We share this actor with other shell menus, which arguably track a different
"cursor" as we care of the caret/anchor text positions, and menus care about
pointer click coordinates.
Use a standalone actor for this, so popups/IM are entirely decoupled.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1571
Those unused arguments aren't bugs - unbeknownst to eslint, they all
correspond to valid signal parameters - but they don't contribute
anything to clarity, so just remove them anyway.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/627
While we have some style inconsistencies - mostly regarding split lines,
i.e. aligning to the first arguments vs. a four-space indent - there are
a couple of places where the spacing is simply wrong. Fix those.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/608
We are currently inconsistent with whether or not to put a space
after catch clauses. While the predominant style is to omit it,
that's inconsistent with the style we use for any other statement.
There's not really a good reason to stick with it, so switch to
the style gjs/eslint default to.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/607
Most often it is a bug if the condition part of a for-loop contains the
assignment operator rather than the comparison one, so tools rightfully
emit a warning.
Clarify that the assignment is intentional in this case by adding
parentheses.
Spotted by eslint.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/375
ES6 finally adds standard class syntax to the language, so we can
replace our custom Lang.Class framework with the new syntax. Any
classes that inherit from GObject will need special treatment,
so limit the port to regular javascript classes for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/361
Pretty much like dd4709bb2, BoxPointer's show() and hide()
functions will clash with Clutter.Actor's ones.
In addition to that, on a conceptual level, the current API
is not great, because calling boxPointer.hide() won't result
in boxPointer.actor.visible == false.
For these reasons, rename show() and hide() to open() and
close(). A compatibility layer will be added in a following
commit, warning about the usage of show() and hide().
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/153
Any symbols (including class properties) that should be visible
outside the module it's defined in need to be defined as global.
For now gjs still allows the access for 'const', but get rid of
the warnings spill now by changing it.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785084
Only recent IBus versions have support for this signal
which is used for wayland clients. In order to work
with older IBus versions we can silently ignore the
signal's absence.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753476
IBus now provides a new method for cursor positioning where the
coordinates are relative to the focused window. This is useful for
wayland clients which don't have access to their global coordinates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=753476
Right now we have three "dummy cursor" widgets between the background
menu, the message tray menu, and the IBus candidate popup. Consolidate
these into one "dummy cursor" widget which is tracked in the layout
manager.
After moving the dummy source actor, we still have to poke the
boxpointer so that it gets repositioned.
This has always been broken but went unnoticed until now since none of
the commonly used engines currently depend on this method. Thanks to
Mathieu Bridon for pointing it out.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691902
setCandidates() has too many arguments and setting the orientation
isn't particularly related with it. It might also be useful to switch
orientation without changing the candidates.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691902
Make it look more like the mockups.
In order to do that we stop using PopupMenu and friends as it doesn't
really buy us anything and just makes it more cumbersome to add the
style classes we need.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691902
