Clicking or typing to reveal the auth prompt are good options for
mouse/keyboard workflows, but awkward on touch devices. Now that
we have SwipeTracker, adding corresponding gestures support is
easy, so do just that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
The current transition between clock and auth prompt uses a simple
crossfade.
"What kind of spatial model is that?!"
T.B.
Root the transition a bit more by adding translation and scale to
the animation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/972
Hiding the Caps lock warning label changes the layout of
Auth Prompt. This is specially noticeable when logging in
with unlisted users, where we change the visibility of this
label after typing a username, and the whole user widget
moves a bit.
Change the Cap lock label's opacity instead of hiding it.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, when a null user is passed, we don't add any
username label. That makes the layout of user and no-user
cases inconsistent.
Add a ghost label with no opacity to mimic the username
label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, AuthPrompt is connecting to its own 'next' signal
signal to react to any of the entries being activated, and do
some actions like starting the spinner and answering the PAM
question.
Refactor this code into another method, and don't connect to
our own signal.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Unfortunately, the question that is displayed comes directly
from PAM. It usually is just "Password:", which comes from
pam-unix, but other questions can be set, usually with the
colons, since they are crafted with a CLI workflow in mind.
Manually drop the colons from questions asked by PAM. This
is also done by the PolKit agent, which shows how the stack
is fragile, but it's what we have for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
This is a regression from the transition to password entry. Both
entries need to be connected to the relevant signals, otherwise
username-based login won't ever work.
Connect both the text and the password entries.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Currently, there is a dedicated label above the entry to
display the question text. According to the new mockups
for the lock screen, this label doesn't exist; instead,
the question is set inside the entry itself, as a hint
text.
Set the questions as hint texts of the entry, and remove
the now unused label.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
If username-based login flow is followed, we need a default avatar
for the userWidget. Hence, check if the user passed to userWidget
is (null) which implies a username-based login flow.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Allow vertical orientation for the userWidget so that the user-avatar
can be centered and user's name can be placed below it. The plan
for 3.36 is to use this vertical userWidget layout for both lock
and login screen.
The userWidget is also used while creating the user-selection list
at the login, hence we still need to keep the horizontal layout
for userWidget in place.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/922
Since the blur sigma decides how many pixels get factored in when
blurring and setting a scale factor increases the background texture by
that factor, the sigma value should also be multiplied by the scale
factor.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/991
There is nothing else to be focused in the lock screen itself -- the
top bar is already handled elsewhere, and the dialog manages itself
now.
Remove the lock screen group from the Ctrl-Alt-Tab manager.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
AuthPrompt is the set of actors that contain the user avatar,
the username, and the password entry. With the removal of the
screen shield, the unlock dialog (be it UnlockDialog or the
LoginDialog) is always created, and in the case of UnlockDialog,
so is the auth prompt.
This is problematic, though, since for passwordless accounts,
the simple act of creating AuthPrompt authenticates the user,
and lifts the lock screen.
Create the AuthPrompt on demand in UnlockDialog.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
As per the latest lock screen mockups, critical notifications must have
a more prominent, solid color.
Add a .critical style class to critical notification bubbles, and make
them darker.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Now that the screen shield is gone (at least, as it used to
be), the corresponding session mode is not necessary anymore
as well.
Remove the 'lock-screen' session mode, and the corresponding
CSS.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Pretty much what the commit title says.
This gives the lock shield actor another role: instead of
being the interactive screen shield, make it the invisible
actor that prevents interacting with windows while the
unlock dialog is sliding down.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
Activating a dialog is slightly different from opening it; the
former is about showing the user authentication widgetry, while
the latter is about creating it and pre-allocating the necessary
resources.
Activate the screen shield dialog when necessary.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The 'onPrimary' argument was being passed to dialog.open(). Turns out,
neither UnlockDialog nor LoginDialog use this parameter.
Remove the unnecessary 'onPrimary' parameter, and cleanup the related
code.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/872
The use of the core idle monitor means that focus change events
are also delayed by keyboard interaction. Since the magnifier is
already in the business of pointer tracking, it's easy enough to
fire the pointer rest timeout from here, so focus changes are
accumulated and delayed.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
We may get several a11y events setting the caret on the same
coordinates it previously was. Make focus tracking ignore those,
as we're jumping to the same coordinates again during eg. mouse
operation.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the crosshair is clipped so it doesn't cover the pointer cursor,
the clip rectangle is skewed towards the bottom/right. This was
made so to accomodate the default pointer, but the unevenness stays
on other pointer cursors, and it makes the crosshair look odd on
short crosshair length.
Make all lines clip to an even distance from the center instead.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
It is somewhat unexpected that crosshair color and pointer cursor colors
remain the same across changes in color inversion settings, and may lead
to contrast issues. Apply the effect on the common container, so it
applies to these all.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/984
If the icon proper has opacity of zero then that's probably because a
clone of it is animating. So avoid animating the source actor too.
And if there's any other reason for the opacity being zero, still don't
animate it because we can't see it :)
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2167
So as to guarantee the unmapped state sticks and doesn't get toggled
back to mapped before we return.
Being in a mapped state when `FolderIcon.vfunc_unmap()` returned was
causing an assertion failure in `clutter_actor_set_mapped` and crashed
the shell.
Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2170
The portal helper is rather sensitive because potentially-hostile Wi-Fi
networks can decide to launch it whenever they want (by blocking the
user's connection to the nmcheck domain) and load whatever web content
they want into it. So having this unsandboxed is really extraordinarily
risky. Previously it was a risk we had to accept, because WebKit did not
have a web process sandbox, but now it does. So let's bubblewrap all the
things!
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/merge_requests/983
Commit 147a743d8d moved the suspend and power-off actions into
the submenu that contains the log-out and switch-user actions,
but did not update the submenu visibility logic to account for
the additional actions.
As a result, the submenu is hidden when log-out and switch-user
are unavailable (like on the login screen), even if suspend and
power-off are enabled.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/2169
While gnome-shell will now check for extension updates, the checks
are performed infrequently. Opening the Extensions app implies that
the user's current focus is on extensions, so it is an appropriate
time to schedule another updates check.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we can download, apply and display extension updates, it is time
to actually check for updates. Schedule an update check right on startup,
then every 24 hours.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Now that we have support for extension updates in the shell, we
need some place to display the updates to the user.
As we are establishing the Extensions app as the primary way for
managing extensions, it's a natural place for that functionality.
Show which extensions have updates available, and offer a log out
button (so gnome-shell can apply the updates when logging back in).
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Until now, it didn't matter whether an extension was installed in the
user's home or system-wide. However with support for uninstallation,
there is now a significant different, as that action is only available
for user extensions.
Account for that by separating extensions by type, so that users don't
have to second-guess which extensions can be fully-managed and which
appear as part of the system.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The newly added expander gives us a place where we can display
more details without cluttering the interface.
Take advantage of that by including the extension website, version
and author.
(Author is in the mockups, but will not actually be shown until
the extensions website is changed to include it in its metadata;
however best to have UI and string in place for the freezes)
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The description can be useful information, but also increases the
visual complexity of the extensions list. Move it into a hidden
details area that can be expanded, which unclutters the interface
while keeping the information readily available.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
The current fixed two-line label requires a custom widget, which
make moving to a widget template harder.
As the description will soon move elsewhere anyway, just go back
to a single line with a standard label for now.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Extensions can have a major impact on stability and performance. Now that
the tool will become the main way for users to manage their extensions, it
is an appropriate place to warn the user of that risk.
Add a small info popover to the headerbar to display that warning, together
with the previously removed hint of where to go for finding new extensions.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
Currently when the extensions list is scrolled, it is possible to
keynav out of view, as the scrolling doesn't follow the key focus.
Hook up the adjustment to fix that.
https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/gnome-shell/issues/1968
