We want the spinner to be centered with regard to the entry, but
constraining the height breaks that:
1. clutter_actor_allocate() is called with the available size
2. clutter_actor_update_constraints() then adjusts that according
to the constraints
3. clutter_actor_adjust_allocation() applies the margin/expand/align
properties.
The issue there is that 2. reduces the allocation to the desired size,
so there is no more extra space to distribute in 3.
We can fix this by either constraining everything (and rely on the
cancel button's alignment) or limit the constraint to the width. The
latter seems more appropriate, given that the constraint is only used
to center the entry horizontally.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2628
(cherry picked from commit b191e9ef91)
Commit 55b57421d changed signal handlers to the corresponding vfuncs,
but didn't always chain up as necessary. In most places this doesn't
matter, but at the very least the commit broke activating message list
items via the keyboard.
Add all (hopefully) the missing chain-ups to get the expected behavior
back.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/-/issues/2319
We turned both the auth prompt's cancel button and the switch user
button into icon buttons now, which means they are completely cryptic
when using a screen reader.
Just use the previously used labels as accessible names, which has the
nice side effect of lowering the impact of the string freeze break.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
The button is hidden on the lock screen, so it shouldn't be allowed to
activate it, be it via click or keyboard. The latter is still possible
by keynaving to the button and hitting space/enter. Fix that by making
the button unfocusable when we make it unreactive.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2210
We don't want to show a caps-lock warning when showing a non-password
entry, but we also don't want the layout to jump when changing the
label's visibility.
Achieve that by inserting an empty placeholder label that we can
show whenever the caps-lock warning is hidden.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2215
Usually, logging in or unlocking the session is made asynchronously,
and AuthPrompt properly manages which entry is currently visible.
External code don't rely on any specific entry to be set, since it
is AuthPrompt's responsibility to select the correct one to be shown.
However, there's one specific case where AuthPrompt must preserve
the password entry: on reset. The reset code preserved whatever
entry was currently displayed, but after fe69dacaf1, it always
changes to the username entry.
Make sure to show the password entry on reset.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/999
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
If username-based login flow is followed, we need a default avatar
for the userWidget. Hence, check if the user passed to userWidget
is (null) which implies a username-based login flow.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Allow vertical orientation for the userWidget so that the user-avatar
can be centered and user's name can be placed below it. The plan
for 3.36 is to use this vertical userWidget layout for both lock
and login screen.
The userWidget is also used while creating the user-selection list
at the login, hence we still need to keep the horizontal layout
for userWidget in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Since the wiggle effect will be used by the redesigned prompt-dialogs
and we always want to use the same parameters, move those as defaults
for the wiggle function to the util.js file.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/942
Use the new StPasswordEntry for password entry fields
and remove all direct handling of clutter text of the entry
via clutter_text_set_password_char to show/hide the password
text. StPasswordEntry will provides a peek-password-icon which
will allow to show/hide the password present in the field to
the user in subsequent commits.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/619
Since ES5, trailing commas in arrays and object literals are valid.
We generally haven't used them so far, but they are actually a good
idea, as they make additions and removals in diffs much cleaner.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
ES6 allows to omit property names where they match the name of the
assigned variable, which makes code less redunant and thus cleaner.
We will soon enforce that in our eslint rules, so make sure we use
the shorthand wherever possible.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/805
Every since commit aa394754, StBoxLayout has supported ClutterActor's
expand/align properties in addition to the container-specific child
properties. Given that that's the only container left with a special
child meta, it's time to fully embrace the generic properties (and
eventually remove the child meta).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/780
Remove the `this.actor = ...` and `this.actor._delegate = this` patterns in most
of classes, by inheriting all the actor container classes.
Uses interfaces when needed for making sure that multiple classes will implement
some required methods or to avoid redefining the same code multiple times.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/559
We now have everything in place to replace Tweener for all animatable
properties with implicit animations, which has the following benefits:
- they run entirely in C, while Tweener requires context switches
to JS each frame
- they are more reliable, as Tweener only detects when an animation
is overwritten with another Tween, while Clutter considers any
property change
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/22
The different units - seconds for Tweener and milliseconds for
timeouts - are not a big issue currently, as there is little
overlap. However this will change when we start using Clutter's
own animation framework (which uses milliseconds as well), in
particular where constants are shared between modules.
In order to prepare for the transition, define all animation times
as milliseconds and adjust them when passing them to Tweener.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/663
Braces are optional for single-line arrow functions, but there's a
subtle difference:
Without braces, the expression is implicitly used as return value; with
braces, the function returns nothing unless there's an explicit return.
We currently reflect that in our style by only omitting braces when the
function is expected to have a return value, but that's not very obvious,
not an important differentiation to make, and not easy to express in an
automatic rule.
So just omit braces consistently as mandated by gjs' coding style.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
