When using the EGLStream backend, the MetaRendererNative passed a
GClosure to KMS when using EGLStreams, but KMS flip callback event
handler in meta-gpu-kms.c expected a closure wrapped in a closure
container, meaning it'd instead crash when using EGLStreams. Make the
flip handler get what it expects also when using EGLStreams by wrapping
the flip closure in the container before handing it over to EGL.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=790316
There seems to be a kernel race when one disconnects an external
monitor connected to a DisplayPort via a USB-C adapter. The race
results in a connector being reported as connected, but without any
modes supported.
This had the side effect that we tried to set a preferred mode to
the first listed mode, but as no modes were available, we instead tried
to dereference the first element of a NULL array, causing a
segmentation fault.
Mitigate this by skipping adding output if no supported modes are
advertised and the output doesn't support scaling, while moving the
fallback path for calculating a preferred output mode to after possibly
adding the common modes, to avoid the unvolentary NULL dereference.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789501
If a monitor's max resolution is a portrait resolution, then assume it is
a native portrait monitor and add portrait versions of the common modes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=782294
The DRM properties container must be destroyed with
drmModeFreeObjectProperties, and the connectors must be freed on every
caller. Also make it sure that gbm_device structs are destroyed with the
MetaRendererNativeGpuData that owns them.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=789984
When drmHandleEvent() returns an error and errno is set to EAGAIN,
instead of ending up in a busy loop, poll() the fd until there is
anything to read.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785381
In order to eventually support multilpe GPUs with their own connectors,
split out related meta data management (i.e. outputs, CRTCs and CRTC
modes) into a new MetaGpu GObject.
The Xrandr backend always assumes there is always only a single "GPU" as
the GPU is abstracted by the X server; only the native backend (aside
from the test backend) will eventually see more than one GPU.
The Xrandr backend still moves some management to MetaGpuXrandr, in
order to behave more similarly to the KMS counterparts.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=785381