an attached
modal dialog is opened or closed, this involves checking whether the
parent window should be dimmed - skipping that test means that we can
simply fail to dim or undim a window altogether, so do that check
unconditionally.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762475
While we could have implemented this already a while ago, this would
have been a completely false security mechanism since we had no way of
reliably identifying applications. Since now with xdg-app, we can at least
reliably identify bundled applications, let's give users a choice of
which applications in particular they are OK with giving location data
to.
While we still can't reliably identify system (non-xdg-app) applications,
it seems extremely unlikely we'll ever be able to do that (at least not
in the near future) so we'll have to trust them to not lie about their
IDs.
Next release of geoclue will take the ID of bundled application directly
from corresponding xdg-app metadata so bundled applications can't simply
lie about their IDs.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762119
This class will be responsible for authorizing applications that try to
access location information. Since this is mainly targetted for xdg-app
applications, we make use of xdg-app's D-Bus API to store
per-application authorization.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762119
Add a dialog that is used in a following patch, to ask user if they want
a requesting application to gain access to their location.
Co-author: Florian Müllner <fmuellner@gnome.org>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=762119
