Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Olivier Fourdan
8bf399ff0c xwayland: Match applications without WM_CLASS nor WM_NAME
For X11 grabs, the pattern matching mechanism would simply ignore
applications which have neither WM_CLASS nor WM_NAME set.

When dealing with an override redirect window however, it is not
uncommon that these window have neither value set as these window are
supposed to be ignored by the window manager.

When the WM_CLASS or the WM_NAME is not set by the client, assume the
value is empty so the pattern matching can allow for these.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/issues/1249

Part-of: <https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1254>
2020-11-06 15:57:23 +01:00
Olivier Fourdan
17417a82a5 cleanup: remove controversial naming
Replace "whitelist" and "blacklist" with "allow_list" and "deny_list"
which better represent the purpose of those variables.

There is no functional change.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/-/merge_requests/1396
2020-08-04 10:04:16 +02:00
Jonas Ådahl
c0c74484bc wayland: Don't access MetaWaylandSurface::window directly
It'll be moved to the role owning it, accessed via a helper function
implemented by the role. Currently it still just fetches the field in
MetaWaylandSurface.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/835
2020-02-19 22:34:28 +00:00
Robert Mader
92375c75f8 cleanup: Use g_clear_signal_handler() where possible
This is inspired by 98892391d7 where the usage of
`g_signal_handler_disconnect()` without resetting the corresponding
handler id later resulted in a bug. Using `g_clear_signal_handler()`
makes sure we avoid similar bugs and is almost always the better
alternative. We use it for new code, let's clean up the old code to
also use it.

A further benefit is that it can get called even if the passed id is
0, allowing us to remove a lot of now unnessecary checks, and the fact
that `g_clear_signal_handler()` checks for the right type size, forcing us
to clean up all places where we used `guint` instead of `gulong`.

No functional changes intended here and all changes should be trivial,
thus bundled in one big commit.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/940
2019-11-21 15:02:27 +00:00
Olivier Fourdan
c9cc07fd3a settings: Slack off “xwayland-allow-grabs” setting
To emulate X11 grabs, mutter as a Wayland compositor would disable its
own keyboard shortcuts and when the X11 window is an override redirect
window (which never receives focus), it also forces keyboard focus onto
that X11 O-R window so that all keyboard events are routed to the
window, just like an X11 server would.

But that's a bit of a “all-or-nothing” approach which prevents
applications that would legitimately grab the keyboard under X11 (like
virtual machine viewers) to work by default.

Change “xwayland-allow-grabs” to control whether the keyboard focus
should be locked onto override redirect windows in case of an X11 grab.

For stringent needs, careful users can still use the blacklisting
feature (i.e. a list containing “!*”) to prevent grabs from any X11
applications to affect other Wayland native applications.

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/597
2019-06-03 09:34:31 +02:00
Olivier Fourdan
252dd52439 wayland: Clean up xwayland grabs even if surface is gone
If the surface is gone before `meta_xwayland_keyboard_grab_end()` is
called, we would bail out early leaving an empty grab, which will cause
a segfault as soon as a key is pressed later on.

Make sure we clean up the keyboard grab even if the surface is gone.

Closes: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues/255
2018-08-06 11:22:51 +00:00
Olivier Fourdan
072afa5fa3 wayland: Add Xwayland grab keyboard support
This protocol is limited to Xwayland only and is not visible/usable by
any other client.

Mutter uses the following mechanisms to determine if an X11 client
should be granted a grab:

 - is "xwayland-allow-grabs" set?
 - if set, is the client blacklisted?
 - otherwise, has the client set the X11 window property
   _XWAYLAND_MAY_GRAB_KEYBOARD on the window using a client message?
 - if not, is it a client white-listed either via the default system
   list or the settings "xwayland-grab-access-rules"?

https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=783342
2017-12-18 13:15:20 +01:00