The order and way include macros were structured was chaotic, with no
real common thread between files. Try to tidy up the mess with some
common scheme, to make things look less messy.
We currently don't handle NULLs on these correctly, yet they can be
so when running nested. Just refrain from sending those wp_tablet(_pad)
events in that case.
And remove the wayland-specific handling. This works for both Wayland and
X11 (provided the compositor receives pad events through a passive grab
there).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=773779
We must lookup the mode switch serial for the group where the button
belongs to. Also, avoid the changes if the client requests setting
the feedback for buttons owned by the compositor.
We assumed that each group could only have 1 strip and/or ring, because
accounting is performed per group, so we could not assume the real
index for anything above 1. Get rid of this restriction, now that
MetaWaylandTabletPad does its own accounting of rings/strips, alongside
groups.
This is best for 2 reasons:
- It's feels cleaner doing first creation of rings/strips and then
the group assignment. The other option is making groups iterate
other all rings/strips and selectively skip those not meant for
it, which sounds somewhat redundant.
- Some minimal accounting of rings/strips without group restrictions
is needed for meta_wayland_tablet_pad_get_label().
The rings/strips memory is now owned by MetaWaylandTabletPad instead
of groups, which is sort of meaningless since all are meant to go
at the same time.
All pads will share the same focus than the keyboard, so this means that:
- The focus changes in-sync for keyboard and all pad devices, and
- Newly plugged pads will be immediately focused on that same surface
This object represents the collection of buttons, strips and rings
in a tablet pad. All the objects created (pad, strips and rings)
share a common focus surface and have the same lifetime.
