The inconsistent styling rules "some card styles are nested, but some
are not" and "some card styles are nested, but some of their descendant
styles are defined elsewhere" are very confusing.
This commit stops nesting all card styles to make the coding style
consistent and less confusing.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/957
- Remove bottom blank space on the right column of the calendar popover
so that the weather card is bottom-aligned with the clear button on
the left column.
- Remove top blank space on the left column of the calendar popover so
that the message list is top-aligned with the today button on the
right column.
- Adjust .message-list-controls sizing to align with other card-styled
elements.
- Use regular `spacing` instead of margin for some spacing.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2088
Closes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2120
- Use fewer properties for layout.
- Use .message-body instead of .message-content to change the body
color, and remove some color overrides.
- Fix border-radius for last .message-media-control, not only on hover.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/957
- Remove margin-bottom for StIcon, which is not only ineffective, but
also created a bug in app folders.
- Remove ">" which is invalid for overview icons that are not app
folders.
- Apply spacing to the correct target "StBoxLayout", not the parent
.overview-icon.overview-icon-with-label.
Fixes https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2129
The used_scales hash table uses g_double_hash and g_double_equal which
try to read a double from the passed pointers. The pointers however were
pointing to a float, leading to an invalid read.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/974
The portal helper is rather sensitive because potentially-hostile Wi-Fi
networks can decide to launch it whenever they want (by blocking the
user's connection to the nmcheck domain) and load whatever web content
they want into it. So having this unsandboxed is really extraordinarily
risky. Previously it was a risk we had to accept, because WebKit did not
have a web process sandbox, but now it does. So let's bubblewrap all the
things!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/983
- the plan was to drop the frequent/all view switcher, thus sam didn't
pay too much attention to the button styling for those. Sadly the view
switcher remains, so we should keep the old subtle styling intact.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/979
Commit 147a743d8d moved the suspend and power-off actions into
the submenu that contains the log-out and switch-user actions,
but did not update the submenu visibility logic to account for
the additional actions.
As a result, the submenu is hidden when log-out and switch-user
are unavailable (like on the login screen), even if suspend and
power-off are enabled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2169
While gnome-shell will now check for extension updates, the checks
are performed infrequently. Opening the Extensions app implies that
the user's current focus is on extensions, so it is an appropriate
time to schedule another updates check.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we can download, apply and display extension updates, it is time
to actually check for updates. Schedule an update check right on startup,
then every 24 hours.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we have support for extension updates in the shell, we
need some place to display the updates to the user.
As we are establishing the Extensions app as the primary way for
managing extensions, it's a natural place for that functionality.
Show which extensions have updates available, and offer a log out
button (so gnome-shell can apply the updates when logging back in).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Until now, it didn't matter whether an extension was installed in the
user's home or system-wide. However with support for uninstallation,
there is now a significant different, as that action is only available
for user extensions.
Account for that by separating extensions by type, so that users don't
have to second-guess which extensions can be fully-managed and which
appear as part of the system.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The newly added expander gives us a place where we can display
more details without cluttering the interface.
Take advantage of that by including the extension website, version
and author.
(Author is in the mockups, but will not actually be shown until
the extensions website is changed to include it in its metadata;
however best to have UI and string in place for the freezes)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The description can be useful information, but also increases the
visual complexity of the extensions list. Move it into a hidden
details area that can be expanded, which unclutters the interface
while keeping the information readily available.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The current fixed two-line label requires a custom widget, which
make moving to a widget template harder.
As the description will soon move elsewhere anyway, just go back
to a single line with a standard label for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Extensions can have a major impact on stability and performance. Now that
the tool will become the main way for users to manage their extensions, it
is an appropriate place to warn the user of that risk.
Add a small info popover to the headerbar to display that warning, together
with the previously removed hint of where to go for finding new extensions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
