If we have a focused surface, we need to eat up key events, not
just if we have a non-empty focus resource list. The latter would
happen if we have a focused client but it never called get_keyboard.
The latest Xorg / Xwayland has support for -displayfd being used
in conjunction with an explicit display number. Use that to know
when the X server is ready, rather than UNIX signals, because
they're UNIX signals.
We track changes to windows fullscreen state and stacking order
to determine a monitor's in-fullscreen state, but missed the
obvious case of moving a fullscreen window between monitors.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728395
Commit 585fdd781c not only removed the tabpopup, but set invalid
handlers (a.k.a. NULL) for those shortcuts; add back handling of
basic handling of those shortcuts by switching instantly without any
popups.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728423
If we're sending out a configure event, we can't immediately move the
window; we need to instead wait to apply the new position when the
client sends a new buffer.
dx/dy should be against the regular window's rect, and need to
be ignored when we're resizing. Instead, we use gravity to anchor
the window's new rectangle when resizing.
Sophisticated clients, like those using ClutterGtk, will have more
than one focused resource per client, as both Clutter and GDK will
ask for a wl_pointer / wl_keyboard. Support this naturally using
the same "hack" as Weston: multiple resource lists, where we move
elements from one to the other.
In order to support multiple pointers for the same client, we're
going to need to kill it.
This will cause crashes for now, but will be fixed by the next
commit.
Doing this synchronously means that zenity tries to initialize GTK+.
Under Wayland, that will try to connect back to mutter as a display
server. We're waiting on zenity to exit, and zenity is waiting for
a connection response. Deadlock.
Simply assume that zenity will support all the options we feed it,
since it should be the correct version. Perhaps we should replace
our use of zenity with a simple helper binary that we know will
have all the right options if this still isn't good enough.
Our focus stealing prevention is still mostly inherited from metacity;
in particular, a (non-transient) window that is not on the current
workspace will not be given focus. This behavior made sense in the
GNOME 2 days, where workspaces were separated much more strictly.
However this is no longer the case in GNOME 3 - activating a launcher
will switch workspaces if necessary, and so will the app switcher.
There is no good reason to not do the same for other user actions
like clicking a URL or activating a search result, so allow activation
of windows on non-active workspaces if a proper timestamp is supplied,
assuming that this is a strong enough indication that we are dealing
with a legitimate user action.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728018
Effectively we have been accepting CurrentTime timestamps for years,
but still complained about "stupid pagers" when encountering them;
just accept that we will never limit treating 0 timestamps as current
time to pagers.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728018
The code that restacks X11 windows at the end first tracks any
old windows we know about, and then handles any windows created.
It starts when it ended, and then walks forwards and then
back looking for the first X11 window it doesn't know about.
However, when there aren't any X11 windows, it flies off the end
of the array and starts looking through random memory.
When it finds the X11 window, it then goes through and then tries
to restack the remaining windows according to how we've sorted
them.
Unfortunately, META_WINDOW_CLIENT_TYPE_X11 is 0, which is quite
common in random memory we have lying around, so we enter that
path and then just crash.
Fix the buffer overrun by adding the proper bounds check to the
search.
You can easily reproduce this by opening a menu while bloatpad
is full-screen. Why it only crashes when full-screen and not
when a standard window, I have no idea.
default_grab_focus tries to add implicit grab semantics where
focus won't take effect if there's a pointer button down. This
is not what we want for popup grabs at all, as it's perfectly
valid to want to drag on a menu while there's a button down.
The idea here is that while we take a WM-side grab, like a compositor
grab or a resizing grab, we need to remove the focus from the Wayland
client.
We make a special exception for CLICKING operations, because these
are really an internal state machine while you're pressing on a button
inside a frame, and in this case, we need to not kill the focus.
