The ::stopped signal is emitted when the timeline has been completely
exhausted or when the timeline has been programmatically stopped by
using clutter_timeline_stop(); the notification at the end of the
timeline run allows to write handlers without having to check whether
the current repeat is the last one, like we are forced to do when using
the ::completed signal.
Based on the patch by: Jasper St. Pierre <jstpierre@mecheye.net>
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676854
Ensure that resizing transitions smoothly when switching between major
axis; the allocation aspect ratio is not important: it's the size of the
allocation that dictates the major axis.
The property uses an array with the following CSS style syntax
[ top, right, bottom, left ] or
[ top, left/right, bottom ] or
[ top/bottom, left/right ] or
[ top/right/bottom/left ]
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=676367
When asking for the preferred width and height of an actor, in case
only one of either the minimum or the natural width is set, the margin
offsets should also be applied.
The example code that is meant to be XIncluded into the API reference
should not be part of the interactive test suite: it's code that it is
meant to be used as a reference implementation - whereas the interactive
test suite should be allowed to be lean and test behaviour even in nasty
ways. In short: the test suite should not be the place where we show off
idiomatic code for educational purposes.
The introspection scanner has become slightly more annoying, in the hope
that people start fixing their annotations. As it turns out, it was the
right move.
Calling clutter_actor_allocate() should transition between the current
allocation and the new allocation, by using the defined implementation
of the easing state.
This means that:
clutter_actor_save_easing_state (actor);
clutter_actor_allocate (actor, &new_alloc, flags);
clutter_actor_restore_easing_state (actor);
will cause "actor" to transition between the current allocation and the
desired new allocation.
The trick is to ensure that this happens without invalidating the
entire actor tree, but only the portion of the tree that has the
transitioned actor as the local root. For this reason, we just call the
allocate() implementation from within the transition frame advancement,
without invalidating flags: the actor, after all, *has* a valid
allocation for the duration of the transition.
The :x-expand and :y-expand flags on ClutterActor are used to signal
that an actor should expand horizontally and/or vertically - i.e. that
its parent's layout management policy should try to assign extra space
to the actor when allocating it.
The expand flags are automatic: when set on a leaf node in the actor
tree, they will bubble up through the parent and grandparents up to the
top level actor; during allocation, the actors with children will lazily
compute whether their children needs to expand.
Using a compound type property for position and size has various
advantages: it reduces the amount of checks; it reduces the amount
of notify signals to connect to; it reduces the amount of transitions
generated.
This commit adds a further conditional check for calling
clutter_actor_show() when adding a child to an actor. We cannot
unconditionally change the value of the show-on-set-parent property like
the original solution of commit 81b19a78f5
as that breaks the document invariant that show-on-set-parent will be
changed iff an actor is without a parent.
The new ADD_CHILD_SHOW_ON_SET_PARENT flag is part of the default and
legacy flags, thus retaining the default behaviour when adding a child;
the flag is not passed when reordering the list of children, which means
we ignore the state of the show-on-set-parent property.
The conformance test suite fully passes, including the newly added test
to verify that changing the paint order does not trigger visibility.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=674510
This reverts commit 81b19a78f5.
The commit breaks the conformance test unit for the invariants we
guarantee for the 1.x API:
ERROR:actor-invariants.c:307:actor_show_on_set_parent: assertion failed: (show_on_set_parent)
It's been a year and change, and two stable releases, since we
introduced the paint volume mechanism to allow actors to paint outside
their allocation safely in environments that support clipped redraws.
The time has come to flip the switch, and return a valid paint volume,
matching the actor's allocation, by default - at least for Actor
instances from classes that do not override paint() and
get_paint_volume().
If an actor has a paint signal handler then it's the user responsability
not to paint outside the allocation - and to suffer the consequences of
doing so; in an ideal world, paint() would not be a signal in the first
place anyway. Plus, the idea that painting can happen at any time and
still have a valid surface greatly conflicts with the design goal of
making Clutter's rendering operations fully retained into a render tree.
We can still revert this commit before spinning 1.12, if need be.
When removing the last Action, Constraint, or Effect, we should also be
clearing the corresponding MetaGroup: code inside ClutterActor relies on
NULL checks, and changing them all to check for NULL && n_items == 0
would not be fun.
We need to remove the transition only if the current repeat is equal to
the number of repeats, and if the transition was marked as remove on
complete. Otherwise, the transition has to remain where it is.
The opacity internal setter will do it for us, and it will take into
consideration any eventual flatten effect applied to the actor.
This unbreaks the actor-offscreen-redirect conformance test.
We were using g_list_foreach() prior to the first Apocalypse, and that
function is resilient against changes to the list while iterating it;
since we are not using a GList any more, we need handle this case
ourselves.
When the easing state has a duration of zero milliseconds we can skip
the entire create_transition() call inside set_width() and set_height(),
to avoid what may be a costly call to get_preferred_*.
If we update a transition that is currently playing, we need to check
the current easing state, and look at the eventual duration, in case
the user wants to cancel the transition.
Instead of checking the duration of the current easing state we should
check if there's a transition in progress, and update it
unconditionally.
If there is no easing state, or the easing state has a duration of zero
milliseconds, then create_transition() should bail out early and set the
requested final state.
This allows us to write:
clutter_actor_save_easing_state (actor);
clutter_actor_set_x (actor, 200);
clutter_actor_restore_easing_state (actor);
[...]
clutter_actor_set_x (actor, 100);
and have the second set_x() update the easing in progress, instead of
being ignored.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=672945
Commit 80626e7584 removed an
IN_DESTRUCTION check from within the add_child_internal() method,
outlining an option for bringing it back. It was too late for the 1.10
cycle to do it, and eventually pick up the pieces, but now that we're
at the beginning of the 1.11 cycle we can restore it, and add checks
elsewhere to balance it.
Should not have been there in the first place: the animatable will be
set either using ClutterTransition API, or when adding the transition
to a ClutterActor.
When adding a transition to a ClutterActor, the actor should hold a
reference on it, and release it only when we remove it. This makes
transitions just like other objects held by ClutterActor.
While you can get a per-transition notification of completion, it can be
convenient to also have a way to notify that all the transitions
involving an actor are complete. A simple signal triggered by the
removal of the last transition fits the bill pretty neatly.
If restore_easing_state() is called on the last easing state on the
stack, clean up the stack, so that we don't leave stale pointers
around to later segfault on.
When setting the easing mode, duration, or delay without having ever
called clutter_actor_save_easing_state(). It's confusing, and not
really nice.
In the future, we'll have a default easing state implicitly created by
the actor itself, but for the time being explicitly opting in is
preferrable.
